与巴西专业人员一起评估自闭症行为干预中物理约束的社会有效性

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Rafael Augusto Silva, Juliana Lobato, Beatriz dos Santos Nascimento, Victoria Melo Alves Veduatto, Rafael Diego Modenesi
{"title":"与巴西专业人员一起评估自闭症行为干预中物理约束的社会有效性","authors":"Rafael Augusto Silva, Juliana Lobato, Beatriz dos Santos Nascimento, Victoria Melo Alves Veduatto, Rafael Diego Modenesi","doi":"10.1007/s40617-024-00978-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of physical restraint (PR) in behavioral interventions to ensure safety in response to severe aggressive behaviors in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a controversial subject. Its use should be planned and limited to behavioral emergencies, carried out by trained and supervised professionals. The present study evaluated the social validity of PR in the treatment of ASD with professionals from a Brazilian organization that follows the best practices for safety and implementation of PR, replicating the study by Luiselli et al. (2015). The results show that, overall, participants assessed this procedure as acceptable, effective, and safe, and they agree that it should only be used when all deescalation procedures fail and exclusively to ensure safety. Factors that may influence participants' evaluations are discussed, such as access to information, the need for use, supervision, training, and previous professional experience implementing PR, highlighting the importance of conducting further studies that evaluate the social validity of PR use with different populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47310,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the Social Validity of Physical Restraint in Behavioral Interventions for Autism with Brazilian Professionals\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Augusto Silva, Juliana Lobato, Beatriz dos Santos Nascimento, Victoria Melo Alves Veduatto, Rafael Diego Modenesi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40617-024-00978-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The use of physical restraint (PR) in behavioral interventions to ensure safety in response to severe aggressive behaviors in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a controversial subject. Its use should be planned and limited to behavioral emergencies, carried out by trained and supervised professionals. The present study evaluated the social validity of PR in the treatment of ASD with professionals from a Brazilian organization that follows the best practices for safety and implementation of PR, replicating the study by Luiselli et al. (2015). The results show that, overall, participants assessed this procedure as acceptable, effective, and safe, and they agree that it should only be used when all deescalation procedures fail and exclusively to ensure safety. Factors that may influence participants' evaluations are discussed, such as access to information, the need for use, supervision, training, and previous professional experience implementing PR, highlighting the importance of conducting further studies that evaluate the social validity of PR use with different populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Analysis in Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Analysis in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-00978-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-00978-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在自闭症谱系障碍 (ASD) 严重攻击行为的行为干预中使用物理约束 (PR) 以确保安全是一个有争议的话题。物理约束的使用应该是有计划的,并且仅限于行为紧急情况,由受过培训和监督的专业人员执行。本研究评估了 PR 在自闭症谱系障碍治疗中的社会有效性,研究对象是来自巴西一家机构的专业人员,该机构遵循 PR 安全和实施的最佳实践,并复制了 Luiselli 等人(2015 年)的研究。结果显示,总体而言,参与者对该程序的评价是可接受的、有效的和安全的,他们同意只有在所有降级程序都失败时才应使用该程序,而且只能用于确保安全。研究还讨论了可能影响参与者评价的因素,如信息获取、使用需求、监督、培训和之前实施 PR 的专业经验,这突出了开展进一步研究的重要性,这些研究将评估 PR 在不同人群中使用的社会有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessment of the Social Validity of Physical Restraint in Behavioral Interventions for Autism with Brazilian Professionals

Assessment of the Social Validity of Physical Restraint in Behavioral Interventions for Autism with Brazilian Professionals

The use of physical restraint (PR) in behavioral interventions to ensure safety in response to severe aggressive behaviors in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a controversial subject. Its use should be planned and limited to behavioral emergencies, carried out by trained and supervised professionals. The present study evaluated the social validity of PR in the treatment of ASD with professionals from a Brazilian organization that follows the best practices for safety and implementation of PR, replicating the study by Luiselli et al. (2015). The results show that, overall, participants assessed this procedure as acceptable, effective, and safe, and they agree that it should only be used when all deescalation procedures fail and exclusively to ensure safety. Factors that may influence participants' evaluations are discussed, such as access to information, the need for use, supervision, training, and previous professional experience implementing PR, highlighting the importance of conducting further studies that evaluate the social validity of PR use with different populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior Analysis in Practice
Behavior Analysis in Practice PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
自引率
18.20%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Behavior Analysis in Practice, an official journal of the Association for Behavior Analysis International, is a peer-reviewed translational publication designed to provide science-based, best-practice information relevant to service delivery in behavior analysis. The target audience includes front-line service workers and their supervisors, scientist-practitioners, and school personnel. The mission of Behavior Analysis in Practice is to promote empirically validated best practices in an accessible format that describes not only what works, but also the challenges of implementation in practical settings. Types of articles and topics published  include empirical reports describing the application and evaluation of behavior-analytic procedures and programs; discussion papers on professional and practice issues; technical articles on methods, data analysis, or instrumentation in the practice of behavior analysis; tutorials on terms, procedures, and theories relevant to best practices in behavior analysis; and critical reviews of books and products that are aimed at practitioners or consumers of behavior analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信