抑郁症治疗对患有抑郁症且心血管风险升高的初级保健患者的健康行为和心血管风险因素的影响:来自 eIMPACT 试验的数据

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Matthew D. Schuiling, Aubrey L. Shell, Christopher M. Callahan, John I. Nurnberger, Krysha L. MacDonald, Robert V. Considine, Wei Wu, Adam T. Hirsh, Christopher A. Crawford, Michelle K. Williams, Timothy C. Lipuma, Samir K. Gupta, Richard J. Kovacs, Bruce L. Rollman, Jesse C. Stewart
{"title":"抑郁症治疗对患有抑郁症且心血管风险升高的初级保健患者的健康行为和心血管风险因素的影响:来自 eIMPACT 试验的数据","authors":"Matthew D. Schuiling, Aubrey L. Shell, Christopher M. Callahan, John I. Nurnberger, Krysha L. MacDonald, Robert V. Considine, Wei Wu, Adam T. Hirsh, Christopher A. Crawford, Michelle K. Williams, Timothy C. Lipuma, Samir K. Gupta, Richard J. Kovacs, Bruce L. Rollman, Jesse C. Stewart","doi":"10.1017/s0033291724001429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Depression is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), but it is unknown if successful depression treatment reduces CVD risk. Methods Using eIMPACT trial data, we examined the effect of modernized collaborative care for depression on indicators of CVD risk. A total of 216 primary care patients with depression and elevated CVD risk were randomized to 12 months of the eIMPACT intervention (internet cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT], telephonic CBT, and select antidepressant medications) or usual primary care. CVD-relevant health behaviors (self-reported CVD prevention medication adherence, sedentary behavior, and sleep quality) and traditional CVD risk factors (blood pressure and lipid fractions) were assessed over 12 months. Incident CVD events were tracked over four years using a statewide health information exchange. Results The intervention group exhibited greater improvement in depressive symptoms (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.01) and sleep quality (<jats:italic>p &lt;</jats:italic> 0.01) than the usual care group, but there was no intervention effect on systolic blood pressure (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.36), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.38), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.79), triglycerides (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.76), CVD prevention medication adherence (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.64), or sedentary behavior (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.57). There was an intervention effect on diastolic blood pressure that favored the usual care group (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.02). The likelihood of an incident CVD event did not differ between the intervention (13/107, 12.1%) and usual care (9/109, 8.3%) groups (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.39). Conclusions Successful depression treatment alone is not sufficient to lower the heightened CVD risk of people with depression. Alternative approaches are needed. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02458690","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of depression treatment on health behaviors and cardiovascular risk factors in primary care patients with depression and elevated cardiovascular risk: data from the eIMPACT trial\",\"authors\":\"Matthew D. Schuiling, Aubrey L. Shell, Christopher M. Callahan, John I. Nurnberger, Krysha L. MacDonald, Robert V. Considine, Wei Wu, Adam T. Hirsh, Christopher A. Crawford, Michelle K. Williams, Timothy C. Lipuma, Samir K. Gupta, Richard J. Kovacs, Bruce L. Rollman, Jesse C. Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0033291724001429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Depression is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), but it is unknown if successful depression treatment reduces CVD risk. Methods Using eIMPACT trial data, we examined the effect of modernized collaborative care for depression on indicators of CVD risk. A total of 216 primary care patients with depression and elevated CVD risk were randomized to 12 months of the eIMPACT intervention (internet cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT], telephonic CBT, and select antidepressant medications) or usual primary care. CVD-relevant health behaviors (self-reported CVD prevention medication adherence, sedentary behavior, and sleep quality) and traditional CVD risk factors (blood pressure and lipid fractions) were assessed over 12 months. Incident CVD events were tracked over four years using a statewide health information exchange. Results The intervention group exhibited greater improvement in depressive symptoms (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.01) and sleep quality (<jats:italic>p &lt;</jats:italic> 0.01) than the usual care group, but there was no intervention effect on systolic blood pressure (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.36), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.38), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.79), triglycerides (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.76), CVD prevention medication adherence (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.64), or sedentary behavior (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.57). There was an intervention effect on diastolic blood pressure that favored the usual care group (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.02). The likelihood of an incident CVD event did not differ between the intervention (13/107, 12.1%) and usual care (9/109, 8.3%) groups (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.39). Conclusions Successful depression treatment alone is not sufficient to lower the heightened CVD risk of people with depression. Alternative approaches are needed. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02458690\",\"PeriodicalId\":20891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291724001429\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291724001429","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 抑郁症是心血管疾病(CVD)的独立危险因素,但成功的抑郁症治疗是否能降低心血管疾病的风险尚不清楚。方法 我们利用 eIMPACT 试验数据,研究了抑郁症现代化协作治疗对心血管疾病风险指标的影响。共有 216 名患有抑郁症且心血管疾病风险升高的初级保健患者被随机分配到为期 12 个月的 eIMPACT 干预(互联网认知行为疗法 [CBT]、电话 CBT 和精选抗抑郁药物)或常规初级保健中。在 12 个月内对心血管疾病相关的健康行为(自我报告的心血管疾病预防用药依从性、久坐行为和睡眠质量)和传统的心血管疾病风险因素(血压和血脂)进行评估。利用全州范围内的健康信息交换系统对四年内发生的心血管疾病事件进行追踪。结果 与常规护理组相比,干预组在抑郁症状(p < 0.01)和睡眠质量(p < 0.01)方面有更大改善,但对收缩压(p = 0.36)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(p = 0.38)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(p = 0.79)、甘油三酯(p = 0.76)、心血管疾病预防用药依从性(p = 0.64)或久坐行为(p = 0.57)。对舒张压的干预效果有利于常规护理组(p = 0.02)。干预组(13/107,12.1%)和常规护理组(9/109,8.3%)发生心血管疾病事件的可能性没有差异(p = 0.39)。结论 仅靠成功的抑郁症治疗不足以降低抑郁症患者增加的心血管疾病风险。需要采取其他方法。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02458690
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of depression treatment on health behaviors and cardiovascular risk factors in primary care patients with depression and elevated cardiovascular risk: data from the eIMPACT trial
Background Depression is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), but it is unknown if successful depression treatment reduces CVD risk. Methods Using eIMPACT trial data, we examined the effect of modernized collaborative care for depression on indicators of CVD risk. A total of 216 primary care patients with depression and elevated CVD risk were randomized to 12 months of the eIMPACT intervention (internet cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT], telephonic CBT, and select antidepressant medications) or usual primary care. CVD-relevant health behaviors (self-reported CVD prevention medication adherence, sedentary behavior, and sleep quality) and traditional CVD risk factors (blood pressure and lipid fractions) were assessed over 12 months. Incident CVD events were tracked over four years using a statewide health information exchange. Results The intervention group exhibited greater improvement in depressive symptoms (p < 0.01) and sleep quality (p < 0.01) than the usual care group, but there was no intervention effect on systolic blood pressure (p = 0.36), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p = 0.38), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p = 0.79), triglycerides (p = 0.76), CVD prevention medication adherence (p = 0.64), or sedentary behavior (p = 0.57). There was an intervention effect on diastolic blood pressure that favored the usual care group (p = 0.02). The likelihood of an incident CVD event did not differ between the intervention (13/107, 12.1%) and usual care (9/109, 8.3%) groups (p = 0.39). Conclusions Successful depression treatment alone is not sufficient to lower the heightened CVD risk of people with depression. Alternative approaches are needed. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02458690
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信