血糖对胰岛素抵抗认知功能的影响:流动评估的新见解

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Judith R. Gruber, Alea Ruf, Elena D. Süß, Sewin Tariverdian, Kira F. Ahrens, Carmen Schiweck, Ulrich Ebner-Priemer, Sharmili Edwin Thanarajah, Andreas Reif, Silke Matura
{"title":"血糖对胰岛素抵抗认知功能的影响:流动评估的新见解","authors":"Judith R. Gruber, Alea Ruf, Elena D. Süß, Sewin Tariverdian, Kira F. Ahrens, Carmen Schiweck, Ulrich Ebner-Priemer, Sharmili Edwin Thanarajah, Andreas Reif, Silke Matura","doi":"10.1038/s41387-024-00331-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background/objectives</h3><p>Insulin resistance (IR)-related disorders and cognitive impairment lead to reduced quality of life and cause a significant strain on individuals and the public health system. Thus, we investigated the effects of insulin resistance (IR), and blood glucose fluctuations on cognitive function under laboratory and free-living conditions, using ecological momentary assessment (EMA).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Subjects/methods</h3><p>Baseline assessments included neuropsychological tests and blood analysis. Individuals were classified as either insulin-sensitive (&lt;2) or insulin-resistant (≥2), based on their Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA-IR) values. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) using a percutaneous sensor was performed for 1 week. Using multiple linear regression, we examined the effects of HOMA-IR and CGM metrics on cognitive domains. Working memory (WM) performance, which was assessed using EMA, 4 times a day for 3 consecutive days, was matched to short-term pre-task CGM metrics. Multilevel analysis was used to map the within-day associations of HOMA-IR, short-term CGM metrics, and WM.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Analyses included 110 individuals (mean age 48.7 ± 14.3 years, 59% female, <i>n</i> = 53 insulin-resistant). IR was associated with lower global cognitive function (<i>b</i> = −0.267, <i>P</i> = 0.027), and WM (<i>b</i> = −0.316; <i>P</i> = 0.029), but not with executive function (<i>b</i> = −0.216; <i>P</i> = 0.154) during baseline. EMA showed that higher HOMA-IR was associated with lower within-day WM performance (β = −0.20, 95% CI −0.40 to −0.00). CGM metrics were not associated with cognitive performance.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The results confirm the association between IR and decrements in global cognitive functioning and WM, while no effects of CGM metrics were observed, making IR a crucial time point for intervention. Targeting underlying mechanisms (e.g., inflammation) in addition to glycemia could be promising to minimize adverse cognitive effects. Registered under https://drks.de/register/de identifier no. DRKS00022774.</p><figure></figure>","PeriodicalId":19339,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of blood glucose on cognitive function in insulin resistance: novel insights from ambulatory assessment\",\"authors\":\"Judith R. Gruber, Alea Ruf, Elena D. Süß, Sewin Tariverdian, Kira F. Ahrens, Carmen Schiweck, Ulrich Ebner-Priemer, Sharmili Edwin Thanarajah, Andreas Reif, Silke Matura\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41387-024-00331-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background/objectives</h3><p>Insulin resistance (IR)-related disorders and cognitive impairment lead to reduced quality of life and cause a significant strain on individuals and the public health system. Thus, we investigated the effects of insulin resistance (IR), and blood glucose fluctuations on cognitive function under laboratory and free-living conditions, using ecological momentary assessment (EMA).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Subjects/methods</h3><p>Baseline assessments included neuropsychological tests and blood analysis. Individuals were classified as either insulin-sensitive (&lt;2) or insulin-resistant (≥2), based on their Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA-IR) values. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) using a percutaneous sensor was performed for 1 week. Using multiple linear regression, we examined the effects of HOMA-IR and CGM metrics on cognitive domains. Working memory (WM) performance, which was assessed using EMA, 4 times a day for 3 consecutive days, was matched to short-term pre-task CGM metrics. Multilevel analysis was used to map the within-day associations of HOMA-IR, short-term CGM metrics, and WM.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Analyses included 110 individuals (mean age 48.7 ± 14.3 years, 59% female, <i>n</i> = 53 insulin-resistant). IR was associated with lower global cognitive function (<i>b</i> = −0.267, <i>P</i> = 0.027), and WM (<i>b</i> = −0.316; <i>P</i> = 0.029), but not with executive function (<i>b</i> = −0.216; <i>P</i> = 0.154) during baseline. EMA showed that higher HOMA-IR was associated with lower within-day WM performance (β = −0.20, 95% CI −0.40 to −0.00). CGM metrics were not associated with cognitive performance.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>The results confirm the association between IR and decrements in global cognitive functioning and WM, while no effects of CGM metrics were observed, making IR a crucial time point for intervention. Targeting underlying mechanisms (e.g., inflammation) in addition to glycemia could be promising to minimize adverse cognitive effects. Registered under https://drks.de/register/de identifier no. DRKS00022774.</p><figure></figure>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition & Diabetes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition & Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41387-024-00331-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41387-024-00331-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的胰岛素抵抗(IR)相关疾病和认知障碍会导致生活质量下降,给个人和公共卫生系统造成巨大压力。因此,我们采用生态瞬间评估(EMA)方法,研究了在实验室和自由生活条件下,胰岛素抵抗(IR)和血糖波动对认知功能的影响。根据胰岛素静态模型评估(HOMA-IR)值将患者分为胰岛素敏感型(<2)和胰岛素抵抗型(≥2)。使用经皮传感器进行了为期一周的连续血糖监测(CGM)。通过多元线性回归,我们研究了 HOMA-IR 和 CGM 指标对认知领域的影响。工作记忆(WM)表现与短期任务前 CGM 指标相匹配,工作记忆表现是通过连续 3 天每天 4 次的 EMA 进行评估的。采用多层次分析法绘制了 HOMA-IR、短期 CGM 指标和 WM 的日内关联图。IR 与基线期间较低的整体认知功能(b = -0.267,P = 0.027)和 WM(b = -0.316;P = 0.029)有关,但与执行功能(b = -0.216;P = 0.154)无关。EMA显示,较高的HOMA-IR与较低的日内WM表现相关(β = -0.20,95% CI -0.40至-0.00)。结论结果证实了IR与整体认知功能和WM下降之间的关联,而CGM指标没有影响,因此IR是干预的关键时间点。除了血糖之外,针对潜在机制(如炎症)进行干预也很有希望将对认知的不利影响降至最低。注册号为 https://drks.de/register/de identifier no.DRKS00022774.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of blood glucose on cognitive function in insulin resistance: novel insights from ambulatory assessment

