未来教师通过以探究为导向的实践进行学习的机制和证据:课程研究干预案例

ZDM Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1007/s11858-024-01620-9
F. J. García, E. M. Lendínez, A. M. Lerma, A. M. Abril
{"title":"未来教师通过以探究为导向的实践进行学习的机制和证据:课程研究干预案例","authors":"F. J. García, E. M. Lendínez, A. M. Lerma, A. M. Abril","doi":"10.1007/s11858-024-01620-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Existing research has highlighted the key role of observation and reflection in teacher learning during lesson study interventions, and how challenging it can be for pre-service teachers. This study focuses on the post-lesson discussion phase and on the observation of the research lesson of a lesson study process. It is carried out with early childhood education pre-service teachers who studied the Theory of Didactical Situations. The aim of our research is two-fold: finding evidence of the activation of pre-service teacher knowledge during the post-lesson discussion, and identifying mechanisms that may explain said activation as well as the potential development of their professional knowledge. To model pre-service teacher knowledge, the notion of teachers’ praxeological equipment from the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic, specified in the Theory of Didactical Situations, is used. It is hypothesised that potential teacher learning is mainly connected to the identification of particularly relevant episodes during the observation phase, henceforth referred to as critical events. The analysis of a group discussion on three critical events shows the activation and development of mathematical and didactic components of pre-service teachers’ praxeological equipment. However, it is found that it depends on the degree of dissonance these events can provoke, and on the quality and depth of the discussion that takes place around them. It is therefore concluded that the identification of critical events followed by productive discussion is a mechanism that explains teacher learning through lesson study, which can be enhanced by the intervention of teacher educators as mediators.</p>","PeriodicalId":501335,"journal":{"name":"ZDM","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanisms and evidence of prospective teachers’ learning through enquiry-oriented practices: the case of a lesson study intervention\",\"authors\":\"F. J. García, E. M. Lendínez, A. M. Lerma, A. M. Abril\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11858-024-01620-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Existing research has highlighted the key role of observation and reflection in teacher learning during lesson study interventions, and how challenging it can be for pre-service teachers. This study focuses on the post-lesson discussion phase and on the observation of the research lesson of a lesson study process. It is carried out with early childhood education pre-service teachers who studied the Theory of Didactical Situations. The aim of our research is two-fold: finding evidence of the activation of pre-service teacher knowledge during the post-lesson discussion, and identifying mechanisms that may explain said activation as well as the potential development of their professional knowledge. To model pre-service teacher knowledge, the notion of teachers’ praxeological equipment from the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic, specified in the Theory of Didactical Situations, is used. It is hypothesised that potential teacher learning is mainly connected to the identification of particularly relevant episodes during the observation phase, henceforth referred to as critical events. The analysis of a group discussion on three critical events shows the activation and development of mathematical and didactic components of pre-service teachers’ praxeological equipment. However, it is found that it depends on the degree of dissonance these events can provoke, and on the quality and depth of the discussion that takes place around them. It is therefore concluded that the identification of critical events followed by productive discussion is a mechanism that explains teacher learning through lesson study, which can be enhanced by the intervention of teacher educators as mediators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ZDM\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ZDM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01620-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZDM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01620-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有研究强调了观察和反思对教师在课例研究干预过程中的学习所起的关键作用,以及它对职前教师所具有的挑战性。本研究的重点是课后讨论阶段和课例研究过程中研究课的观察。研究对象是学习 "教学情境理论 "的幼儿教育职前教师。我们的研究有两个目的:寻找职前教师在课后讨论中激活知识的证据,确定可能解释这种激活的机制以及他们专业知识的潜在发展。为了建立职前教师知识模型,我们使用了教学情境理论(Theory of Didactical Situations)中的教学人类学理论(Anthropological Theory of the Didactic)中的教师实践设备(praxeological equipment)概念。假设教师的潜在学习主要与观察阶段中特别相关事件的识别有关,以下称为关键事件。对三个关键事件的小组讨论分析表明,职前教师的实践设备中的数学和教学部分得到了激活和发展。然而,研究发现,这取决于这些事件可能引发的不和谐程度,以及围绕这些事件开展的讨论的质量和深度。因此,得出的结论是,识别关键事件,然后进行富有成效的讨论,是教师通过课 堂学习进行学习的一种解释机制,而教师教育者作为调解人的干预可以加强这种机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mechanisms and evidence of prospective teachers’ learning through enquiry-oriented practices: the case of a lesson study intervention

Mechanisms and evidence of prospective teachers’ learning through enquiry-oriented practices: the case of a lesson study intervention

Existing research has highlighted the key role of observation and reflection in teacher learning during lesson study interventions, and how challenging it can be for pre-service teachers. This study focuses on the post-lesson discussion phase and on the observation of the research lesson of a lesson study process. It is carried out with early childhood education pre-service teachers who studied the Theory of Didactical Situations. The aim of our research is two-fold: finding evidence of the activation of pre-service teacher knowledge during the post-lesson discussion, and identifying mechanisms that may explain said activation as well as the potential development of their professional knowledge. To model pre-service teacher knowledge, the notion of teachers’ praxeological equipment from the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic, specified in the Theory of Didactical Situations, is used. It is hypothesised that potential teacher learning is mainly connected to the identification of particularly relevant episodes during the observation phase, henceforth referred to as critical events. The analysis of a group discussion on three critical events shows the activation and development of mathematical and didactic components of pre-service teachers’ praxeological equipment. However, it is found that it depends on the degree of dissonance these events can provoke, and on the quality and depth of the discussion that takes place around them. It is therefore concluded that the identification of critical events followed by productive discussion is a mechanism that explains teacher learning through lesson study, which can be enhanced by the intervention of teacher educators as mediators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ZDM
ZDM
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信