同事关系中的自我验证和社会主导地位

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Pegah Sajadi, Christian Vandenberghe, Ariane Ollier‐Malaterre
{"title":"同事关系中的自我验证和社会主导地位","authors":"Pegah Sajadi, Christian Vandenberghe, Ariane Ollier‐Malaterre","doi":"10.1111/emre.12671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article conceptualizes the bright and dark sides of self‐verification processes among dyads of coworkers from different social groups. We argue that these processes depend on coworkers' social dominance orientation (SDO), which determines whether they hold dominant, subordinate, or egalitarian social identities. The proposed typology identifies four types of dyads. In <jats:italic>stormy</jats:italic> dyads, the member of the dominant social group has a high SDO, the member of the subordinate social group has a low SDO, and self‐verification is associated with reciprocal covert (and occasionally overt) coworker antagonism. In <jats:italic>conforming</jats:italic> dyads, both members have high SDO, and self‐verification leads to covert antagonistic behaviors from the dominant member. In <jats:italic>egalitarian</jats:italic> dyads, both members have low SDO, and self‐verification leads to long‐term affective and instrumental coworker support. Finally, in <jats:italic>compassionate</jats:italic> dyads, the member of the dominant social group has a low SDO, the member of the subordinate social group has a high SDO, and coworker support is instrumental. We examine the implications of this typology for our understanding of self‐verification processes in the context of diversity among coworker relationships.","PeriodicalId":47372,"journal":{"name":"European Management Review","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self‐verification and social dominance in coworker dyads\",\"authors\":\"Pegah Sajadi, Christian Vandenberghe, Ariane Ollier‐Malaterre\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emre.12671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article conceptualizes the bright and dark sides of self‐verification processes among dyads of coworkers from different social groups. We argue that these processes depend on coworkers' social dominance orientation (SDO), which determines whether they hold dominant, subordinate, or egalitarian social identities. The proposed typology identifies four types of dyads. In <jats:italic>stormy</jats:italic> dyads, the member of the dominant social group has a high SDO, the member of the subordinate social group has a low SDO, and self‐verification is associated with reciprocal covert (and occasionally overt) coworker antagonism. In <jats:italic>conforming</jats:italic> dyads, both members have high SDO, and self‐verification leads to covert antagonistic behaviors from the dominant member. In <jats:italic>egalitarian</jats:italic> dyads, both members have low SDO, and self‐verification leads to long‐term affective and instrumental coworker support. Finally, in <jats:italic>compassionate</jats:italic> dyads, the member of the dominant social group has a low SDO, the member of the subordinate social group has a high SDO, and coworker support is instrumental. We examine the implications of this typology for our understanding of self‐verification processes in the context of diversity among coworker relationships.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Management Review\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12671\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12671","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对来自不同社会群体的同事之间的自我验证过程的光明面和阴暗面进行了概念化。我们认为,这些过程取决于同事的社会优势取向(SDO),SDO 决定了他们是持有支配性、从属性还是平等性的社会身份。所提出的类型学确定了四种类型的二人组。在暴风雨型二人组中,支配型社会群体的成员具有较高的社会支配取向,从属型社会群体的成员具有较低的社会支配取向,自我验证与同事之间相互的隐蔽(偶尔是公开)对抗有关。在顺从型二元组合中,两个成员都具有较高的 SDO,自我验证会导致支配型成员的隐蔽对抗行为。在平等主义领导班子中,双方的 SDO 都较低,自我验证会导致同事之间长期的情感和工具性支持。最后,在同情型二元组合中,处于支配地位的社会群体成员的 SDO 值较低,处于从属地位的社会群体成员的 SDO 值较高,同事间的支持是工具性的。我们将研究这一类型对我们理解同事关系多样性背景下自我验证过程的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self‐verification and social dominance in coworker dyads
This article conceptualizes the bright and dark sides of self‐verification processes among dyads of coworkers from different social groups. We argue that these processes depend on coworkers' social dominance orientation (SDO), which determines whether they hold dominant, subordinate, or egalitarian social identities. The proposed typology identifies four types of dyads. In stormy dyads, the member of the dominant social group has a high SDO, the member of the subordinate social group has a low SDO, and self‐verification is associated with reciprocal covert (and occasionally overt) coworker antagonism. In conforming dyads, both members have high SDO, and self‐verification leads to covert antagonistic behaviors from the dominant member. In egalitarian dyads, both members have low SDO, and self‐verification leads to long‐term affective and instrumental coworker support. Finally, in compassionate dyads, the member of the dominant social group has a low SDO, the member of the subordinate social group has a high SDO, and coworker support is instrumental. We examine the implications of this typology for our understanding of self‐verification processes in the context of diversity among coworker relationships.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The European Management Review is an international journal dedicated to advancing the understanding of management in private and public sector organizations through empirical investigation and theoretical analysis. The European Management Review provides an international forum for dialogue between researchers, thereby improving the understanding of the nature of management in different settings and promoting the transfer of research results to management practice. Although one of the European Management Review"s aims is to foster the general advancement of management scholarship among European scholars and/or those academics interested in European management issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信