对血栓切除术失败的中风患者进行静脉溶栓的效果。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Sameh Samir Elawady,Rahim Abo Kasem,Hidetoshi Matsukawa,Conor Cunningham,Mohamed Mahdi Sowlat,Noah Lee Nawabi,Atakan Orscelik,Joshua M Venegas,Julio Isidor,Hasna Loulida,Ilko Maier,Pascal Jabbour,Joon-Tae Kim,Stacey Quintero Wolfe,Ansaar Rai,Robert M Starke,Marios-Nikos Psychogios,Edgar A Samaniego,Nitin Goyal,Shinichi Yoshimura,Hugo Cuellar,Brian Howard,Ali Alawieh,Ali Alaraj,Mohamad Ezzeldin,Daniele G Romano,Omar Tanweer,Justin Mascitelli,Isabel Fragata,Adam Polifka,Fazeel Siddiqui,Joshua Osbun,Ramesh Grandhi,Roberto Crosa,Charles Matouk,Min S Park,Michael R Levitt,Waleed Brinjikji,Mark Moss,Ergun Daglioglu,Richard Williamson,Pedro Navia,Peter Kan,Reade De Leacy,Shakeel Chowdhry,David J Altschul,Alejandro M Spiotta,Sami Al Kasab
{"title":"对血栓切除术失败的中风患者进行静脉溶栓的效果。","authors":"Sameh Samir Elawady,Rahim Abo Kasem,Hidetoshi Matsukawa,Conor Cunningham,Mohamed Mahdi Sowlat,Noah Lee Nawabi,Atakan Orscelik,Joshua M Venegas,Julio Isidor,Hasna Loulida,Ilko Maier,Pascal Jabbour,Joon-Tae Kim,Stacey Quintero Wolfe,Ansaar Rai,Robert M Starke,Marios-Nikos Psychogios,Edgar A Samaniego,Nitin Goyal,Shinichi Yoshimura,Hugo Cuellar,Brian Howard,Ali Alawieh,Ali Alaraj,Mohamad Ezzeldin,Daniele G Romano,Omar Tanweer,Justin Mascitelli,Isabel Fragata,Adam Polifka,Fazeel Siddiqui,Joshua Osbun,Ramesh Grandhi,Roberto Crosa,Charles Matouk,Min S Park,Michael R Levitt,Waleed Brinjikji,Mark Moss,Ergun Daglioglu,Richard Williamson,Pedro Navia,Peter Kan,Reade De Leacy,Shakeel Chowdhry,David J Altschul,Alejandro M Spiotta,Sami Al Kasab","doi":"10.1177/15910199241279009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is well established. We aim to study the benefits of IVT in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) who underwent unsuccessful mechanical thrombectomy (MT).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe included AIS patients who underwent MT for anterior circulation LVO with failed recanalization (modified treatment in cerebral ischemia [mTICI] score ≤ 2A). Patients who received IVT prior to MT were compared to those who received MT alone. Propensity score matching using demographic, clinical, radiographic and procedural variables was used to match patients with and without IVT. The primary outcome was favorable 90-day good functional outcome (defined as modified Rankin scale of 0-2), and secondary outcomes included intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH (sICH), and 90-day mortality.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nTotally, 610 AIS patients with unsuccessful MT were included. After propensity matching, 219 patients were identified in each group. Median age was 70 years and 73 years in the IVT + MT and MT alone groups, respectively. In the IVT + MT group, final mTICI scores of 0, 1, and 2A were achieved in 92 (42.0%), 33 (15.1%), and 94 (42.9%) patients, respectively, versus 76 (34.7%), 29 (13.2%), and 114 (52.1%) in the MT alone group. The IVT + MT group had greater odds of 90-day good functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio 2.54, 95% confidence interval 1.53-4.32). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIVT is associated with improved functional outcomes in AIS patients with LVO despite unsuccessful MT.","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":"34 1","pages":"15910199241279009"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients with unsuccessful thrombectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Sameh Samir Elawady,Rahim Abo Kasem,Hidetoshi Matsukawa,Conor Cunningham,Mohamed Mahdi Sowlat,Noah Lee Nawabi,Atakan Orscelik,Joshua M Venegas,Julio Isidor,Hasna Loulida,Ilko Maier,Pascal Jabbour,Joon-Tae Kim,Stacey Quintero Wolfe,Ansaar Rai,Robert M Starke,Marios-Nikos Psychogios,Edgar A Samaniego,Nitin Goyal,Shinichi Yoshimura,Hugo Cuellar,Brian Howard,Ali Alawieh,Ali Alaraj,Mohamad Ezzeldin,Daniele G Romano,Omar Tanweer,Justin Mascitelli,Isabel Fragata,Adam Polifka,Fazeel Siddiqui,Joshua Osbun,Ramesh Grandhi,Roberto Crosa,Charles Matouk,Min S Park,Michael R Levitt,Waleed Brinjikji,Mark Moss,Ergun Daglioglu,Richard Williamson,Pedro Navia,Peter Kan,Reade De Leacy,Shakeel Chowdhry,David J Altschul,Alejandro M Spiotta,Sami Al Kasab\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199241279009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nThe benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is well established. We aim to study the benefits of IVT in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) who underwent unsuccessful mechanical thrombectomy (MT).