{"title":"确定虚拟水、物理和经济指标,优化三种不同气候条件下的农业用水量","authors":"A. Amini, K. Othman, F. Abassi, M. J. Booij","doi":"10.1007/s13762-024-05967-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of water productivity indicators for management of water resources is considered in different regions of the world. This research was conducted with the aim of using virtual water and physical and economic productivity indices of water for major agricultural crops to optimize water consumption. The research was conducted for 26 farms in Kurdistan, Iran with three different climates. Reference crop evapotranspiration and effective precipitation were calculated using CROPWAT software. The amount of water consumption was calculated by separating green and blue water and compared with field measurements in the 2017 crop year. To calculate physical productivity and economic productivity, the crop water productivity (<i>CWP</i>) index and the benefit per drop (<i>BPD</i>) and net benefit per drop (<i>NBPD</i>) indices, respectively, were used. The results showed that sugarbeet and barley have the highest and lowest <i>CWP</i> with 4.55 and 0.43 kg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. The measured water consumption in most farms is larger than the calculated values. According to the <i>CWP</i> index, the priority of crop cultivation is sugarbeet, potato, cucumber, apple, alfalfa, wheat and barley. However, <i>BPD</i> and <i>NBPD</i> indicators showed that the priority of cultivation is apple, cucumber, potato, sugarbeet, alfalfa and wheat respectively. The results of the <i>NBPD</i> index showed that apple and barley have the highest and lowest water economic productivity with 54,000 and 2000 IRR/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. The findings, elucidating the significance of employing water economic indicators as opposed to water consumption metrics, can serve as a valuable reference for agricultural practices in analogous climatic regions globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":589,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining virtual water, physical and economic indices to optimize agricultural water consumption in three different climates\",\"authors\":\"A. Amini, K. Othman, F. Abassi, M. J. Booij\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13762-024-05967-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The use of water productivity indicators for management of water resources is considered in different regions of the world. This research was conducted with the aim of using virtual water and physical and economic productivity indices of water for major agricultural crops to optimize water consumption. The research was conducted for 26 farms in Kurdistan, Iran with three different climates. Reference crop evapotranspiration and effective precipitation were calculated using CROPWAT software. The amount of water consumption was calculated by separating green and blue water and compared with field measurements in the 2017 crop year. To calculate physical productivity and economic productivity, the crop water productivity (<i>CWP</i>) index and the benefit per drop (<i>BPD</i>) and net benefit per drop (<i>NBPD</i>) indices, respectively, were used. The results showed that sugarbeet and barley have the highest and lowest <i>CWP</i> with 4.55 and 0.43 kg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. The measured water consumption in most farms is larger than the calculated values. According to the <i>CWP</i> index, the priority of crop cultivation is sugarbeet, potato, cucumber, apple, alfalfa, wheat and barley. However, <i>BPD</i> and <i>NBPD</i> indicators showed that the priority of cultivation is apple, cucumber, potato, sugarbeet, alfalfa and wheat respectively. The results of the <i>NBPD</i> index showed that apple and barley have the highest and lowest water economic productivity with 54,000 and 2000 IRR/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. The findings, elucidating the significance of employing water economic indicators as opposed to water consumption metrics, can serve as a valuable reference for agricultural practices in analogous climatic regions globally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05967-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05967-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determining virtual water, physical and economic indices to optimize agricultural water consumption in three different climates
The use of water productivity indicators for management of water resources is considered in different regions of the world. This research was conducted with the aim of using virtual water and physical and economic productivity indices of water for major agricultural crops to optimize water consumption. The research was conducted for 26 farms in Kurdistan, Iran with three different climates. Reference crop evapotranspiration and effective precipitation were calculated using CROPWAT software. The amount of water consumption was calculated by separating green and blue water and compared with field measurements in the 2017 crop year. To calculate physical productivity and economic productivity, the crop water productivity (CWP) index and the benefit per drop (BPD) and net benefit per drop (NBPD) indices, respectively, were used. The results showed that sugarbeet and barley have the highest and lowest CWP with 4.55 and 0.43 kg/m3, respectively. The measured water consumption in most farms is larger than the calculated values. According to the CWP index, the priority of crop cultivation is sugarbeet, potato, cucumber, apple, alfalfa, wheat and barley. However, BPD and NBPD indicators showed that the priority of cultivation is apple, cucumber, potato, sugarbeet, alfalfa and wheat respectively. The results of the NBPD index showed that apple and barley have the highest and lowest water economic productivity with 54,000 and 2000 IRR/m3, respectively. The findings, elucidating the significance of employing water economic indicators as opposed to water consumption metrics, can serve as a valuable reference for agricultural practices in analogous climatic regions globally.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (IJEST) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of environmental science and technology, innovation, engineering and management.
A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: peer reviewed original research articles, case and technical reports, reviews and analyses papers, short communications and notes to the editor, in interdisciplinary information on the practice and status of research in environmental science and technology, both natural and man made.
The main aspects of research areas include, but are not exclusive to; environmental chemistry and biology, environments pollution control and abatement technology, transport and fate of pollutants in the environment, concentrations and dispersion of wastes in air, water, and soil, point and non-point sources pollution, heavy metals and organic compounds in the environment, atmospheric pollutants and trace gases, solid and hazardous waste management; soil biodegradation and bioremediation of contaminated sites; environmental impact assessment, industrial ecology, ecological and human risk assessment; improved energy management and auditing efficiency and environmental standards and criteria.