用于癌症患儿的粗大运动功能测量的内部一致性和地板/天花板效应:横断面研究

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Francesca Rossi, Monica Valle, Giovanni Galeoto, Marco Tofani, Paola Berchialla, Veronica Sciannameo, Daniele Bertin, Annalisa Calcagno, Roberto Casalaz, Margherita Cerboneschi, Marta Cervo, Annalisa Cornelli, Chiara Di Pede, Maria Esposito, Miriana Ferrarese, Paola Imazio, Maria Lorenzon, Lucia Longo, Andrea Martinuzzi, Gabriella Naretto, Nicoletta Orsini, Daniele Panzeri, Chiara Pellegrini, Michela Peranzoni, Fabiola Picone, Marco Rabusin, Federica Ricci, Claudia Zigrino, Giulia Zucchetti, Franca Fagioli
{"title":"用于癌症患儿的粗大运动功能测量的内部一致性和地板/天花板效应:横断面研究","authors":"Francesca Rossi, Monica Valle, Giovanni Galeoto, Marco Tofani, Paola Berchialla, Veronica Sciannameo, Daniele Bertin, Annalisa Calcagno, Roberto Casalaz, Margherita Cerboneschi, Marta Cervo, Annalisa Cornelli, Chiara Di Pede, Maria Esposito, Miriana Ferrarese, Paola Imazio, Maria Lorenzon, Lucia Longo, Andrea Martinuzzi, Gabriella Naretto, Nicoletta Orsini, Daniele Panzeri, Chiara Pellegrini, Michela Peranzoni, Fabiola Picone, Marco Rabusin, Federica Ricci, Claudia Zigrino, Giulia Zucchetti, Franca Fagioli","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31090390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children/adolescents with cancer can develop adverse effects impacting gross motor function. There is a lack of gross motor function assessment tools that have been validated for this population. The aim of this multicenter cross-sectional study was to preliminary validate the 88-item Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) for use in children/adolescents with cancer, exploring internal consistency and floor/ceiling effect. Inclusion criteria regarded children/adolescents diagnosed with cancer on treatment or <1 year off therapy. The internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s α, and the floor–ceiling effects were calculated through percentage. This study involved 217 participants with heterogeneous neoplasm conditions. Internal consistency was good, with a Cronbach’s α of 0.989. Floor–ceiling effect analysis reveals that several items obtained a dichotomous scoring distribution in each of the five sub-scales of the GMFM-88. This can be explained by the heterogeneous clinical characteristics of the target population. The preliminary validation of GMFM-88 in a group of children/adolescents affected by cancer suggests that some items are not able to discriminate between different gross motor function levels, and therefore it does not represent an informative tool to measure gross motor function in children with cancer. Future research is needed to define which ones could be more useful for clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internal Consistency and Floor/Ceiling Effects of the Gross Motor Function Measure for Use with Children Affected by Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Rossi, Monica Valle, Giovanni Galeoto, Marco Tofani, Paola Berchialla, Veronica Sciannameo, Daniele Bertin, Annalisa Calcagno, Roberto Casalaz, Margherita Cerboneschi, Marta Cervo, Annalisa Cornelli, Chiara Di Pede, Maria Esposito, Miriana Ferrarese, Paola Imazio, Maria Lorenzon, Lucia Longo, Andrea Martinuzzi, Gabriella Naretto, Nicoletta Orsini, Daniele Panzeri, Chiara Pellegrini, Michela Peranzoni, Fabiola Picone, Marco Rabusin, Federica Ricci, Claudia Zigrino, Giulia Zucchetti, Franca Fagioli\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol31090390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Children/adolescents with cancer can develop adverse effects impacting gross motor function. There is a lack of gross motor function assessment tools that have been validated for this population. The aim of this multicenter cross-sectional study was to preliminary validate the 88-item Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) for use in children/adolescents with cancer, exploring internal consistency and floor/ceiling effect. Inclusion criteria regarded children/adolescents diagnosed with cancer on treatment or <1 year off therapy. The internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s α, and the floor–ceiling effects were calculated through percentage. This study involved 217 participants with heterogeneous neoplasm conditions. Internal consistency was good, with a Cronbach’s α of 0.989. Floor–ceiling effect analysis reveals that several items obtained a dichotomous scoring distribution in each of the five sub-scales of the GMFM-88. This can be explained by the heterogeneous clinical characteristics of the target population. The preliminary validation of GMFM-88 in a group of children/adolescents affected by cancer suggests that some items are not able to discriminate between different gross motor function levels, and therefore it does not represent an informative tool to measure gross motor function in children with cancer. Future research is needed to define which ones could be more useful for clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31090390\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31090390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童/青少年癌症患者可能会出现影响粗大运动功能的不良反应。目前还缺乏针对这一人群的经过验证的粗大运动功能评估工具。这项多中心横断面研究旨在初步验证 88 项粗大运动功能测量(GMFM-88)在癌症儿童/青少年中的应用,探索其内部一致性和上下限效应。纳入标准为正在接受治疗或治疗结束后不到一年的癌症儿童/青少年。内部一致性采用 Cronbach's α 进行评估,上下限效应通过百分比进行计算。这项研究涉及 217 名患有不同肿瘤的参与者。内部一致性良好,Cronbach's α 为 0.989。上下限效应分析表明,在 GMFM-88 的五个分量表中,有几个项目的得分分布是二分法。这可以用目标人群的异质性临床特征来解释。在一群受癌症影响的儿童/青少年中对 GMFM-88 进行的初步验证表明,有些项目无法区分不同的粗大运动功能水平,因此它并不是测量癌症儿童粗大运动功能的信息工具。未来的研究需要确定哪些项目对临床实践更有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Internal Consistency and Floor/Ceiling Effects of the Gross Motor Function Measure for Use with Children Affected by Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study
Children/adolescents with cancer can develop adverse effects impacting gross motor function. There is a lack of gross motor function assessment tools that have been validated for this population. The aim of this multicenter cross-sectional study was to preliminary validate the 88-item Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) for use in children/adolescents with cancer, exploring internal consistency and floor/ceiling effect. Inclusion criteria regarded children/adolescents diagnosed with cancer on treatment or <1 year off therapy. The internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s α, and the floor–ceiling effects were calculated through percentage. This study involved 217 participants with heterogeneous neoplasm conditions. Internal consistency was good, with a Cronbach’s α of 0.989. Floor–ceiling effect analysis reveals that several items obtained a dichotomous scoring distribution in each of the five sub-scales of the GMFM-88. This can be explained by the heterogeneous clinical characteristics of the target population. The preliminary validation of GMFM-88 in a group of children/adolescents affected by cancer suggests that some items are not able to discriminate between different gross motor function levels, and therefore it does not represent an informative tool to measure gross motor function in children with cancer. Future research is needed to define which ones could be more useful for clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信