利用深度学习模型分析原发性角闭合疑似症的前段情况

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Ziwei Fu, Jinwei Xi, Zhi Ji, Ruxue Zhang, Jianping Wang, Rui Shi, Xiaoli Pu, Jingni Yu, Fang Xue, Jianrong Liu, Yanrong Wang, Hua Zhong, Jun Feng, Min Zhang, Yuan He
{"title":"利用深度学习模型分析原发性角闭合疑似症的前段情况","authors":"Ziwei Fu, Jinwei Xi, Zhi Ji, Ruxue Zhang, Jianping Wang, Rui Shi, Xiaoli Pu, Jingni Yu, Fang Xue, Jianrong Liu, Yanrong Wang, Hua Zhong, Jun Feng, Min Zhang, Yuan He","doi":"10.1186/s12911-024-02658-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To analyze primary angle closure suspect (PACS) patients’ anatomical characteristics of anterior chamber configuration, and to establish artificial intelligence (AI)-aided diagnostic system for PACS screening. A total of 1668 scans of 839 patients were included in this cross-sectional study. The subjects were divided into two groups: PACS group and normal group. With anterior segment optical coherence tomography scans, the anatomical diversity between two groups was compared, and anterior segment structure features of PACS were extracted. Then, AI-aided diagnostic system was constructed, which based different algorithms such as classification and regression tree (CART), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), VGG-16 and Alexnet. Then the diagnostic efficiencies of different algorithms were evaluated, and compared with junior physicians and experienced ophthalmologists. RF [sensitivity (Se) = 0.84; specificity (Sp) = 0.92; positive predict value (PPV) = 0.82; negative predict value (NPV) = 0.95; area under the curve (AUC) = 0.90] and CART (Se = 0.76, Sp = 0.93, PPV = 0.85, NPV = 0.92, AUC = 0.90) showed better performance than LR (Se = 0.68, Sp = 0.91, PPV = 0.79, NPV = 0.90, AUC = 0.86). In convolutional neural networks (CNN), Alexnet (Se = 0.83, Sp = 0.95, PPV = 0.92, NPV = 0.87, AUC = 0.85) was better than VGG-16 (Se = 0.84, Sp = 0.90, PPV = 0.85, NPV = 0.90, AUC = 0.79). The performance of 2 CNN algorithms was better than 5 junior physicians, and the mean value of diagnostic indicators of 2 CNN algorithm was similar to experienced ophthalmologists. PACS patients have distinct anatomical characteristics compared with health controls. AI models for PACS screening are reliable and powerful, equivalent to experienced ophthalmologists.","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of anterior segment in primary angle closure suspect with deep learning models\",\"authors\":\"Ziwei Fu, Jinwei Xi, Zhi Ji, Ruxue Zhang, Jianping Wang, Rui Shi, Xiaoli Pu, Jingni Yu, Fang Xue, Jianrong Liu, Yanrong Wang, Hua Zhong, Jun Feng, Min Zhang, Yuan He\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12911-024-02658-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To analyze primary angle closure suspect (PACS) patients’ anatomical characteristics of anterior chamber configuration, and to establish artificial intelligence (AI)-aided diagnostic system for PACS screening. A total of 1668 scans of 839 patients were included in this cross-sectional study. The subjects were divided into two groups: PACS group and normal group. With anterior segment optical coherence tomography scans, the anatomical diversity between two groups was compared, and anterior segment structure features of PACS were extracted. Then, AI-aided diagnostic system was constructed, which based different algorithms such as classification and regression tree (CART), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), VGG-16 and Alexnet. Then the diagnostic efficiencies of different algorithms were evaluated, and compared with junior physicians and experienced ophthalmologists. RF [sensitivity (Se) = 0.84; specificity (Sp) = 0.92; positive