有香料与无香料产品:毒性比较

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Neda Nematollahi, Anne Steinemann, Spas D. Kolev, Ary A. Hoffmann, Perran A. Ross
{"title":"有香料与无香料产品:毒性比较","authors":"Neda Nematollahi,&nbsp;Anne Steinemann,&nbsp;Spas D. Kolev,&nbsp;Ary A. Hoffmann,&nbsp;Perran A. Ross","doi":"10.1007/s11869-024-01620-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fragranced consumer products, such as cleaning supplies and laundry products, emit potentially hazardous compounds that can adversely affect human health and air quality. However, fragrance compounds, such as terpenes, are generally absent in fragrance-free versions of products. This study aimed to investigate whether fragranced and fragrance-free versions of the same products, with the same concentration and brand, may have different toxicological effects. To explore this question, this study examined five pairs of fragranced and fragrance-free versions of products from different categories: dish soap, daily shower spray, tub and tile cleaner, laundry detergent, and all purpose cleaner. Toxicity tests were conducted with adult <i>Aedes aegypti</i> mosquitoes. The results indicated that in four pairs of products, the fragrance-free versions showed lower toxicity to mosquitoes compared to fragranced versions at the same concentration. For the all purpose cleaner, both versions showed low toxicity that was indistinguishable from the control. Our results provide novel evidence that fragrance-free versions of products can demonstrate lower toxicity than fragranced versions of products.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"17 12","pages":"3045 - 3050"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fragranced versus fragrance-free products: a comparison of toxicity\",\"authors\":\"Neda Nematollahi,&nbsp;Anne Steinemann,&nbsp;Spas D. Kolev,&nbsp;Ary A. Hoffmann,&nbsp;Perran A. Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11869-024-01620-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Fragranced consumer products, such as cleaning supplies and laundry products, emit potentially hazardous compounds that can adversely affect human health and air quality. However, fragrance compounds, such as terpenes, are generally absent in fragrance-free versions of products. This study aimed to investigate whether fragranced and fragrance-free versions of the same products, with the same concentration and brand, may have different toxicological effects. To explore this question, this study examined five pairs of fragranced and fragrance-free versions of products from different categories: dish soap, daily shower spray, tub and tile cleaner, laundry detergent, and all purpose cleaner. Toxicity tests were conducted with adult <i>Aedes aegypti</i> mosquitoes. The results indicated that in four pairs of products, the fragrance-free versions showed lower toxicity to mosquitoes compared to fragranced versions at the same concentration. For the all purpose cleaner, both versions showed low toxicity that was indistinguishable from the control. Our results provide novel evidence that fragrance-free versions of products can demonstrate lower toxicity than fragranced versions of products.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health\",\"volume\":\"17 12\",\"pages\":\"3045 - 3050\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-024-01620-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-024-01620-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有香味的消费品,如清洁用品和洗衣产品,会释放出潜在的有害化合物,对人体健康和空气质量造成不利影响。然而,无香料产品通常不含萜烯等香料化合物。本研究旨在探讨浓度和品牌相同的同类产品中,有香料和无香料版本是否会产生不同的毒理效应。为了探讨这个问题,本研究检测了五对不同类别的有香型和无香型产品:洗洁精、日用沐浴露、浴缸和瓷砖清洁剂、洗衣粉和全效清洁剂。用埃及伊蚊成蚊进行了毒性测试。结果表明,在四对产品中,相同浓度下,不含香料的产品对蚊子的毒性低于含香料的产品。在通用清洁剂中,两种产品的毒性都很低,与对照组没有区别。我们的研究结果提供了新的证据,证明不含香料的产品比含香料的产品毒性更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Fragranced versus fragrance-free products: a comparison of toxicity

Fragranced versus fragrance-free products: a comparison of toxicity

Fragranced consumer products, such as cleaning supplies and laundry products, emit potentially hazardous compounds that can adversely affect human health and air quality. However, fragrance compounds, such as terpenes, are generally absent in fragrance-free versions of products. This study aimed to investigate whether fragranced and fragrance-free versions of the same products, with the same concentration and brand, may have different toxicological effects. To explore this question, this study examined five pairs of fragranced and fragrance-free versions of products from different categories: dish soap, daily shower spray, tub and tile cleaner, laundry detergent, and all purpose cleaner. Toxicity tests were conducted with adult Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. The results indicated that in four pairs of products, the fragrance-free versions showed lower toxicity to mosquitoes compared to fragranced versions at the same concentration. For the all purpose cleaner, both versions showed low toxicity that was indistinguishable from the control. Our results provide novel evidence that fragrance-free versions of products can demonstrate lower toxicity than fragranced versions of products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health. It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes. International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements. This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信