在复杂结肠病变的腔内治疗中使用卡环尖端内镜黏膜下剥离术

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Michael J Klingler,Kamil Erozkan,Ali Alipouriani,Joshua Sommovilla,Emre Gorgun
{"title":"在复杂结肠病变的腔内治疗中使用卡环尖端内镜黏膜下剥离术","authors":"Michael J Klingler,Kamil Erozkan,Ali Alipouriani,Joshua Sommovilla,Emre Gorgun","doi":"10.1097/dcr.0000000000003526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nEndoscopic submucosal dissection for advanced colon lesions is typically performed with specialized and costly endoscopic knives, potentially limiting accessibility and increasing procedural cost. Alternatively, the tip of an endoscopic snare, which is inexpensive and universally available, has demonstrated safe and efficient use in gastric lesions but lacks sufficient data for use in colon lesions.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nThis study aimed to assess patient outcomes following endoscopic submucosal dissection of advanced colon lesions using the endoscopic snare tip.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nA retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database at a single tertiary care center was conducted.\r\n\r\nSETTINGS\r\nThis study was conducted at a single tertiary care center.\r\n\r\nPATIENTS\r\nAdult patients with colon lesions that were not amenable to snare polypectomy were evaluated for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Snare tip resection was performed in select patients with lesions that lifted adequately after submucosal injection. Patients who underwent hybrid resections with endoscopic mucosal dissection were excluded.\r\n\r\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\r\nEn bloc resection rates, operative time, perioperative complications, and short-term outcomes such as length of stay and lesion recurrence on follow-up colonoscopy were evaluated.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 121 patients underwent snare tip endoscopic submucosal dissection, with a mean lesion size of 28.8 ± 9.84 mm. Most procedures were performed in the endoscopy suite (81.8%). The en bloc resection rate was 81.8% with an average procedure time of 37.1 ± 29.8 min. There were two perforations (1.70%), one of which was managed operatively. Recurrence occurred in 6 patients (7.89%) at the time of follow-up colonoscopy.\r\n\r\nLIMITATIONS\r\nThis study was retrospective, conducted by two skilled endoscopists with experience in endoscopic resection, and had short-term follow up.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nSnare tip endoscopic submucosal dissection for advanced colon lesions demonstrates satisfactory short-term outcomes, suggesting its potential as a safe and accessible alternative to specialized knives, thereby possibly enhancing adoption of endoscopic resection and improving patient accessibility. See Video Abstract.","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Snare Tip Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Endoluminal Management of Complex Colon Lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Michael J Klingler,Kamil Erozkan,Ali Alipouriani,Joshua Sommovilla,Emre Gorgun\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/dcr.0000000000003526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nEndoscopic submucosal dissection for advanced colon lesions is typically performed with specialized and costly endoscopic knives, potentially limiting accessibility and increasing procedural cost. Alternatively, the tip of an endoscopic snare, which is inexpensive and universally available, has demonstrated safe and efficient use in gastric lesions but lacks sufficient data for use in colon lesions.\\r\\n\\r\\nOBJECTIVE\\r\\nThis study aimed to assess patient outcomes following endoscopic submucosal dissection of advanced colon lesions using the endoscopic snare tip.\\r\\n\\r\\nDESIGN\\r\\nA retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database at a single tertiary care center was conducted.\\r\\n\\r\\nSETTINGS\\r\\nThis study was conducted at a single tertiary care center.\\r\\n\\r\\nPATIENTS\\r\\nAdult patients with colon lesions that were not amenable to snare polypectomy were evaluated for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Snare tip resection was performed in select patients with lesions that lifted adequately after submucosal injection. Patients who underwent hybrid resections with endoscopic mucosal dissection were excluded.