不含丝裂霉素 C 的定制化经皮层 PRK 结合加速角膜交联与单纯角膜交联术后角膜混浊的前瞻性客观分析。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Shady T Awwad,Yara Bteich,Jad F Assaf,Andre Ghosn,Farhad Hafezi,Emilio Torres-Netto,Lily M Chacra,Karim Kozhaya
{"title":"不含丝裂霉素 C 的定制化经皮层 PRK 结合加速角膜交联与单纯角膜交联术后角膜混浊的前瞻性客观分析。","authors":"Shady T Awwad,Yara Bteich,Jad F Assaf,Andre Ghosn,Farhad Hafezi,Emilio Torres-Netto,Lily M Chacra,Karim Kozhaya","doi":"10.3928/1081597x-20240715-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nTo compare haze and refractive outcomes in patients undergoing combined accelerated corneal cross-linking (A-CXL) and selective wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (WG-transPRK) without mitomycin C (MMC) versus those undergoing A-CXL.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis prospective study analyzed 95 eyes (86 patients) with progressive keratoconus from October 2018 to October 2022. The first group underwent CXL combined with corneal or ocular WG-transPRK (CXL+PRK, n = 52), targeting higher order aberrations (HOAs). The second underwent CXL only (n = 43), both following the same accelerated CXL protocol without MMC on the SCHWIND Amaris laser platform (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions). Baseline and postoperative evaluations (1, 3, 6, and 12 months) included uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, manifest refraction, tomography, corneal HOAs, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans. A patented machine learning algorithm objectively detected and quantified stromal haze on OCT scans in grayscale units.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nIn both groups, anterior corneal haze reflectivity and subepithelial haze peaked at 3 months postoperatively, then progressively decreased at 6 and 12 months. Haze did not differ between groups at any time point. By 12 months, CDVA increased by 2.5 lines in the CXL+PRK group (P < .001) and by 0.7 lines in the CXL group (P = .10), and maximum keratometry decreased from 51.70 ± 5.10 to 47.90 ± 7.90 diopters (D) (CXL+PRK group) (P < .001) and from 51.20 ± 5.10 to 50.30 ± 4.60 D (CXL group) (P = .004). Corneal HOAs decreased in both groups but more in the CXL+PRK group.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nCombining CXL with WG-transPRK without MMC does not result in increased haze when compared to A-CXL alone. This combined approach achieves greater improvements in visual, topographic, and aberrometric parameters. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e583-e594.].","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"e583-e594"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective Objective Analysis of Corneal Haze Following Customized Transepithelial PRK Without Mitomycin C Combined With Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking Versus Corneal Cross-Linking Alone.\",\"authors\":\"Shady T Awwad,Yara Bteich,Jad F Assaf,Andre Ghosn,Farhad Hafezi,Emilio Torres-Netto,Lily M Chacra,Karim Kozhaya\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597x-20240715-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nTo compare haze and refractive outcomes in patients undergoing combined accelerated corneal cross-linking (A-CXL) and selective wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (WG-transPRK) without mitomycin C (MMC) versus those undergoing A-CXL.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThis prospective study analyzed 95 eyes (86 patients) with progressive keratoconus from October 2018 to October 2022. The first group underwent CXL combined with corneal or ocular WG-transPRK (CXL+PRK, n = 52), targeting higher order aberrations (HOAs). The second underwent CXL only (n = 43), both following the same accelerated CXL protocol without MMC on the SCHWIND Amaris laser platform (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions). Baseline and postoperative evaluations (1, 3, 6, and 12 months) included uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, manifest refraction, tomography, corneal HOAs, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans. A patented machine learning algorithm objectively detected and quantified stromal haze on OCT scans in grayscale units.