{"title":"超声刺激微气泡增强放疗效果:范围综述","authors":"Giulia McCorkell, Terrence Piva, Declan Highgate, Masao Nakayama, Moshi Geso","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Primarily used as ultrasound contrast agents, microbubbles have recently emerged as a versatile therapeutic vector that can be ‘burst’ to deliver payloads in the presence of suitably optimised ultrasound fields. Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) have recently demonstrated improvements in treatment outcomes across a variety of clinical applications. This scoping review investigates whether this potential translates into the context of radiation therapy by evaluating the application of this technology across all three phases of radiation action.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Primary research articles, excluding poster presentations and conference proceedings, were identified through systematic searches of the PubMed NCBI/Medline, Embase/OVID, Web of Science and CINAHL/EBSCOhost databases, with additional articles identified via manual Google Scholar searching. Articles were dual screened for inclusion using the Covidence systematic review platform and classified against all three phases of radiation action.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 57 eligible publications from a total of 1389 identified articles were included in the review, with studies dating back to 2012. Study heterogeneity prevented formal statistical analysis; however, most articles reported improved outcomes using USMB in the presence of radiation compared to that of radiation alone. These improvements appear to result from the use of USMB as either a biovascular disruptor causing tumour cell damage via indirect mechanisms, or as a localised treatment vector that directly increases tumour cell uptake of other therapeutic and physical agents designed to enhance radiation action.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>USMB demonstrate exciting potential to enhance the effects of radiation treatments due to their versatility and capacity to target all three phases of radiation action.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"68 6","pages":"740-769"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1754-9485.13740","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles to enhance radiotherapy: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Giulia McCorkell, Terrence Piva, Declan Highgate, Masao Nakayama, Moshi Geso\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-9485.13740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Primarily used as ultrasound contrast agents, microbubbles have recently emerged as a versatile therapeutic vector that can be ‘burst’ to deliver payloads in the presence of suitably optimised ultrasound fields. Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) have recently demonstrated improvements in treatment outcomes across a variety of clinical applications. This scoping review investigates whether this potential translates into the context of radiation therapy by evaluating the application of this technology across all three phases of radiation action.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Primary research articles, excluding poster presentations and conference proceedings, were identified through systematic searches of the PubMed NCBI/Medline, Embase/OVID, Web of Science and CINAHL/EBSCOhost databases, with additional articles identified via manual Google Scholar searching. Articles were dual screened for inclusion using the Covidence systematic review platform and classified against all three phases of radiation action.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, 57 eligible publications from a total of 1389 identified articles were included in the review, with studies dating back to 2012. Study heterogeneity prevented formal statistical analysis; however, most articles reported improved outcomes using USMB in the presence of radiation compared to that of radiation alone. These improvements appear to result from the use of USMB as either a biovascular disruptor causing tumour cell damage via indirect mechanisms, or as a localised treatment vector that directly increases tumour cell uptake of other therapeutic and physical agents designed to enhance radiation action.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>USMB demonstrate exciting potential to enhance the effects of radiation treatments due to their versatility and capacity to target all three phases of radiation action.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"68 6\",\"pages\":\"740-769\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1754-9485.13740\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13740\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13740","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:微气泡主要用作超声造影剂,最近已成为一种多功能治疗载体,可在适当优化的超声场中 "迸发 "释放有效载荷。最近,超声刺激微泡(USMB)在各种临床应用中的治疗效果都有所改善。方法通过系统搜索 PubMed NCBI/Medline、Embase/OVID、Web of Science 和 CINAHL/EBSCOhost 数据库来确定主要研究文章(不包括海报展示和会议论文集),并通过手动搜索 Google Scholar 来确定其他文章。文章通过Covidence系统性综述平台进行双重筛选,并根据辐射行动的所有三个阶段进行分类。结果综述共收录了1389篇符合条件的文章中的57篇,研究时间可追溯到2012年。由于研究存在异质性,因此无法进行正式的统计分析;不过,大多数文章报告称,与单纯放射治疗相比,在放射治疗的同时使用 USMB 可改善疗效。这些改善似乎是由于 USMB 作为一种生物血管破坏剂,通过间接机制造成肿瘤细胞损伤,或者作为一种局部治疗载体,直接增加肿瘤细胞对旨在增强辐射作用的其他治疗和物理制剂的吸收。
Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles to enhance radiotherapy: A scoping review
Introduction
Primarily used as ultrasound contrast agents, microbubbles have recently emerged as a versatile therapeutic vector that can be ‘burst’ to deliver payloads in the presence of suitably optimised ultrasound fields. Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) have recently demonstrated improvements in treatment outcomes across a variety of clinical applications. This scoping review investigates whether this potential translates into the context of radiation therapy by evaluating the application of this technology across all three phases of radiation action.
Methods
Primary research articles, excluding poster presentations and conference proceedings, were identified through systematic searches of the PubMed NCBI/Medline, Embase/OVID, Web of Science and CINAHL/EBSCOhost databases, with additional articles identified via manual Google Scholar searching. Articles were dual screened for inclusion using the Covidence systematic review platform and classified against all three phases of radiation action.
Results
Overall, 57 eligible publications from a total of 1389 identified articles were included in the review, with studies dating back to 2012. Study heterogeneity prevented formal statistical analysis; however, most articles reported improved outcomes using USMB in the presence of radiation compared to that of radiation alone. These improvements appear to result from the use of USMB as either a biovascular disruptor causing tumour cell damage via indirect mechanisms, or as a localised treatment vector that directly increases tumour cell uptake of other therapeutic and physical agents designed to enhance radiation action.
Conclusions
USMB demonstrate exciting potential to enhance the effects of radiation treatments due to their versatility and capacity to target all three phases of radiation action.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.