术前乳腺磁共振成像对浸润性小叶癌患者手术治疗的影响

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Stephanie Aroney, Thomas Lloyd, Simone Birch, Belinda Godwin, Kylie Walters, Jeremy Khoo, Simone Geere, Linda Shen, Petar Vujovic, Ian Bennett, Gorane Santamaría
{"title":"术前乳腺磁共振成像对浸润性小叶癌患者手术治疗的影响","authors":"Stephanie Aroney,&nbsp;Thomas Lloyd,&nbsp;Simone Birch,&nbsp;Belinda Godwin,&nbsp;Kylie Walters,&nbsp;Jeremy Khoo,&nbsp;Simone Geere,&nbsp;Linda Shen,&nbsp;Petar Vujovic,&nbsp;Ian Bennett,&nbsp;Gorane Santamaría","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The purpose of the study is to assess the role of preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on the surgical management of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and to evaluate whether breast density and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) influence surgical treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study was conducted on 56 patients who were diagnosed with ILC between 2014 and 2020. All patients had mammogram and ultrasound. Preoperative MRI was available in 34 patients. Age, menopausal status, breast density, BPE, multifocality/multicentricity and surgical treatment were collected.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Mean pathological tumour size was 36.4 mm (range 5–140 mm). Dense breasts had larger tumours compared to non-dense breasts (<i>P</i> = 0.072). Of the 34 patients with MRI, 6 opted for mastectomy. Of the remaining 28 cases, MRI findings upgraded surgery to mastectomy in 54% (15/28) because mammogram/ultrasound underestimated tumour extent in 25% (7/28), or multifocal/multicentric disease was identified in 29% (8/28). Tumour size was underestimated by MRI in 7% (2/28). In the non-MRI subgroup, 64% (14/22) of patients underwent breast-conserving surgery, but 29% of them (4/14) required a second-stage mastectomy due to extensive margin involvement. There was no difference in mastectomy rate between patients with MRI (62%) and without MRI (55%) (<i>P</i> = 0.061). Tumour size correlation between MRI and histopathology demonstrated an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Surgical treatment recommendation was not significantly impacted by breast density or BPE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Breast MRI improves surgical management of patients with ILC in providing additional diagnostic information often missed with standard imaging modalities, and without increasing mastectomy rate. Surgical treatment is not impacted by breast density or BPE.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"68 6","pages":"680-686"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative breast MR imaging influences surgical management in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Aroney,&nbsp;Thomas Lloyd,&nbsp;Simone Birch,&nbsp;Belinda Godwin,&nbsp;Kylie Walters,&nbsp;Jeremy Khoo,&nbsp;Simone Geere,&nbsp;Linda Shen,&nbsp;Petar Vujovic,&nbsp;Ian Bennett,&nbsp;Gorane Santamaría\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-9485.13754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>The purpose of the study is to assess the role of preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on the surgical management of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and to evaluate whether breast density and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) influence surgical treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective study was conducted on 56 patients who were diagnosed with ILC between 2014 and 2020. All patients had mammogram and ultrasound. Preoperative MRI was available in 34 patients. Age, menopausal status, breast density, BPE, multifocality/multicentricity and surgical treatment were collected.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mean pathological tumour size was 36.4 mm (range 5–140 mm). Dense breasts had larger tumours compared to non-dense breasts (<i>P</i> = 0.072). Of the 34 patients with MRI, 6 opted for mastectomy. Of the remaining 28 cases, MRI findings upgraded surgery to mastectomy in 54% (15/28) because mammogram/ultrasound underestimated tumour extent in 25% (7/28), or multifocal/multicentric disease was identified in 29% (8/28). Tumour size was underestimated by MRI in 7% (2/28). In the non-MRI subgroup, 64% (14/22) of patients underwent breast-conserving surgery, but 29% of them (4/14) required a second-stage mastectomy due to extensive margin involvement. There was no difference in mastectomy rate between patients with MRI (62%) and without MRI (55%) (<i>P</i> = 0.061). Tumour size correlation between MRI and histopathology demonstrated an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Surgical treatment recommendation was not significantly impacted by breast density or BPE.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Breast MRI improves surgical management of patients with ILC in providing additional diagnostic information often missed with standard imaging modalities, and without increasing mastectomy rate. Surgical treatment is not impacted by breast density or BPE.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"68 6\",\"pages\":\"680-686\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13754\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 本研究旨在评估术前磁共振成像(MR)对浸润性小叶癌(ILC)手术治疗的作用,并评估乳腺密度和背景实质增强(BPE)是否会影响手术治疗。所有患者均进行了乳房X光检查和超声检查。34名患者进行了术前核磁共振成像检查。研究收集了患者的年龄、绝经状态、乳腺密度、BPE、多发性/多中心性和手术治疗情况。与非致密乳房相比,致密乳房的肿瘤更大(P = 0.072)。在 34 例接受磁共振成像检查的患者中,有 6 例选择了乳房切除术。在其余28例患者中,有54%(15/28)的患者因乳房X光检查/超声检查低估了肿瘤范围(25%(7/28)),或发现多灶/多中心疾病(29%(8/28)),而根据磁共振成像结果将手术升级为乳房切除术(15/28)。7%的患者(2/28)的核磁共振检查低估了肿瘤的大小。在非磁共振成像亚组中,64%(14/22)的患者接受了保乳手术,但其中 29%(4/14)的患者因边缘广泛受累而需要进行第二阶段乳房切除术。有磁共振成像的患者(62%)和没有磁共振成像的患者(55%)的乳房切除率没有差异(P = 0.061)。核磁共振成像与组织病理学之间的肿瘤大小相关性显示出极好的类内相关系数(P < 0.001)。结论:乳腺 MRI 可改善 ILC 患者的手术治疗,提供标准成像模式经常忽略的额外诊断信息,且不会增加乳房切除率。手术治疗不受乳腺密度或 BPE 的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative breast MR imaging influences surgical management in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma

Introduction

The purpose of the study is to assess the role of preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on the surgical management of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and to evaluate whether breast density and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) influence surgical treatment.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted on 56 patients who were diagnosed with ILC between 2014 and 2020. All patients had mammogram and ultrasound. Preoperative MRI was available in 34 patients. Age, menopausal status, breast density, BPE, multifocality/multicentricity and surgical treatment were collected.

Results

Mean pathological tumour size was 36.4 mm (range 5–140 mm). Dense breasts had larger tumours compared to non-dense breasts (P = 0.072). Of the 34 patients with MRI, 6 opted for mastectomy. Of the remaining 28 cases, MRI findings upgraded surgery to mastectomy in 54% (15/28) because mammogram/ultrasound underestimated tumour extent in 25% (7/28), or multifocal/multicentric disease was identified in 29% (8/28). Tumour size was underestimated by MRI in 7% (2/28). In the non-MRI subgroup, 64% (14/22) of patients underwent breast-conserving surgery, but 29% of them (4/14) required a second-stage mastectomy due to extensive margin involvement. There was no difference in mastectomy rate between patients with MRI (62%) and without MRI (55%) (P = 0.061). Tumour size correlation between MRI and histopathology demonstrated an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (P < 0.001). Surgical treatment recommendation was not significantly impacted by breast density or BPE.

Conclusion

Breast MRI improves surgical management of patients with ILC in providing additional diagnostic information often missed with standard imaging modalities, and without increasing mastectomy rate. Surgical treatment is not impacted by breast density or BPE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信