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nIn both groups, anterior corneal haze reflectivity and subepithelial haze peaked at 3 months postoperatively, then progressively decreased at 6 and 12 months. Haze did not differ between groups at any time point. By 12 months, CDVA increased by 2.5 lines in the CXL+PRK group (P < .001) and by 0.7 lines in the CXL group (P = .10), and maximum keratometry decreased from 51.70 ± 5.10 to 47.90 ± 7.90 diopters (D) (CXL+PRK group) (P < .001) and from 51.20 ± 5.10 to 50.30 ± 4.60 D (CXL group) (P = .004). Corneal HOAs decreased in both groups but more in the CXL+PRK group.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nCombining CXL with WG-transPRK without MMC does not result in increased haze when compared to A-CXL alone. This combined approach achieves greater improvements in visual, topographic, and aberrometric parameters. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e583-e594.].\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"e583-e594\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20240715-03\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20240715-03","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较接受联合加速角膜交联术(A-CXL)和选择性波前引导经上皮光屈光性角膜切除术(WG-transPRK)而不接受丝裂霉素 C(MMC)的患者与接受 A-CXL 的患者的雾度和屈光结果。方法这项前瞻性研究分析了 2018 年 10 月至 2022 年 10 月期间 95 只患有进行性角膜炎的眼睛(86 例患者)。第一组接受CXL联合角膜或眼球WG-transPRK(CXL+PRK,n = 52),针对高阶像差(HOA)。第二组仅进行了 CXL(n = 43),两组均在 SCHWIND Amaris 激光平台(SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions)上采用相同的加速 CXL 方案,不使用 MMC。基线和术后评估(1、3、6 和 12 个月)包括未矫正(UDVA)和矫正(CDVA)远距离视力、明显屈光度、断层扫描、角膜 HOAs 和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)。结果两组患者的角膜前部雾度反射率和上皮下雾度在术后 3 个月达到峰值,然后在 6 个月和 12 个月逐渐降低。两组患者在任何时间点的混浊度均无差异。到 12 个月时,CXL+PRK 组的 CDVA 增加了 2.5 行(P < .001),CXL 组增加了 0.7 行(P = .10),最大角膜屈光度从 51.70 ± 5.10 降至 47.90 ± 7.90 屈光度(D)(CXL+PRK 组)(P < .001),最大角膜屈光度从 51.20 ± 5.10 降至 50.30 ± 4.60 D(CXL 组)(P = .004)。结论与单用 A-CXL 相比,将 CXL 与不含 MMC 的 WG-transPRK 结合使用不会导致雾度增加。这种联合方法在视觉、地形和像差参数方面都有更大的改善。[J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e583-e594]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective Objective Analysis of Corneal Haze Following Customized Transepithelial PRK Without Mitomycin C Combined With Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking Versus Corneal Cross-Linking Alone.
PURPOSE To compare haze and refractive outcomes in patients undergoing combined accelerated corneal cross-linking (A-CXL) and selective wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (WG-transPRK) without mitomycin C (MMC) versus those undergoing A-CXL. METHODS This prospective study analyzed 95 eyes (86 patients) with progressive keratoconus from October 2018 to October 2022. The first group underwent CXL combined with corneal or ocular WG-transPRK (CXL+PRK, n = 52), targeting higher order aberrations (HOAs). The second underwent CXL only (n = 43), both following the same accelerated CXL protocol without MMC on the SCHWIND Amaris laser platform (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions). Baseline and postoperative evaluations (1, 3, 6, and 12 months) included uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, manifest refraction, tomography, corneal HOAs, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans. A patented machine learning algorithm objectively detected and quantified stromal haze on OCT scans in grayscale units. RESULTS In both groups, anterior corneal haze reflectivity and subepithelial haze peaked at 3 months postoperatively, then progressively decreased at 6 and 12 months. Haze did not differ between groups at any time point. By 12 months, CDVA increased by 2.5 lines in the CXL+PRK group (P < .001) and by 0.7 lines in the CXL group (P = .10), and maximum keratometry decreased from 51.70 ± 5.10 to 47.90 ± 7.90 diopters (D) (CXL+PRK group) (P < .001) and from 51.20 ± 5.10 to 50.30 ± 4.60 D (CXL group) (P = .004). Corneal HOAs decreased in both groups but more in the CXL+PRK group. CONCLUSIONS Combining CXL with WG-transPRK without MMC does not result in increased haze when compared to A-CXL alone. This combined approach achieves greater improvements in visual, topographic, and aberrometric parameters. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e583-e594.].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信