Bahram Nourani, Farzin Salmasi, Akram Abbaspour, Hadi Arvanaghi, John Abraham
{"title":"利用经典回归和软计算方法确定有限斜坡的防滑安全系数","authors":"Bahram Nourani, Farzin Salmasi, Akram Abbaspour, Hadi Arvanaghi, John Abraham","doi":"10.1007/s40996-024-01583-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Determining the factor of safety against sliding of slopes in engineering projects is a major challenges for civil engineers. A method that can provide an accurate estimation of sliding likelihood can be a significant aid to designers. In the first part of this study, formulae based on classical regression methods such as multiple linear regression (<i>MLR</i>), multiple non-linear regression (<i>MNLR</i>), and multivariate adaptive regression splines (<i>MARS</i>) to calculate the factor of safety (<span>\\(\\overline{{F }_{s}}\\)</span> <sub><i>LEM</i></sub>) of finite slopes are developed. In the second part, in order to develop soft computing methods for estimating <span>\\(\\overline{{F }_{s}}\\)</span> <sub><i>LEM</i>,</sub> from soft computing methods (boosted trees (<i>BT</i>) and gene expression programming (<i>GEP</i>)) and two regression methods (<i>MLR</i> and <i>MNLR</i>) data-driven based methods are used. Values of <span>\\(\\overline{{F }_{s}}\\)</span> <sub><i>LEM</i></sub> for development of classical regression and soft computing models are generated using the limit equilibrium methods (<i>LEMs</i>). To assess the performance of the proposed models, different statistical metrics such as <i>R</i><sup><i>2</i></sup>, <i>RMSE</i>, <i>RE</i>%, <i>MAE</i> and <i>NSE</i>, and graphical diagrams such as scatter plots, box plots, <i>RE</i>% plots and Taylor plots are used. Classical regression methods indicate that the results obtained from the <i>MARS</i> model is closer to the extracted results of the <i>MNLR</i> model. Moreover, the results showed that the performance of the <i>GEP</i> model with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.994, <i>RMSE</i> = 0.0381, <i>RE</i>% = 1.66%, <i>MAE</i> = 0.027 and <i>NSE</i> = 0.992 is better than the other soft computing models for estimating <span>\\(\\overline{{F }_{s}}\\)</span> <sub><i>LEM</i></sub>. Designers of simple slopes with homogenous and dry soils could consider using the proposed approaches as an alternative to traditional stability charts and limit equilibrium methods (<i>LEM</i>).</p>","PeriodicalId":14550,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of the Factor of Safety against Sliding of Finite Slopes Using Classical Regression and Soft Computing Approaches\",\"authors\":\"Bahram Nourani, Farzin Salmasi, Akram Abbaspour, Hadi Arvanaghi, John Abraham\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40996-024-01583-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Determining the factor of safety against sliding of slopes in engineering projects is a major challenges for civil engineers. A method that can provide an accurate estimation of sliding likelihood can be a significant aid to designers. In the first part of this study, formulae based on classical regression methods such as multiple linear regression (<i>MLR</i>), multiple non-linear regression (<i>MNLR</i>), and multivariate adaptive regression splines (<i>MARS</i>) to calculate the factor of safety (<span>\\\\(\\\\overline{{F }_{s}}\\\\)</span> <sub><i>LEM</i></sub>) of finite slopes are developed. In the second part, in order to develop soft computing methods for estimating <span>\\\\(\\\\overline{{F }_{s}}\\\\)</span> <sub><i>LEM</i>,</sub> from soft computing methods (boosted trees (<i>BT</i>) and gene expression programming (<i>GEP</i>)) and two regression methods (<i>MLR</i> and <i>MNLR</i>) data-driven based methods are used. Values of <span>\\\\(\\\\overline{{F }_{s}}\\\\)</span> <sub><i>LEM</i></sub> for development of classical regression and soft computing models are generated using the limit equilibrium methods (<i>LEMs</i>). To assess the performance of the proposed models, different statistical metrics such as <i>R</i><sup><i>2</i></sup>, <i>RMSE</i>, <i>RE</i>%, <i>MAE</i> and <i>NSE</i>, and graphical diagrams such as scatter plots, box plots, <i>RE</i>% plots and Taylor plots are used. Classical regression methods indicate that the results obtained from the <i>MARS</i> model is closer to the extracted results of the <i>MNLR</i> model. Moreover, the results showed that the performance of the <i>GEP</i> model with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.994, <i>RMSE</i> = 0.0381, <i>RE</i>% = 1.66%, <i>MAE</i> = 0.027 and <i>NSE</i> = 0.992 is better than the other soft computing models for estimating <span>\\\\(\\\\overline{{F }_{s}}\\\\)</span> <sub><i>LEM</i></sub>. Designers of simple slopes with homogenous and dry soils could consider using the proposed approaches as an alternative to traditional stability charts and limit equilibrium methods (<i>LEM</i>).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01583-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01583-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determination of the Factor of Safety against Sliding of Finite Slopes Using Classical Regression and Soft Computing Approaches
Determining the factor of safety against sliding of slopes in engineering projects is a major challenges for civil engineers. A method that can provide an accurate estimation of sliding likelihood can be a significant aid to designers. In the first part of this study, formulae based on classical regression methods such as multiple linear regression (MLR), multiple non-linear regression (MNLR), and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) to calculate the factor of safety (\(\overline{{F }_{s}}\)LEM) of finite slopes are developed. In the second part, in order to develop soft computing methods for estimating \(\overline{{F }_{s}}\)LEM, from soft computing methods (boosted trees (BT) and gene expression programming (GEP)) and two regression methods (MLR and MNLR) data-driven based methods are used. Values of \(\overline{{F }_{s}}\)LEM for development of classical regression and soft computing models are generated using the limit equilibrium methods (LEMs). To assess the performance of the proposed models, different statistical metrics such as R2, RMSE, RE%, MAE and NSE, and graphical diagrams such as scatter plots, box plots, RE% plots and Taylor plots are used. Classical regression methods indicate that the results obtained from the MARS model is closer to the extracted results of the MNLR model. Moreover, the results showed that the performance of the GEP model with R2 = 0.994, RMSE = 0.0381, RE% = 1.66%, MAE = 0.027 and NSE = 0.992 is better than the other soft computing models for estimating \(\overline{{F }_{s}}\)LEM. Designers of simple slopes with homogenous and dry soils could consider using the proposed approaches as an alternative to traditional stability charts and limit equilibrium methods (LEM).
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Iranian Journal of Science and Technology is to foster the growth of scientific research among Iranian engineers and scientists and to provide a medium by means of which the fruits of these researches may be brought to the attention of the world’s civil Engineering communities. This transaction focuses on all aspects of Civil Engineering
and will accept the original research contributions (previously unpublished) from all areas of established engineering disciplines. The papers may be theoretical, experimental or both. The journal publishes original papers within the broad field of civil engineering which include, but are not limited to, the following:
-Structural engineering-
Earthquake engineering-
Concrete engineering-
Construction management-
Steel structures-
Engineering mechanics-
Water resources engineering-
Hydraulic engineering-
Hydraulic structures-
Environmental engineering-
Soil mechanics-
Foundation engineering-
Geotechnical engineering-
Transportation engineering-
Surveying and geomatics.