{"title":"治疗帕金森病的多巴胺受体激动剂:演出必须继续","authors":"Wolfgang H. Jost","doi":"10.1007/s00702-024-02825-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dopamine agonists (DA) have proven very successful in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease for a good many years now. In the 1990’s they experienced a high level of acceptance particularly in the European countries because their efficacy was in fact established, their tolerability was improved on and, in addition, several preparations were available with longer effect durations. But the discovery of cardiac fibroses led to a substantial setback and even rejection of therapy using ergoline DA. In recent years, impulse control disturbances have been observed increasingly with the result that higher doses have been reduced and the previously popular use of non-ergoline DA was discontinued. In addition, newer data on levodopa were published which clearly relativized the occurrence of late complications under levodopa and led to a differentiated use. Thus the importance of their use has waned over the years. But we should rather avoid repeating the mistakes of the past. DA serve us well and reliably so. The pendulum apparently thrives of the extremes but in the case of DA we should keep from falling back into the other extreme: We can and in fact must further make use of the DA, but with a clear view of specific goals and in a differentiated way. DA constitute the second-most important substance class after levodopa. Their optimized application can only be recommended for the good of our patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dopamine agonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: the show must go on\",\"authors\":\"Wolfgang H. Jost\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00702-024-02825-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Dopamine agonists (DA) have proven very successful in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease for a good many years now. In the 1990’s they experienced a high level of acceptance particularly in the European countries because their efficacy was in fact established, their tolerability was improved on and, in addition, several preparations were available with longer effect durations. But the discovery of cardiac fibroses led to a substantial setback and even rejection of therapy using ergoline DA. In recent years, impulse control disturbances have been observed increasingly with the result that higher doses have been reduced and the previously popular use of non-ergoline DA was discontinued. In addition, newer data on levodopa were published which clearly relativized the occurrence of late complications under levodopa and led to a differentiated use. Thus the importance of their use has waned over the years. But we should rather avoid repeating the mistakes of the past. DA serve us well and reliably so. The pendulum apparently thrives of the extremes but in the case of DA we should keep from falling back into the other extreme: We can and in fact must further make use of the DA, but with a clear view of specific goals and in a differentiated way. DA constitute the second-most important substance class after levodopa. Their optimized application can only be recommended for the good of our patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-024-02825-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-024-02825-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
多年来,多巴胺受体激动剂(DA)在治疗帕金森病方面取得了巨大成功。20 世纪 90 年代,多巴胺受体激动剂尤其在欧洲国家获得了很高的认可度,因为它们的疗效得到了证实,耐受性也得到了改善,此外,还有几种药效持续时间更长的制剂可供使用。但是,心脏纤维症的发现导致了麦角林 DA 治疗的重大挫折,甚至遭到拒绝。近年来,越来越多的人观察到冲动控制障碍,因此减少了高剂量的使用,并停止了之前流行的非麦角碱 DA 的使用。此外,有关左旋多巴的最新数据也已公布,这些数据明确了左旋多巴后期并发症的发生率,并导致了对左旋多巴的区别使用。因此,这些年来,使用这些药物的重要性已经减弱。但我们应该避免重蹈覆辙。DA 为我们提供了可靠的服务。钟摆显然在两个极端之间徘徊,但对于 DA 来说,我们应该避免回到另一个极端:我们可以,事实上也必须进一步使用 DA,但要有明确的目标,并且要区别对待。DA是仅次于左旋多巴的第二重要物质类别。为了患者的利益,我们建议对其进行优化应用。
Dopamine agonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: the show must go on
Dopamine agonists (DA) have proven very successful in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease for a good many years now. In the 1990’s they experienced a high level of acceptance particularly in the European countries because their efficacy was in fact established, their tolerability was improved on and, in addition, several preparations were available with longer effect durations. But the discovery of cardiac fibroses led to a substantial setback and even rejection of therapy using ergoline DA. In recent years, impulse control disturbances have been observed increasingly with the result that higher doses have been reduced and the previously popular use of non-ergoline DA was discontinued. In addition, newer data on levodopa were published which clearly relativized the occurrence of late complications under levodopa and led to a differentiated use. Thus the importance of their use has waned over the years. But we should rather avoid repeating the mistakes of the past. DA serve us well and reliably so. The pendulum apparently thrives of the extremes but in the case of DA we should keep from falling back into the other extreme: We can and in fact must further make use of the DA, but with a clear view of specific goals and in a differentiated way. DA constitute the second-most important substance class after levodopa. Their optimized application can only be recommended for the good of our patients.