Matthias Albrechts , Ivan Tsonev , Annemie Bogaerts
{"title":"等离子体后注入 CH4 能否改善甲烷的等离子体干转化?模型研究","authors":"Matthias Albrechts , Ivan Tsonev , Annemie Bogaerts","doi":"10.1039/d4gc02889a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thermal plasma-driven dry reforming of methane (DRM) has gained increased attention in recent years due to its high conversion and energy conversion efficiency (ECE). Recent experimental work investigated the performance of a pure CO<sub>2</sub> plasma with post-plasma CH<sub>4</sub> injection. The rationale behind this strategy is that by utilizing a pure CO<sub>2</sub> plasma, all plasma energy can be used to dissociate CO<sub>2</sub>, while CH<sub>4</sub> reforming proceeds post-plasma in the reforming reactor with residual heat, potentially improving the energy efficiency compared to injecting both CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> into the plasma. To assess whether post-plasma CH<sub>4</sub> injection indeed improves the DRM performance, we developed a chemical kinetics model describing the post-plasma conversion process. We first validated our model by reproducing the experimental results of the pure CO<sub>2</sub> plasma with post-plasma CH<sub>4</sub> injection. Subsequently, we compared both strategies: injecting only CO<sub>2</sub> inside the plasma while injecting CH<sub>4</sub> post-plasma, <em>vs.</em> classical plasma-based DRM. Our modeling results indicate that below specific energy inputs (SEI) of 220 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup>, the total conversion slightly improves (<em>ca.</em> 5%) with the first strategy. However, the ECE is slightly lower due to the low H<sub>2</sub> selectivity caused by substantial H<sub>2</sub>O formation. The highest conversion and ECE are obtained at SEI values of 240–280 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup>, where both strategies yield nearly identical results, indicating the limited potential of improving the performance of DRM by pure CO<sub>2</sub> plasma with post-plasma CH<sub>4</sub> injection. Nevertheless, the approach is still very valuable to allow higher CH<sub>4</sub>/CO<sub>2</sub> ratios without problems of coke formation within the plasma, and thus, to improve plasma stability and reach higher syngas ratios, which is more useful for further Fischer–Tropsch or methanol synthesis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":78,"journal":{"name":"Green Chemistry","volume":"26 18","pages":"Pages 9712-9728"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can post-plasma CH4 injection improve plasma-based dry reforming of methane? A modeling study\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Albrechts , Ivan Tsonev , Annemie Bogaerts\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/d4gc02889a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Thermal plasma-driven dry reforming of methane (DRM) has gained increased attention in recent years due to its high conversion and energy conversion efficiency (ECE). Recent experimental work investigated the performance of a pure CO<sub>2</sub> plasma with post-plasma CH<sub>4</sub> injection. The rationale behind this strategy is that by utilizing a pure CO<sub>2</sub> plasma, all plasma energy can be used to dissociate CO<sub>2</sub>, while CH<sub>4</sub> reforming proceeds post-plasma in the reforming reactor with residual heat, potentially improving the energy efficiency compared to injecting both CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> into the plasma. To assess whether post-plasma CH<sub>4</sub> injection indeed improves the DRM performance, we developed a chemical kinetics model describing the post-plasma conversion process. We first validated our model by reproducing the experimental results of the pure CO<sub>2</sub> plasma with post-plasma CH<sub>4</sub> injection. Subsequently, we compared both strategies: injecting only CO<sub>2</sub> inside the plasma while injecting CH<sub>4</sub> post-plasma, <em>vs.</em> classical plasma-based DRM. Our modeling results indicate that below specific energy inputs (SEI) of 220 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup>, the total conversion slightly improves (<em>ca.