不同的风险-不同的观点:氢能基础设施如何与社会风险意识相关联

IF 3.6 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Jan Hildebrand, Pantea Sadat‐Razavi, Irina Rau
{"title":"不同的风险-不同的观点:氢能基础设施如何与社会风险意识相关联","authors":"Jan Hildebrand, Pantea Sadat‐Razavi, Irina Rau","doi":"10.1002/ente.202300998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Herein, risk perception as one relevant factor for public acceptance and examines the different levels of risk that play a role in the evaluation of new technologies and links them to the current societal discourses on the development of a hydrogen economy is addressed. The conceptual framework is based on a holistic understanding of risk that goes beyond mere technology assessment and also includes systemic risks along the value chain; different stakeholder perspectives are also addressed. Thus, the results of a media analysis are combined with the results of a representative survey in Germany. Results show a rather low risk perception of hydrogen in the public combined with a high degree of uncertainty in the respective risk estimation. Systemic risks like security of supply or increasing energy costs are perceived more strongly compared to accidental risks from hydrogen infrastructure, whereas for the public acceptance potential health risks show the strongest correlation. Overall, the study shows the relevance of risk considerations in the introduction of new technologies and accompanying communication measures.","PeriodicalId":11573,"journal":{"name":"Energy technology","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different Risks—Different Views: How Hydrogen Infrastructure Is Linked to Societal Risk Perception\",\"authors\":\"Jan Hildebrand, Pantea Sadat‐Razavi, Irina Rau\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ente.202300998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Herein, risk perception as one relevant factor for public acceptance and examines the different levels of risk that play a role in the evaluation of new technologies and links them to the current societal discourses on the development of a hydrogen economy is addressed. The conceptual framework is based on a holistic understanding of risk that goes beyond mere technology assessment and also includes systemic risks along the value chain; different stakeholder perspectives are also addressed. Thus, the results of a media analysis are combined with the results of a representative survey in Germany. Results show a rather low risk perception of hydrogen in the public combined with a high degree of uncertainty in the respective risk estimation. Systemic risks like security of supply or increasing energy costs are perceived more strongly compared to accidental risks from hydrogen infrastructure, whereas for the public acceptance potential health risks show the strongest correlation. Overall, the study shows the relevance of risk considerations in the introduction of new technologies and accompanying communication measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy technology\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.202300998\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.202300998","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这里,风险意识是影响公众接受程度的一个相关因素,研究了在新技术评估中发挥作用的不同风险水平,并将其与当前社会上关于氢经济发展的讨论联系起来。概念框架基于对风险的整体理解,超越了单纯的技术评估,还包括价值链上的系统性风险;同时还涉及不同利益相关者的观点。因此,将媒体分析的结果与德国代表性调查的结果相结合。结果表明,公众对氢气的风险认知度较低,同时在相应的风险评估中存在很大的不确定性。与氢基础设施的意外风险相比,人们对供应安全或能源成本增加等系统性风险的感知更为强烈,而对公众接受度而言,潜在的健康风险显示出最强的相关性。总之,这项研究表明,在引进新技术和采取相应的宣传措施时,风险因素具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Different Risks—Different Views: How Hydrogen Infrastructure Is Linked to Societal Risk Perception
Herein, risk perception as one relevant factor for public acceptance and examines the different levels of risk that play a role in the evaluation of new technologies and links them to the current societal discourses on the development of a hydrogen economy is addressed. The conceptual framework is based on a holistic understanding of risk that goes beyond mere technology assessment and also includes systemic risks along the value chain; different stakeholder perspectives are also addressed. Thus, the results of a media analysis are combined with the results of a representative survey in Germany. Results show a rather low risk perception of hydrogen in the public combined with a high degree of uncertainty in the respective risk estimation. Systemic risks like security of supply or increasing energy costs are perceived more strongly compared to accidental risks from hydrogen infrastructure, whereas for the public acceptance potential health risks show the strongest correlation. Overall, the study shows the relevance of risk considerations in the introduction of new technologies and accompanying communication measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy technology
Energy technology ENERGY & FUELS-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: Energy Technology provides a forum for researchers and engineers from all relevant disciplines concerned with the generation, conversion, storage, and distribution of energy. This new journal shall publish articles covering all technical aspects of energy process engineering from different perspectives, e.g., new concepts of energy generation and conversion; design, operation, control, and optimization of processes for energy generation (e.g., carbon capture) and conversion of energy carriers; improvement of existing processes; combination of single components to systems for energy generation; design of systems for energy storage; production processes of fuels, e.g., hydrogen, electricity, petroleum, biobased fuels; concepts and design of devices for energy distribution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信