公众、训练有素的应对人员和无人机利用诱饵尸体探测搁浅的海洋哺乳动物

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Mary J. Ponti, Mackenzie L. Russell, Cristina Díaz Clark, Carl S. Cloyed, Ruth H. Carmichael, Christina L. Johnson, Jennifer C. G. Bloodgood
{"title":"公众、训练有素的应对人员和无人机利用诱饵尸体探测搁浅的海洋哺乳动物","authors":"Mary J. Ponti, Mackenzie L. Russell, Cristina Díaz Clark, Carl S. Cloyed, Ruth H. Carmichael, Christina L. Johnson, Jennifer C. G. Bloodgood","doi":"10.1111/mms.13169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stranded marine mammals provide valuable insight into population health of free‐ranging conspecifics; however, the likelihood of carcass detection by the public or trained observers is not well known. To better understand carcass detection rates (CDR), we placed twelve decoy dolphin carcasses around Dauphin Island, Alabama, for 2 weeks, one during peak tourist season and one during the off season. Decoys were placed in regions representing different habitat types (marsh or beach) and levels of human use (low or high). Calls from the public were recorded, and trained observers actively searched for decoys via drone and visual observation either by vessel or UTV and walking. There were 2.5 times more public reports during the peak (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 38) compared to off season (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 15), with most reports being from the high‐traffic beach site during peak season (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 27). Trained observers found more decoys (CDR = 0.88) than the public (CDR = 0.58), however, the public found two decoys that observers did not. Drone searches were slightly more successful (CDR = 0.83) than other methods (CDR = 0.79). Our results indicate that a combination of surveillance methods will enhance carcass detection, and our novel methods can be used across habitat types to improve stranding surveillance, better estimate stranding rates, and inform mortality estimates of many species.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stranded marine mammal detection by the public, trained responders, and drones using decoy carcasses\",\"authors\":\"Mary J. Ponti, Mackenzie L. Russell, Cristina Díaz Clark, Carl S. Cloyed, Ruth H. Carmichael, Christina L. Johnson, Jennifer C. G. Bloodgood\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/mms.13169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stranded marine mammals provide valuable insight into population health of free‐ranging conspecifics; however, the likelihood of carcass detection by the public or trained observers is not well known. To better understand carcass detection rates (CDR), we placed twelve decoy dolphin carcasses around Dauphin Island, Alabama, for 2 weeks, one during peak tourist season and one during the off season. Decoys were placed in regions representing different habitat types (marsh or beach) and levels of human use (low or high). Calls from the public were recorded, and trained observers actively searched for decoys via drone and visual observation either by vessel or UTV and walking. There were 2.5 times more public reports during the peak (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 38) compared to off season (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 15), with most reports being from the high‐traffic beach site during peak season (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 27). Trained observers found more decoys (CDR = 0.88) than the public (CDR = 0.58), however, the public found two decoys that observers did not. Drone searches were slightly more successful (CDR = 0.83) than other methods (CDR = 0.79). Our results indicate that a combination of surveillance methods will enhance carcass detection, and our novel methods can be used across habitat types to improve stranding surveillance, better estimate stranding rates, and inform mortality estimates of many species.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.13169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.13169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

搁浅的海洋哺乳动物为了解散养同类的种群健康状况提供了宝贵的信息;然而,公众或训练有素的观察者发现海豚尸体的可能性并不十分清楚。为了更好地了解海豚尸体检测率(CDR),我们在阿拉巴马州多芬岛周围放置了 12 个诱饵海豚尸体,为期两周,其中一个在旅游旺季,另一个在淡季。诱饵被放置在代表不同栖息地类型(沼泽或海滩)和人类使用水平(低或高)的区域。公众的呼叫被记录下来,训练有素的观察员通过无人机、船只或 UTV 的目视观察以及步行积极搜寻诱饵。与淡季(15 起)相比,旺季(38 起)的公众报告数量是淡季(15 起)的 2.5 倍,其中大部分报告来自旺季人流量大的海滩地点(27 起)。训练有素的观察员发现的诱饵(CDR = 0.88)比公众发现的诱饵(CDR = 0.58)要多,但是公众发现了两个诱饵,而观察员没有发现。无人机搜索的成功率(CDR = 0.83)略高于其他方法(CDR = 0.79)。我们的研究结果表明,将多种监测方法结合起来可提高尸体探测效果,我们的新方法可用于各种生境类型,以改进搁浅监测、更好地估计搁浅率,并为许多物种的死亡率估计提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stranded marine mammal detection by the public, trained responders, and drones using decoy carcasses
Stranded marine mammals provide valuable insight into population health of free‐ranging conspecifics; however, the likelihood of carcass detection by the public or trained observers is not well known. To better understand carcass detection rates (CDR), we placed twelve decoy dolphin carcasses around Dauphin Island, Alabama, for 2 weeks, one during peak tourist season and one during the off season. Decoys were placed in regions representing different habitat types (marsh or beach) and levels of human use (low or high). Calls from the public were recorded, and trained observers actively searched for decoys via drone and visual observation either by vessel or UTV and walking. There were 2.5 times more public reports during the peak (n = 38) compared to off season (n = 15), with most reports being from the high‐traffic beach site during peak season (n = 27). Trained observers found more decoys (CDR = 0.88) than the public (CDR = 0.58), however, the public found two decoys that observers did not. Drone searches were slightly more successful (CDR = 0.83) than other methods (CDR = 0.79). Our results indicate that a combination of surveillance methods will enhance carcass detection, and our novel methods can be used across habitat types to improve stranding surveillance, better estimate stranding rates, and inform mortality estimates of many species.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信