predict value (PPV) = 0.82; negative predict value (NPV) = 0.95; area under the curve (AUC) = 0.90] and CART (Se = 0.76, Sp = 0.93, PPV = 0.85, NPV = 0.92, AUC = 0.90) showed better performance than LR (Se = 0.68, Sp = 0.91, PPV = 0.79, NPV = 0.90, AUC = 0.86). In convolutional neural networks (CNN), Alexnet (Se = 0.83, Sp = 0.95, PPV = 0.92, NPV = 0.87, AUC = 0.85) was better than VGG-16 (Se = 0.84, Sp = 0.90, PPV = 0.85, NPV = 0.90, AUC = 0.79). The performance of 2 CNN algorithms was better than 5 junior physicians, and the mean value of diagnostic indicators of 2 CNN algorithm was similar to experienced ophthalmologists. PACS patients have distinct anatomical characteristics compared with health controls. AI models for PACS screening are reliable and powerful, equivalent to experienced ophthalmologists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02658-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02658-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分析原发性闭角型疑似病例(PACS)前房构型的解剖学特征,并建立人工智能(AI)辅助诊断系统用于PACS筛查。这项横断面研究共纳入了 839 名患者的 1668 次扫描。研究对象分为两组:PACS 组和正常组。通过前段光学相干断层扫描,比较两组之间的解剖多样性,并提取 PACS 的前段结构特征。然后,构建了基于分类回归树(CART)、随机森林(RF)、逻辑回归(LR)、VGG-16 和 Alexnet 等不同算法的人工智能辅助诊断系统。然后评估了不同算法的诊断效率,并与初级医师和经验丰富的眼科医师进行了比较。RF[灵敏度(Se)= 0.84;特异度(Sp)= 0.92;阳性预测值(PPV)= 0.82;阴性预测值(NPV)= 0.95;曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.90]和 CART(Se = 0.76,Sp = 0.93,PPV = 0.85,NPV = 0.92,AUC = 0.90)的性能优于 LR(Se = 0.68,Sp = 0.91,PPV = 0.79,NPV = 0.90,AUC = 0.86)。在卷积神经网络(CNN)中,Alexnet(Se = 0.83,Sp = 0.95,PPV = 0.92,NPV = 0.87,AUC = 0.85)优于 VGG-16(Se = 0.84,Sp = 0.90,PPV = 0.85,NPV = 0.90,AUC = 0.79)。2 种 CNN 算法的性能优于 5 位初级医师,而 2 种 CNN 算法的诊断指标平均值与经验丰富的眼科医师相近。与健康对照组相比,PACS 患者具有明显的解剖学特征。用于PACS筛查的人工智能模型可靠且功能强大,与经验丰富的眼科医生相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of anterior segment in primary angle closure suspect with deep learning models
To analyze primary angle closure suspect (PACS) patients’ anatomical characteristics of anterior chamber configuration, and to establish artificial intelligence (AI)-aided diagnostic system for PACS screening. A total of 1668 scans of 839 patients were included in this cross-sectional study. The subjects were divided into two groups: PACS group and normal group. With anterior segment optical coherence tomography scans, the anatomical diversity between two groups was compared, and anterior segment structure features of PACS were extracted. Then, AI-aided diagnostic system was constructed, which based different algorithms such as classification and regression tree (CART), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), VGG-16 and Alexnet. Then the diagnostic efficiencies of different algorithms were evaluated, and compared with junior physicians and experienced ophthalmologists. RF [sensitivity (Se) = 0.84; specificity (Sp) = 0.92; positive predict value (PPV) = 0.82; negative predict value (NPV) = 0.95; area under the curve (AUC) = 0.90] and CART (Se = 0.76, Sp = 0.93, PPV = 0.85, NPV = 0.92, AUC = 0.90) showed better performance than LR (Se = 0.68, Sp = 0.91, PPV = 0.79, NPV = 0.90, AUC = 0.86). In convolutional neural networks (CNN), Alexnet (Se = 0.83, Sp = 0.95, PPV = 0.92, NPV = 0.87, AUC = 0.85) was better than VGG-16 (Se = 0.84, Sp = 0.90, PPV = 0.85, NPV = 0.90, AUC = 0.79). The performance of 2 CNN algorithms was better than 5 junior physicians, and the mean value of diagnostic indicators of 2 CNN algorithm was similar to experienced ophthalmologists. PACS patients have distinct anatomical characteristics compared with health controls. AI models for PACS screening are reliable and powerful, equivalent to experienced ophthalmologists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信