利用最佳-最差法对土耳其能源绩效合同进行风险评估

IF 3.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Ecem Öncü, Sermin Onaygil, Rabia Cin
{"title":"利用最佳-最差法对土耳其能源绩效合同进行风险评估","authors":"Ecem Öncü,&nbsp;Sermin Onaygil,&nbsp;Rabia Cin","doi":"10.1007/s12053-024-10256-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Energy Service Companies (ESCO) provide various services to their customers through Energy Performance Contracts (EPCs), including technical support, financial assistance, installation, maintenance, and insurance services. However, emerging risks during this extended process can lead to uncertainties for energy efficiency implementations, ESCOs, and their clients. Understanding of uncertain factors of such energy efficiency applications is therefore crucial. This study aims to evaluate the risks that emerge in the stages of EPC implementations in Türkiye. An expert survey was conducted to assess these risks, with participants consisting of energy managers, representatives from Turkish ESCOs, experts from the financial sector, academics, and decision-makers. Based on the survey responses, the Best–Worst Method (BWM), a multi-criteria decision-making approach, was employed to evaluate the risks in EPCs. Binary comparison vectors, indicating the relative importance of evaluated risk factors, were formulated using the BWM, enabling the calculation of risk weights and the analysis of response consistency. It is revealed that “Financial and Market Risks” is the most important, and “Technological Risks” is the least important risk criterion for EPCs in Türkiye. In the end, policy recommendations were developed to improve EPC applications in Türkiye.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"17 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk assessment of energy performance contracting in Türkiye utilizing best–worst method\",\"authors\":\"Ecem Öncü,&nbsp;Sermin Onaygil,&nbsp;Rabia Cin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12053-024-10256-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Energy Service Companies (ESCO) provide various services to their customers through Energy Performance Contracts (EPCs), including technical support, financial assistance, installation, maintenance, and insurance services. However, emerging risks during this extended process can lead to uncertainties for energy efficiency implementations, ESCOs, and their clients. Understanding of uncertain factors of such energy efficiency applications is therefore crucial. This study aims to evaluate the risks that emerge in the stages of EPC implementations in Türkiye. An expert survey was conducted to assess these risks, with participants consisting of energy managers, representatives from Turkish ESCOs, experts from the financial sector, academics, and decision-makers. Based on the survey responses, the Best–Worst Method (BWM), a multi-criteria decision-making approach, was employed to evaluate the risks in EPCs. Binary comparison vectors, indicating the relative importance of evaluated risk factors, were formulated using the BWM, enabling the calculation of risk weights and the analysis of response consistency. It is revealed that “Financial and Market Risks” is the most important, and “Technological Risks” is the least important risk criterion for EPCs in Türkiye. In the end, policy recommendations were developed to improve EPC applications in Türkiye.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Efficiency\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Efficiency\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-024-10256-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Efficiency","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-024-10256-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能源服务公司(ESCO)通过能效合同(EPC)为客户提供各种服务,包括技术支持、财务援助、安装、维护和保险服务。然而,在这个漫长的过程中,新出现的风险会给能效实施、ESCO 及其客户带来不确定性。因此,了解此类能效应用的不确定因素至关重要。本研究旨在评估土耳其在 EPC 实施阶段出现的风险。为评估这些风险,我们进行了一项专家调查,参与者包括能源管理人员、土耳其能源服务公司代表、金融部门专家、学者和决策者。根据调查回复,采用了最佳-最差法(BWM)这一多重标准决策方法来评估 EPC 中的风险。使用最佳-最差法制定了二元比较向量,表示所评估风险因素的相对重要性,从而能够计算风险权重和分析答复的一致性。结果表明,"金融和市场风险 "是土耳其工程总承包最重要的风险标准,而 "技术风险 "则是最不重要的风险标准。最后,提出了改善土耳其 EPC 应用的政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Risk assessment of energy performance contracting in Türkiye utilizing best–worst method

Risk assessment of energy performance contracting in Türkiye utilizing best–worst method

Energy Service Companies (ESCO) provide various services to their customers through Energy Performance Contracts (EPCs), including technical support, financial assistance, installation, maintenance, and insurance services. However, emerging risks during this extended process can lead to uncertainties for energy efficiency implementations, ESCOs, and their clients. Understanding of uncertain factors of such energy efficiency applications is therefore crucial. This study aims to evaluate the risks that emerge in the stages of EPC implementations in Türkiye. An expert survey was conducted to assess these risks, with participants consisting of energy managers, representatives from Turkish ESCOs, experts from the financial sector, academics, and decision-makers. Based on the survey responses, the Best–Worst Method (BWM), a multi-criteria decision-making approach, was employed to evaluate the risks in EPCs. Binary comparison vectors, indicating the relative importance of evaluated risk factors, were formulated using the BWM, enabling the calculation of risk weights and the analysis of response consistency. It is revealed that “Financial and Market Risks” is the most important, and “Technological Risks” is the least important risk criterion for EPCs in Türkiye. In the end, policy recommendations were developed to improve EPC applications in Türkiye.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Efficiency
Energy Efficiency ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Efficiency covers wide-ranging aspects of energy efficiency in the residential, tertiary, industrial and transport sectors. Coverage includes a number of different topics and disciplines including energy efficiency policies at local, regional, national and international levels; long term impact of energy efficiency; technologies to improve energy efficiency; consumer behavior and the dynamics of consumption; socio-economic impacts of energy efficiency measures; energy efficiency as a virtual utility; transportation issues; building issues; energy management systems and energy services; energy planning and risk assessment; energy efficiency in developing countries and economies in transition; non-energy benefits of energy efficiency and opportunities for policy integration; energy education and training, and emerging technologies. See Aims and Scope for more details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信