Impact of blood glucose on cognitive function in insulin resistance: novel insights from ambulatory assessment

Background/objectives

Insulin resistance (IR)-related disorders and cognitive impairment lead to reduced quality of life and cause a significant strain on individuals and the public health system. Thus, we investigated the effects of insulin resistance (IR), and blood glucose fluctuations on cognitive function under laboratory and free-living conditions, using ecological momentary assessment (EMA).

Subjects/methods

Baseline assessments included neuropsychological tests and blood analysis. Individuals were classified as either insulin-sensitive (<2) or insulin-resistant (≥2), based on their Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA-IR) values. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) using a percutaneous sensor was performed for 1 week. Using multiple linear regression, we examined the effects of HOMA-IR and CGM metrics on cognitive domains. Working memory (WM) performance, which was assessed using EMA, 4 times a day for 3 consecutive days, was matched to short-term pre-task CGM metrics. Multilevel analysis was used to map the within-day associations of HOMA-IR, short-term CGM metrics, and WM.

Results

Analyses included 110 individuals (mean age 48.7 ± 14.3 years, 59% female, n = 53 insulin-resistant). IR was associated with lower global cognitive function (b = −0.267, P = 0.027), and WM (b = −0.316; P = 0.029), but not with executive function (b = −0.216; P = 0.154) during baseline. EMA showed that higher HOMA-IR was associated with lower within-day WM performance (β = −0.20, 95% CI −0.40 to −0.00). CGM metrics were not associated with cognitive performance.

Conclusions

The results confirm the association between IR and decrements in global cognitive functioning and WM, while no effects of CGM metrics were observed, making IR a crucial time point for intervention. Targeting underlying mechanisms (e.g., inflammation) in addition to glycemia could be promising to minimize adverse cognitive effects. Registered under https://drks.de/register/de identifier no. DRKS00022774.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition & Diabetes
Nutrition & Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-NUTRITION & DIETETICS
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Diabetes is a peer-reviewed, online, open access journal bringing to the fore outstanding research in the areas of nutrition and chronic disease, including diabetes, from the molecular to the population level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信