Michael J Klingler,Kamil Erozkan,Ali Alipouriani,Joshua Sommovilla,Emre Gorgun
{"title":"在复杂结肠病变的腔内治疗中使用卡环尖端内镜黏膜下剥离术","authors":"Michael J Klingler,Kamil Erozkan,Ali Alipouriani,Joshua Sommovilla,Emre Gorgun","doi":"10.1097/dcr.0000000000003526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nEndoscopic submucosal dissection for advanced colon lesions is typically performed with specialized and costly endoscopic knives, potentially limiting accessibility and increasing procedural cost. Alternatively, the tip of an endoscopic snare, which is inexpensive and universally available, has demonstrated safe and efficient use in gastric lesions but lacks sufficient data for use in colon lesions.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nThis study aimed to assess patient outcomes following endoscopic submucosal dissection of advanced colon lesions using the endoscopic snare tip.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nA retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database at a single tertiary care center was conducted.\r\n\r\nSETTINGS\r\nThis study was conducted at a single tertiary care center.\r\n\r\nPATIENTS\r\nAdult patients with colon lesions that were not amenable to snare polypectomy were evaluated for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Snare tip resection was performed in select patients with lesions that lifted adequately after submucosal injection. Patients who underwent hybrid resections with endoscopic mucosal dissection were excluded.\r\n\r\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\r\nEn bloc resection rates, operative time, perioperative complications, and short-term outcomes such as length of stay and lesion recurrence on follow-up colonoscopy were evaluated.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 121 patients underwent snare tip endoscopic submucosal dissection, with a mean lesion size of 28.8 ± 9.84 mm. Most procedures were performed in the endoscopy suite (81.8%). The en bloc resection rate was 81.8% with an average procedure time of 37.1 ± 29.8 min. There were two perforations (1.70%), one of which was managed operatively. Recurrence occurred in 6 patients (7.89%) at the time of follow-up colonoscopy.\r\n\r\nLIMITATIONS\r\nThis study was retrospective, conducted by two skilled endoscopists with experience in endoscopic resection, and had short-term follow up.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nSnare tip endoscopic submucosal dissection for advanced colon lesions demonstrates satisfactory short-term outcomes, suggesting its potential as a safe and accessible alternative to specialized knives, thereby possibly enhancing adoption of endoscopic resection and improving patient accessibility. See Video Abstract.","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Snare Tip Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Endoluminal Management of Complex Colon Lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Michael J Klingler,Kamil Erozkan,Ali Alipouriani,Joshua Sommovilla,Emre Gorgun\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/dcr.0000000000003526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nEndoscopic submucosal dissection for advanced colon lesions is typically performed with specialized and costly endoscopic knives, potentially limiting accessibility and increasing procedural cost. Alternatively, the tip of an endoscopic snare, which is inexpensive and universally available, has demonstrated safe and efficient use in gastric lesions but lacks sufficient data for use in colon lesions.\\r\\n\\r\\nOBJECTIVE\\r\\nThis study aimed to assess patient outcomes following endoscopic submucosal dissection of advanced colon lesions using the endoscopic snare tip.\\r\\n\\r\\nDESIGN\\r\\nA retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database at a single tertiary care center was conducted.\\r\\n\\r\\nSETTINGS\\r\\nThis study was conducted at a single tertiary care center.\\r\\n\\r\\nPATIENTS\\r\\nAdult patients with colon lesions that were not amenable to snare polypectomy were evaluated for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Snare tip resection was performed in select patients with lesions that lifted adequately after submucosal injection. Patients who underwent hybrid resections with endoscopic mucosal dissection were excluded.\\r\\n\\r\\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\\r\\nEn bloc resection rates, operative time, perioperative complications, and short-term outcomes such as length of stay and lesion recurrence on follow-up colonoscopy were evaluated.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nA total of 121 patients underwent snare tip endoscopic submucosal dissection, with a mean lesion size of 28.8 ± 9.84 mm. Most procedures were performed in the endoscopy suite (81.8%). The en bloc resection rate was 81.8% with an average procedure time of 37.1 ± 29.8 min. There were two perforations (1.70%), one of which was managed operatively. Recurrence occurred in 6 patients (7.89%) at the time of follow-up colonoscopy.\\r\\n\\r\\nLIMITATIONS\\r\\nThis study was retrospective, conducted by two skilled endoscopists with experience in endoscopic resection, and had short-term follow up.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nSnare tip endoscopic submucosal dissection for advanced colon lesions demonstrates satisfactory short-term outcomes, suggesting its potential as a safe and accessible alternative to specialized knives, thereby possibly enhancing adoption of endoscopic resection and improving patient accessibility. See Video Abstract.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000003526\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000003526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Use of Snare Tip Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Endoluminal Management of Complex Colon Lesions.
BACKGROUND
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for advanced colon lesions is typically performed with specialized and costly endoscopic knives, potentially limiting accessibility and increasing procedural cost. Alternatively, the tip of an endoscopic snare, which is inexpensive and universally available, has demonstrated safe and efficient use in gastric lesions but lacks sufficient data for use in colon lesions.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to assess patient outcomes following endoscopic submucosal dissection of advanced colon lesions using the endoscopic snare tip.
DESIGN
A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database at a single tertiary care center was conducted.
SETTINGS
This study was conducted at a single tertiary care center.
PATIENTS
Adult patients with colon lesions that were not amenable to snare polypectomy were evaluated for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Snare tip resection was performed in select patients with lesions that lifted adequately after submucosal injection. Patients who underwent hybrid resections with endoscopic mucosal dissection were excluded.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
En bloc resection rates, operative time, perioperative complications, and short-term outcomes such as length of stay and lesion recurrence on follow-up colonoscopy were evaluated.
RESULTS
A total of 121 patients underwent snare tip endoscopic submucosal dissection, with a mean lesion size of 28.8 ± 9.84 mm. Most procedures were performed in the endoscopy suite (81.8%). The en bloc resection rate was 81.8% with an average procedure time of 37.1 ± 29.8 min. There were two perforations (1.70%), one of which was managed operatively. Recurrence occurred in 6 patients (7.89%) at the time of follow-up colonoscopy.
LIMITATIONS
This study was retrospective, conducted by two skilled endoscopists with experience in endoscopic resection, and had short-term follow up.
CONCLUSIONS
Snare tip endoscopic submucosal dissection for advanced colon lesions demonstrates satisfactory short-term outcomes, suggesting its potential as a safe and accessible alternative to specialized knives, thereby possibly enhancing adoption of endoscopic resection and improving patient accessibility. See Video Abstract.
期刊介绍:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.