地中海条件下免耕旱地的谷物轮作替代方案

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Gonçalo Nascimento, Dolors Villegas, Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes, Carlos Cantero-Martínez
{"title":"地中海条件下免耕旱地的谷物轮作替代方案","authors":"Gonçalo Nascimento,&nbsp;Dolors Villegas,&nbsp;Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes,&nbsp;Carlos Cantero-Martínez","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cereal crops are frequently rotated with broadleaf crops to achieve the benefits associated with crop diversification. However, broadleaf crops often fail in Mediterranean drylands due to their lower adaptation to drought. Alternative cereal crops such as triticale (<i>×Triticosecale</i> Wittmack) and oat (<i>Avena sativa</i> L.) can help diversify drylands in the Ebro valley, dominated by barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.) and wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) cultivation. A 6-year field experiment was conducted with five crop sequences under no-tillage: triticale–wheat–barley (TWB), oat–wheat–barley (OWB), fallow–wheat–barley, monocrop wheat, and monocrop barley. Wheat and barley grain yield, N use efficiency, and water use efficiency responses were evaluated, and economic analyses of the whole sequences were performed. Oat increased subsequent wheat yields by 15% and barley yields by 12% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) compared to monocropping. Similar water and N availability at sowing suggest additional synergies in an OWB rotation (possibly pest reduction), contributing to the yield increase of both crops. However, this rotation was less profitable than a TWB rotation (<i>p</i> = 0.002) due to the limited adaptation of oat to Mediterranean settings. Long fallowing lacked consistent benefits in water and N availability for subsequent crops. This practice protects farmers from economic losses in low-yielding seasons, but there is an associated opportunity cost in favorable years. The introduction of alternative cereal crops has demonstrated benefits for wheat and barley production, although greater understanding of the synergistic mechanisms involved is essential to ascertain whether resource efficiency is maintained beyond the studied timeframe.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 6","pages":"3117-3129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21683","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative cereal crop rotations in a no-tillage dryland under Mediterranean conditions\",\"authors\":\"Gonçalo Nascimento,&nbsp;Dolors Villegas,&nbsp;Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes,&nbsp;Carlos Cantero-Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.21683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cereal crops are frequently rotated with broadleaf crops to achieve the benefits associated with crop diversification. However, broadleaf crops often fail in Mediterranean drylands due to their lower adaptation to drought. Alternative cereal crops such as triticale (<i>×Triticosecale</i> Wittmack) and oat (<i>Avena sativa</i> L.) can help diversify drylands in the Ebro valley, dominated by barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.) and wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) cultivation. A 6-year field experiment was conducted with five crop sequences under no-tillage: triticale–wheat–barley (TWB), oat–wheat–barley (OWB), fallow–wheat–barley, monocrop wheat, and monocrop barley. Wheat and barley grain yield, N use efficiency, and water use efficiency responses were evaluated, and economic analyses of the whole sequences were performed. Oat increased subsequent wheat yields by 15% and barley yields by 12% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) compared to monocropping. Similar water and N availability at sowing suggest additional synergies in an OWB rotation (possibly pest reduction), contributing to the yield increase of both crops. However, this rotation was less profitable than a TWB rotation (<i>p</i> = 0.002) due to the limited adaptation of oat to Mediterranean settings. Long fallowing lacked consistent benefits in water and N availability for subsequent crops. This practice protects farmers from economic losses in low-yielding seasons, but there is an associated opportunity cost in favorable years. The introduction of alternative cereal crops has demonstrated benefits for wheat and barley production, although greater understanding of the synergistic mechanisms involved is essential to ascertain whether resource efficiency is maintained beyond the studied timeframe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"116 6\",\"pages\":\"3117-3129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21683\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21683\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21683","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

谷类作物经常与阔叶作物轮作,以获得作物多样化带来的好处。然而,由于阔叶作物对干旱的适应能力较低,它们在地中海旱地往往歉收。在以种植大麦(Hordeum vulgare L.)和小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)为主的埃布罗河谷,三棱麦(×Triticosecale Wittmack)和燕麦(Avena sativa L.)等替代谷类作物有助于实现旱地多样化。在为期 6 年的田间试验中,采用了五种免耕作物序列:三季稻-小麦-大麦(TWB)、燕麦-小麦-大麦(OWB)、休耕-小麦-大麦、单作小麦和单作大麦。对小麦和大麦的谷物产量、氮利用效率和水利用效率进行了评估,并对整个序列进行了经济分析。与单作相比,燕麦使小麦产量提高了 15%,大麦产量提高了 12%(p < 0.001)。播种时相似的水分和氮的可用性表明,燕麦和大麦轮作还能产生额外的协同作用(可能是减少虫害),从而促进两种作物的增产。然而,由于燕麦对地中海环境的适应性有限,这种轮作方式的收益低于 TWB 轮作方式(p = 0.002)。长期休耕在为后茬作物提供水和氮方面缺乏持续的效益。这种做法可保护农民在低产季节免受经济损失,但在丰产年份也会产生相关的机会成本。引进替代谷物作物已证明对小麦和大麦生产有利,但要确定资源效率是否能在研究时间框架后保持不变,就必须进一步了解其中的协同机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Alternative cereal crop rotations in a no-tillage dryland under Mediterranean conditions

Alternative cereal crop rotations in a no-tillage dryland under Mediterranean conditions

Cereal crops are frequently rotated with broadleaf crops to achieve the benefits associated with crop diversification. However, broadleaf crops often fail in Mediterranean drylands due to their lower adaptation to drought. Alternative cereal crops such as triticale (×Triticosecale Wittmack) and oat (Avena sativa L.) can help diversify drylands in the Ebro valley, dominated by barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivation. A 6-year field experiment was conducted with five crop sequences under no-tillage: triticale–wheat–barley (TWB), oat–wheat–barley (OWB), fallow–wheat–barley, monocrop wheat, and monocrop barley. Wheat and barley grain yield, N use efficiency, and water use efficiency responses were evaluated, and economic analyses of the whole sequences were performed. Oat increased subsequent wheat yields by 15% and barley yields by 12% (p < 0.001) compared to monocropping. Similar water and N availability at sowing suggest additional synergies in an OWB rotation (possibly pest reduction), contributing to the yield increase of both crops. However, this rotation was less profitable than a TWB rotation (p = 0.002) due to the limited adaptation of oat to Mediterranean settings. Long fallowing lacked consistent benefits in water and N availability for subsequent crops. This practice protects farmers from economic losses in low-yielding seasons, but there is an associated opportunity cost in favorable years. The introduction of alternative cereal crops has demonstrated benefits for wheat and barley production, although greater understanding of the synergistic mechanisms involved is essential to ascertain whether resource efficiency is maintained beyond the studied timeframe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信