利用经典回归和软计算方法确定有限斜坡的防滑安全系数

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Bahram Nourani, Farzin Salmasi, Akram Abbaspour, Hadi Arvanaghi, John Abraham
{"title":"利用经典回归和软计算方法确定有限斜坡的防滑安全系数","authors":"Bahram Nourani, Farzin Salmasi, Akram Abbaspour, Hadi Arvanaghi, John Abraham","doi":"10.1007/s40996-024-01583-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Determining the factor of safety against sliding of slopes in engineering projects is a major challenges for civil engineers. A method that can provide an accurate estimation of sliding likelihood can be a significant aid to designers. In the first part of this study, formulae based on classical regression methods such as multiple linear regression (<i>MLR</i>), multiple non-linear regression (<i>MNLR</i>), and multivariate adaptive regression splines (<i>MARS</i>) to calculate the factor of safety (<span>\\(\\overline{{F }_{s}}\\)</span> <sub><i>LEM</i></sub>) of finite slopes are developed. In the second part, in order to develop soft computing methods for estimating <span>\\(\\overline{{F }_{s}}\\)</span> <sub><i>LEM</i>,</sub> from soft computing methods (boosted trees (<i>BT</i>) and gene expression programming (<i>GEP</i>)) and two regression methods (<i>MLR</i> and <i>MNLR</i>) data-driven based methods are used. Values of <span>\\(\\overline{{F }_{s}}\\)</span> <sub><i>LEM</i></sub> for development of classical regression and soft computing models are generated using the limit equilibrium methods (<i>LEMs</i>). To assess the performance of the proposed models, different statistical metrics such as <i>R</i><sup><i>2</i></sup>, <i>RMSE</i>, <i>RE</i>%, <i>MAE</i> and <i>NSE</i>, and graphical diagrams such as scatter plots, box plots, <i>RE</i>% plots and Taylor plots are used. Classical regression methods indicate that the results obtained from the <i>MARS</i> model is closer to the extracted results of the <i>MNLR</i> model. Moreover, the results showed that the performance of the <i>GEP</i> model with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.994, <i>RMSE</i> = 0.0381, <i>RE</i>% = 1.66%, <i>MAE</i> = 0.027 and <i>NSE</i> = 0.992 is better than the other soft computing models for estimating <span>\\(\\overline{{F }_{s}}\\)</span> <sub><i>LEM</i></sub>. Designers of simple slopes with homogenous and dry soils could consider using the proposed approaches as an alternative to traditional stability charts and limit equilibrium methods (<i>LEM</i>).</p>","PeriodicalId":14550,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of the Factor of Safety against Sliding of Finite Slopes Using Classical Regression and Soft Computing Approaches\",\"authors\":\"Bahram Nourani, Farzin Salmasi, Akram Abbaspour, Hadi Arvanaghi, John Abraham\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40996-024-01583-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Determining the factor of safety against sliding of slopes in engineering projects is a major challenges for civil engineers. A method that can provide an accurate estimation of sliding likelihood can be a significant aid to designers. In the first part of this study, formulae based on classical regression methods such as multiple linear regression (<i>MLR</i>), multiple non-linear regression (<i>MNLR</i>), and multivariate adaptive regression splines (<i>MARS</i>) to calculate the factor of safety (<span>\\\\(\\\\overline{{F }_{s}}\\\\)</span> <sub><i>LEM</i></sub>) of finite slopes are developed. In the second part, in order to develop soft computing methods for estimating <span>\\\\(\\\\overline{{F }_{s}}\\\\)</span> <sub><i>LEM</i>,</sub> from soft computing methods (boosted trees (<i>BT</i>) and gene expression programming (<i>GEP</i>)) and two regression methods (<i>MLR</i> and <i>MNLR</i>) data-driven based methods are used. Values of <span>\\\\(\\\\overline{{F }_{s}}\\\\)</span> <sub><i>LEM</i></sub> for development of classical regression and soft computing models are generated using the limit equilibrium methods (<i>LEMs</i>). To assess the performance of the proposed models, different statistical metrics such as <i>R</i><sup><i>2</i></sup>, <i>RMSE</i>, <i>RE</i>%, <i>MAE</i> and <i>NSE</i>, and graphical diagrams such as scatter plots, box plots, <i>RE</i>% plots and Taylor plots are used. Classical regression methods indicate that the results obtained from the <i>MARS</i> model is closer to the extracted results of the <i>MNLR</i> model. Moreover, the results showed that the performance of the <i>GEP</i> model with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.994, <i>RMSE</i> = 0.0381, <i>RE</i>% = 1.66%, <i>MAE</i> = 0.027 and <i>NSE</i> = 0.992 is better than the other soft computing models for estimating <span>\\\\(\\\\overline{{F }_{s}}\\\\)</span> <sub><i>LEM</i></sub>. Designers of simple slopes with homogenous and dry soils could consider using the proposed approaches as an alternative to traditional stability charts and limit equilibrium methods (<i>LEM</i>).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01583-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01583-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定工程项目中斜坡滑动的安全系数是土木工程师面临的一大挑战。一种能够准确估算滑动可能性的方法对设计人员有很大帮助。本研究的第一部分基于经典回归方法,如多元线性回归 (MLR)、多元非线性回归 (MNLR) 和多元自适应回归样条 (MARS),建立了计算有限斜坡安全系数 (\(\overline{F }_{s}}\) LEM) 的公式。在第二部分中,为了开发用于估计 \(\overline{{F }_{s}}\) LEM 的软计算方法,使用了基于数据驱动的软计算方法(助推树(BT)和基因表达编程(GEP))和两种回归方法(MLR 和 MNLR)。使用极限平衡法(LEMs)生成了用于开发经典回归模型和软计算模型的 LEM 值(\overline{F }_{s}}/)。为了评估所提出模型的性能,使用了不同的统计指标,如 R2、RMSE、RE%、MAE 和 NSE,以及图形图表,如散点图、方框图、RE% 图和泰勒图。经典回归方法表明,MARS 模型得到的结果更接近于 MNLR 模型提取的结果。此外,结果表明,GEP 模型的 R2 = 0.994、RMSE = 0.0381、RE% = 1.66%、MAE = 0.027 和 NSE = 0.992 的性能优于其他用于估计 \(\overline{{F }_{s}}\) LEM 的软计算模型。对于具有同质干土的简单边坡,设计人员可以考虑使用所提出的方法来替代传统的稳定性图表和极限平衡法(LEM)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Determination of the Factor of Safety against Sliding of Finite Slopes Using Classical Regression and Soft Computing Approaches