\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe included AIS patients who underwent MT for anterior circulation LVO with failed recanalization (modified treatment in cerebral ischemia [mTICI] score ≤ 2A). Patients who received IVT prior to MT were compared to those who received MT alone. Propensity score matching using demographic, clinical, radiographic and procedural variables was used to match patients with and without IVT. The primary outcome was favorable 90-day good functional outcome (defined as modified Rankin scale of 0-2), and secondary outcomes included intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH (sICH), and 90-day mortality.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nTotally, 610 AIS patients with unsuccessful MT were included. After propensity matching, 219 patients were identified in each group. Median age was 70 years and 73 years in the IVT + MT and MT alone groups, respectively. In the IVT + MT group, final mTICI scores of 0, 1, and 2A were achieved in 92 (42.0%), 33 (15.1%), and 94 (42.9%) patients, respectively, versus 76 (34.7%), 29 (13.2%), and 114 (52.1%) in the MT alone group. The IVT + MT group had greater odds of 90-day good functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio 2.54, 95% confidence interval 1.53-4.32). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nIVT is associated with improved functional outcomes in AIS patients with LVO despite unsuccessful MT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"15910199241279009\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241279009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241279009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景静脉溶栓(IVT)的益处已得到公认。我们的目的是研究 IVT 对急性缺血性卒中(AIS)大血管闭塞(LVO)且接受机械取栓术(MT)未成功的患者的益处。在 MT 之前接受 IVT 的患者与仅接受 MT 的患者进行了比较。使用人口统计学、临床、影像学和手术变量进行倾向评分匹配,以匹配接受 IVT 和未接受 IVT 的患者。主要结局是 90 天良好功能结局(定义为修改后的 Rankin 评分 0-2),次要结局包括颅内出血(ICH)、症状性 ICH(sICH)和 90 天死亡率。经过倾向匹配后,每组确定了 219 名患者。IVT + MT组和单纯MT组的中位年龄分别为70岁和73岁。在 IVT + MT 组中,最终 mTICI 得分为 0、1 和 2A 的患者分别有 92 人(42.0%)、33 人(15.1%)和 94 人(42.9%),而单纯 MT 组分别有 76 人(34.7%)、29 人(13.2%)和 114 人(52.1%)。IVT+MT组患者90天功能良好的几率更大(调整后的几率比2.54,95%置信区间1.53-4.32)。结论 尽管 MT 不成功,IVT 仍能改善 LVO AIS 患者的功能预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke patients with unsuccessful thrombectomy.
BACKGROUND The benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is well established. We aim to study the benefits of IVT in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) who underwent unsuccessful mechanical thrombectomy (MT). METHODS We included AIS patients who underwent MT for anterior circulation LVO with failed recanalization (modified treatment in cerebral ischemia [mTICI] score ≤ 2A). Patients who received IVT prior to MT were compared to those who received MT alone. Propensity score matching using demographic, clinical, radiographic and procedural variables was used to match patients with and without IVT. The primary outcome was favorable 90-day good functional outcome (defined as modified Rankin scale of 0-2), and secondary outcomes included intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH (sICH), and 90-day mortality. RESULTS Totally, 610 AIS patients with unsuccessful MT were included. After propensity matching, 219 patients were identified in each group. Median age was 70 years and 73 years in the IVT + MT and MT alone groups, respectively. In the IVT + MT group, final mTICI scores of 0, 1, and 2A were achieved in 92 (42.0%), 33 (15.1%), and 94 (42.9%) patients, respectively, versus 76 (34.7%), 29 (13.2%), and 114 (52.1%) in the MT alone group. The IVT + MT group had greater odds of 90-day good functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio 2.54, 95% confidence interval 1.53-4.32). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS IVT is associated with improved functional outcomes in AIS patients with LVO despite unsuccessful MT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信