\\r\\n\\r\\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\\r\\nEn bloc resection rates, operative time, perioperative complications, and short-term outcomes such as length of stay and lesion recurrence on follow-up colonoscopy were evaluated.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nA total of 121 patients underwent snare tip endoscopic submucosal dissection, with a mean lesion size of 28.8 ± 9.84 mm. Most procedures were performed in the endoscopy suite (81.8%). The en bloc resection rate was 81.8% with an average procedure time of 37.1 ± 29.8 min. There were two perforations (1.70%), one of which was managed operatively. Recurrence occurred in 6 patients (7.89%) at the time of follow-up colonoscopy.\\r\\n\\r\\nLIMITATIONS\\r\\nThis study was retrospective, conducted by two skilled endoscopists with experience in endoscopic resection, and had short-term follow up.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nSnare tip endoscopic submucosal dissection for advanced colon lesions demonstrates satisfactory short-term outcomes, suggesting its potential as a safe and accessible alternative to specialized knives, thereby possibly enhancing adoption of endoscopic resection and improving patient accessibility. See Video Abstract.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000003526\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000003526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗晚期结肠病变通常使用专业且昂贵的内镜刀,这可能会限制手术的可及性并增加手术成本。另外,内镜卡环的尖端价格低廉且普遍可用,在胃部病变中的使用安全高效,但在结肠病变中的使用却缺乏足够的数据。目的本研究旨在评估使用内镜卡环尖端对晚期结肠病变进行内镜粘膜下剥离术后的患者预后。本研究在一家三级医疗中心进行。患者成人结肠病变患者无法进行蜗牛息肉切除术,经评估后进行了内镜粘膜下剥离术。对于粘膜下注射后病灶能充分抬起的部分患者,进行了卡环尖端切除术。主要结果指标评估了整体切除率、手术时间、围手术期并发症以及短期疗效,如住院时间和随访结肠镜检查时病变复发情况。结果共有121名患者接受了卡环尖端内镜粘膜下剥离术,平均病变大小为28.8 ± 9.84 mm。大多数手术在内镜室进行(81.8%)。全切率为 81.8%,平均手术时间为 37.1 ± 29.8 分钟。有两例穿孔(1.70%),其中一例经手术处理。限制本研究为回顾性研究,由两名具有内镜切除经验的熟练内镜医师进行,并进行了短期随访。结论针尖内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗晚期结肠病变的短期疗效令人满意,表明它有可能成为专业刀具的一种安全、方便的替代方法,从而有可能提高内镜切除术的采用率,改善患者的就医条件。参见视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of Snare Tip Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Endoluminal Management of Complex Colon Lesions.
BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection for advanced colon lesions is typically performed with specialized and costly endoscopic knives, potentially limiting accessibility and increasing procedural cost. Alternatively, the tip of an endoscopic snare, which is inexpensive and universally available, has demonstrated safe and efficient use in gastric lesions but lacks sufficient data for use in colon lesions. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess patient outcomes following endoscopic submucosal dissection of advanced colon lesions using the endoscopic snare tip. DESIGN A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database at a single tertiary care center was conducted. SETTINGS This study was conducted at a single tertiary care center. PATIENTS Adult patients with colon lesions that were not amenable to snare polypectomy were evaluated for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Snare tip resection was performed in select patients with lesions that lifted adequately after submucosal injection. Patients who underwent hybrid resections with endoscopic mucosal dissection were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES En bloc resection rates, operative time, perioperative complications, and short-term outcomes such as length of stay and lesion recurrence on follow-up colonoscopy were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 121 patients underwent snare tip endoscopic submucosal dissection, with a mean lesion size of 28.8 ± 9.84 mm. Most procedures were performed in the endoscopy suite (81.8%). The en bloc resection rate was 81.8% with an average procedure time of 37.1 ± 29.8 min. There were two perforations (1.70%), one of which was managed operatively. Recurrence occurred in 6 patients (7.89%) at the time of follow-up colonoscopy. LIMITATIONS This study was retrospective, conducted by two skilled endoscopists with experience in endoscopic resection, and had short-term follow up. CONCLUSIONS Snare tip endoscopic submucosal dissection for advanced colon lesions demonstrates satisfactory short-term outcomes, suggesting its potential as a safe and accessible alternative to specialized knives, thereby possibly enhancing adoption of endoscopic resection and improving patient accessibility. See Video Abstract.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
572
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信