Determination of the Factor of Safety against Sliding of Finite Slopes Using Classical Regression and Soft Computing Approaches

Determining the factor of safety against sliding of slopes in engineering projects is a major challenges for civil engineers. A method that can provide an accurate estimation of sliding likelihood can be a significant aid to designers. In the first part of this study, formulae based on classical regression methods such as multiple linear regression (MLR), multiple non-linear regression (MNLR), and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) to calculate the factor of safety (\(\overline{{F }_{s}}\) LEM) of finite slopes are developed. In the second part, in order to develop soft computing methods for estimating \(\overline{{F }_{s}}\) LEM, from soft computing methods (boosted trees (BT) and gene expression programming (GEP)) and two regression methods (MLR and MNLR) data-driven based methods are used. Values of \(\overline{{F }_{s}}\) LEM for development of classical regression and soft computing models are generated using the limit equilibrium methods (LEMs). To assess the performance of the proposed models, different statistical metrics such as R2, RMSE, RE%, MAE and NSE, and graphical diagrams such as scatter plots, box plots, RE% plots and Taylor plots are used. Classical regression methods indicate that the results obtained from the MARS model is closer to the extracted results of the MNLR model. Moreover, the results showed that the performance of the GEP model with R2 = 0.994, RMSE = 0.0381, RE% = 1.66%, MAE = 0.027 and NSE = 0.992 is better than the other soft computing models for estimating \(\overline{{F }_{s}}\) LEM. Designers of simple slopes with homogenous and dry soils could consider using the proposed approaches as an alternative to traditional stability charts and limit equilibrium methods (LEM).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
203
期刊介绍: The aim of the Iranian Journal of Science and Technology is to foster the growth of scientific research among Iranian engineers and scientists and to provide a medium by means of which the fruits of these researches may be brought to the attention of the world’s civil Engineering communities. This transaction focuses on all aspects of Civil Engineering and will accept the original research contributions (previously unpublished) from all areas of established engineering disciplines. The papers may be theoretical, experimental or both. The journal publishes original papers within the broad field of civil engineering which include, but are not limited to, the following: -Structural engineering- Earthquake engineering- Concrete engineering- Construction management- Steel structures- Engineering mechanics- Water resources engineering- Hydraulic engineering- Hydraulic structures- Environmental engineering- Soil mechanics- Foundation engineering- Geotechnical engineering- Transportation engineering- Surveying and geomatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信