将目标土壤测试值和作物除磷作为玉米磷肥施用策略的长期比较

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Swetabh Patel, Charles Shapiro, Javed Iqbal
{"title":"将目标土壤测试值和作物除磷作为玉米磷肥施用策略的长期比较","authors":"Swetabh Patel,&nbsp;Charles Shapiro,&nbsp;Javed Iqbal","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Finding effective phosphorus (P) recommendation strategies to optimize corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) yield under varying yield levels and environmental conditions is continuously sought after. A 16-year study was conducted in Concord, NE, on Nora silt loam soil initially measuring 16 ± 3 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> Bray-1 P. The study evaluated the impact of different P fertilization strategies on corn yield across various growing conditions (dry, normal, and wet years). Treatments included no P or N (NPNN), no P (NP), P applied at crop removal phosphorus (CRP), and maintaining soil P at 15 (B15), 30 (B30), and 45 (B45) mg kg<sup>−1</sup> Bray-1 P, with similar nitrogen (N) rates except for NPNN. Results showed a 25% and 33% reduction in soil test phosphorus (STP) for NPNN and NP treatments, respectively. The total P required by B30 and B45 treatments was 1.8 times more than that for CRP and B15. Although B30 and B45 treatments increased corn grain P concentration by 6%–12% compared to B15 and CRP, they did not increase yields in normal and dry years. The NP led to yield reductions of 9% and 12% in normal and wet years, respectively. In contrast, CRP achieved an 8% higher yield than B15 during wet years. Economic analysis revealed that B45 yielded a 56% higher net return in normal years, while CRP offered the highest return on investment (ROI) at 4.9. This study highlights the complexity of managing soil P under varying environmental conditions, emphasizing that while maintaining higher STP levels (B30 and B45) can enhance grain P concentration, it does not significantly boost yield and ROI compared to CRP and B15.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 6","pages":"3240-3255"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21677","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term comparison of targeted soil test values and crop removal as a phosphorus fertilization strategy in corn\",\"authors\":\"Swetabh Patel,&nbsp;Charles Shapiro,&nbsp;Javed Iqbal\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.21677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Finding effective phosphorus (P) recommendation strategies to optimize corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) yield under varying yield levels and environmental conditions is continuously sought after. A 16-year study was conducted in Concord, NE, on Nora silt loam soil initially measuring 16 ± 3 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> Bray-1 P. The study evaluated the impact of different P fertilization strategies on corn yield across various growing conditions (dry, normal, and wet years). Treatments included no P or N (NPNN), no P (NP), P applied at crop removal phosphorus (CRP), and maintaining soil P at 15 (B15), 30 (B30), and 45 (B45) mg kg<sup>−1</sup> Bray-1 P, with similar nitrogen (N) rates except for NPNN. Results showed a 25% and 33% reduction in soil test phosphorus (STP) for NPNN and NP treatments, respectively. The total P required by B30 and B45 treatments was 1.8 times more than that for CRP and B15. Although B30 and B45 treatments increased corn grain P concentration by 6%–12% compared to B15 and CRP, they did not increase yields in normal and dry years. The NP led to yield reductions of 9% and 12% in normal and wet years, respectively. In contrast, CRP achieved an 8% higher yield than B15 during wet years. Economic analysis revealed that B45 yielded a 56% higher net return in normal years, while CRP offered the highest return on investment (ROI) at 4.9. This study highlights the complexity of managing soil P under varying environmental conditions, emphasizing that while maintaining higher STP levels (B30 and B45) can enhance grain P concentration, it does not significantly boost yield and ROI compared to CRP and B15.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"116 6\",\"pages\":\"3240-3255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21677\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21677\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21677","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们一直在寻找有效的磷(P)推荐策略,以优化玉米(Zea mays L.)在不同产量水平和环境条件下的产量。该研究评估了不同磷肥施用策略在不同生长条件下(干旱、正常和潮湿年份)对玉米产量的影响。处理方法包括不施磷肥或氮肥(NPNN)、不施磷肥(NP)、按作物除磷量施磷(CRP),以及将土壤磷肥保持在 15 (B15)、30 (B30) 和 45 (B45) mg kg-1 Bray-1 P,除 NPNN 外,施氮量相似。结果表明,NPNN 和 NP 处理的土壤测试磷(STP)分别减少了 25% 和 33%。B30 和 B45 处理所需的总磷是 CRP 和 B15 处理的 1.8 倍。虽然 B30 和 B45 处理比 B15 和 CRP 增加了 6%-12% 的玉米籽粒 P 浓度,但它们在正常年份和干旱年份并没有提高产量。在正常年份和潮湿年份,氮磷钾分别导致减产 9% 和 12%。相比之下,在潮湿年份,CRP 的产量比 B15 高出 8%。经济分析表明,在正常年份,B45 的净收益率高出 56%,而 CRP 的投资回报率(ROI)最高,为 4.9。这项研究突出了在不同环境条件下管理土壤钾的复杂性,强调虽然保持较高的 STP 水平(B30 和 B45)可以提高谷物钾浓度,但与 CRP 和 B15 相比,并不能显著提高产量和投资回报率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Long-term comparison of targeted soil test values and crop removal as a phosphorus fertilization strategy in corn

Long-term comparison of targeted soil test values and crop removal as a phosphorus fertilization strategy in corn

Finding effective phosphorus (P) recommendation strategies to optimize corn (Zea mays L.) yield under varying yield levels and environmental conditions is continuously sought after. A 16-year study was conducted in Concord, NE, on Nora silt loam soil initially measuring 16 ± 3 mg kg−1 Bray-1 P. The study evaluated the impact of different P fertilization strategies on corn yield across various growing conditions (dry, normal, and wet years). Treatments included no P or N (NPNN), no P (NP), P applied at crop removal phosphorus (CRP), and maintaining soil P at 15 (B15), 30 (B30), and 45 (B45) mg kg−1 Bray-1 P, with similar nitrogen (N) rates except for NPNN. Results showed a 25% and 33% reduction in soil test phosphorus (STP) for NPNN and NP treatments, respectively. The total P required by B30 and B45 treatments was 1.8 times more than that for CRP and B15. Although B30 and B45 treatments increased corn grain P concentration by 6%–12% compared to B15 and CRP, they did not increase yields in normal and dry years. The NP led to yield reductions of 9% and 12% in normal and wet years, respectively. In contrast, CRP achieved an 8% higher yield than B15 during wet years. Economic analysis revealed that B45 yielded a 56% higher net return in normal years, while CRP offered the highest return on investment (ROI) at 4.9. This study highlights the complexity of managing soil P under varying environmental conditions, emphasizing that while maintaining higher STP levels (B30 and B45) can enhance grain P concentration, it does not significantly boost yield and ROI compared to CRP and B15.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信