</em> 5%) with the first strategy. However, the ECE is slightly lower due to the low H<sub>2</sub> selectivity caused by substantial H<sub>2</sub>O formation. The highest conversion and ECE are obtained at SEI values of 240–280 kJ mol<sup>−1</sup>, where both strategies yield nearly identical results, indicating the limited potential of improving the performance of DRM by pure CO<sub>2</sub> plasma with post-plasma CH<sub>4</sub> injection. Nevertheless, the approach is still very valuable to allow higher CH<sub>4</sub>/CO<sub>2</sub> ratios without problems of coke formation within the plasma, and thus, to improve plasma stability and reach higher syngas ratios, which is more useful for further Fischer–Tropsch or methanol synthesis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":78,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Green Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"26 18\",\"pages\":\"Pages 9712-9728\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Green Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1463926224007374\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1463926224007374","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
近年来,热等离子体驱动的甲烷干重整(DRM)因其高转化率和能量转换效率(ECE)而日益受到关注。最近的实验工作研究了等离子体后注入 CH4 的纯 CO2 等离子体的性能。采用这种策略的理由是,通过利用纯 CO2 等离子体,所有等离子体能量都可用于解离 CO2,而 CH4 重整则在重整反应器中利用余热进行等离子体后重整,与将 CO2 和 CH4 同时注入等离子体相比,有可能提高能效。为了评估等离子体后注入 CH4 是否确实提高了 DRM 的性能,我们开发了一个描述等离子体后转化过程的化学动力学模型。我们首先通过再现纯 CO2 等离子体与等离子体后注入 CH4 的实验结果来验证我们的模型。随后,我们比较了两种策略:仅在等离子体内注入 CO2,同时在等离子体后注入 CH4,以及传统的基于等离子体的 DRM。我们的建模结果表明,在比能量输入(SEI)低于 220 kJ mol-1 的情况下,第一种策略的总转化率略有提高(约 5%)。但是,由于大量 H2O 的形成导致 H2 选择性较低,因此 ECE 略低。在 SEI 值为 240-280 kJ mol-1 时,转化率和 ECE 最高,两种方法的结果几乎相同,这表明通过纯 CO2 等离子体和等离子体后注入 CH4 来提高 DRM 性能的潜力有限。尽管如此,这种方法仍然非常有价值,因为它可以提高 CH4/CO2 比率,而不会出现等离子体内形成焦炭的问题,从而提高等离子体的稳定性,达到更高的合成气比率,这对进一步的费托合成或甲醇合成更有用。
Can post-plasma CH4 injection improve plasma-based dry reforming of methane? A modeling study
Thermal plasma-driven dry reforming of methane (DRM) has gained increased attention in recent years due to its high conversion and energy conversion efficiency (ECE). Recent experimental work investigated the performance of a pure CO2 plasma with post-plasma CH4 injection. The rationale behind this strategy is that by utilizing a pure CO2 plasma, all plasma energy can be used to dissociate CO2, while CH4 reforming proceeds post-plasma in the reforming reactor with residual heat, potentially improving the energy efficiency compared to injecting both CO2 and CH4 into the plasma. To assess whether post-plasma CH4 injection indeed improves the DRM performance, we developed a chemical kinetics model describing the post-plasma conversion process. We first validated our model by reproducing the experimental results of the pure CO2 plasma with post-plasma CH4 injection. Subsequently, we compared both strategies: injecting only CO2 inside the plasma while injecting CH4 post-plasma, vs. classical plasma-based DRM. Our modeling results indicate that below specific energy inputs (SEI) of 220 kJ mol−1, the total conversion slightly improves (ca. 5%) with the first strategy. However, the ECE is slightly lower due to the low H2 selectivity caused by substantial H2O formation. The highest conversion and ECE are obtained at SEI values of 240–280 kJ mol−1, where both strategies yield nearly identical results, indicating the limited potential of improving the performance of DRM by pure CO2 plasma with post-plasma CH4 injection. Nevertheless, the approach is still very valuable to allow higher CH4/CO2 ratios without problems of coke formation within the plasma, and thus, to improve plasma stability and reach higher syngas ratios, which is more useful for further Fischer–Tropsch or methanol synthesis.
期刊介绍:
Green Chemistry is a journal that provides a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative green and sustainable technologies. The scope of Green Chemistry is based on the definition proposed by Anastas and Warner (Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, P T Anastas and J C Warner, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998), which defines green chemistry as the utilisation of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture and application of chemical products. Green Chemistry aims to reduce the environmental impact of the chemical enterprise by developing a technology base that is inherently non-toxic to living things and the environment. The journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of research relating to this endeavor and publishes original and significant cutting-edge research that is likely to be of wide general appeal. For a work to be published, it must present a significant advance in green chemistry, including a comparison with existing methods and a demonstration of advantages over those methods.