三维打印临时冠的即刻和长期拔出粘接强度。

IF 2.6 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Joyce R C Dos S Siqueira,Rita M M Rodriguez,Nathalia de C Ramos,Marco A Bottino,João P M Tribst
{"title":"三维打印临时冠的即刻和长期拔出粘接强度。","authors":"Joyce R C Dos S Siqueira,Rita M M Rodriguez,Nathalia de C Ramos,Marco A Bottino,João P M Tribst","doi":"10.1155/2024/7205011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Over the past decade, 3D printing technology has revolutionized various fields, including dentistry. Provisional restorations play a crucial role in prosthetic rehabilitation, necessitating the evaluation of their bond strength with different provisional cement agents. Aims: This study is aimed at assessing the immediate and long-term bond strength of 3D-printed dental crowns using three provisional cement agents. Materials and Methods: Provisional crowns (N = 36) were manufactured using 3D modeling software and cemented in dentin analogues (G10 Nema resin). After the crowns' fabrication, they were randomly divided into three groups (n = 12) for cementation with Relyx Temp 3M ESPE, Provicol-VOCO, and Meron-VOCO. Tensile strength tests were conducted using a universal testing machine, with half of the specimens subjected to 2000 thermal cycles before testing. Finite element analysis was employed to assess tensile stress distribution. Results: Statistical analysis (two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at a 95% confidence level) revealed significant effects of cement type (p = 0.006) and thermal aging (p = 0.001) on bond strength. Glass ionomer cement exhibited the highest immediate resistance, while all types of cement were adversely affected by thermal aging, resulting in decreased bond strength. Conclusion: Thermal aging significantly alters the properties of 3D printing resin and affects the bond strength of provisional cement with 3D-printed crowns. Despite the adverse effects of thermal aging, glass ionomer cement demonstrated the highest immediate resistance. Clinicians should carefully consider these findings when selecting provisional cements for 3D-printed crowns.","PeriodicalId":9007,"journal":{"name":"BioMed Research International","volume":"23 1","pages":"7205011"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immediate and Long-Term Pull-Out Bond Strength of 3D-Printed Provisional Crowns.\",\"authors\":\"Joyce R C Dos S Siqueira,Rita M M Rodriguez,Nathalia de C Ramos,Marco A Bottino,João P M Tribst\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/7205011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Over the past decade, 3D printing technology has revolutionized various fields, including dentistry. Provisional restorations play a crucial role in prosthetic rehabilitation, necessitating the evaluation of their bond strength with different provisional cement agents. Aims: This study is aimed at assessing the immediate and long-term bond strength of 3D-printed dental crowns using three provisional cement agents. Materials and Methods: Provisional crowns (N = 36) were manufactured using 3D modeling software and cemented in dentin analogues (G10 Nema resin). After the crowns' fabrication, they were randomly divided into three groups (n = 12) for cementation with Relyx Temp 3M ESPE, Provicol-VOCO, and Meron-VOCO. Tensile strength tests were conducted using a universal testing machine, with half of the specimens subjected to 2000 thermal cycles before testing. Finite element analysis was employed to assess tensile stress distribution. Results: Statistical analysis (two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at a 95% confidence level) revealed significant effects of cement type (p = 0.006) and thermal aging (p = 0.001) on bond strength. Glass ionomer cement exhibited the highest immediate resistance, while all types of cement were adversely affected by thermal aging, resulting in decreased bond strength. Conclusion: Thermal aging significantly alters the properties of 3D printing resin and affects the bond strength of provisional cement with 3D-printed crowns. Despite the adverse effects of thermal aging, glass ionomer cement demonstrated the highest immediate resistance. Clinicians should carefully consider these findings when selecting provisional cements for 3D-printed crowns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioMed Research International\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"7205011\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioMed Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7205011\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMed Research International","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7205011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在过去的十年中,3D 打印技术给包括牙科在内的各个领域带来了革命性的变化。临时修复体在修复过程中起着至关重要的作用,因此有必要对其与不同临时粘接剂的粘接强度进行评估。目的:本研究旨在评估使用三种临时粘接剂的 3D 打印牙冠的即刻和长期粘接强度。材料和方法:使用三维建模软件制作临时牙冠(N = 36),并与牙本质类似物(G10 Nema 树脂)粘接。牙冠制作完成后,随机分为三组(n = 12),分别使用 Relyx Temp 3M ESPE、Provicol-VOCO 和 Meron-VOCO进行粘接。使用万能试验机进行拉伸强度测试,其中一半试样在测试前进行了 2000 次热循环。采用有限元分析评估拉伸应力分布。结果统计分析(95% 置信度下的双向方差分析和 Tukey 检验)显示,水泥类型(p = 0.006)和热老化(p = 0.001)对粘接强度有显著影响。玻璃离子聚合物水门汀表现出最高的即刻耐受性,而所有类型的水门汀都受到热老化的不利影响,导致粘结强度下降。结论:热老化会明显改变 3D 打印树脂的特性,并影响临时粘接剂与 3D 打印牙冠的粘接强度。尽管热老化会产生不利影响,但玻璃离子聚合物水泥的即刻耐受性最高。临床医生在为 3D 打印牙冠选择临时粘接剂时应仔细考虑这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immediate and Long-Term Pull-Out Bond Strength of 3D-Printed Provisional Crowns.
Background: Over the past decade, 3D printing technology has revolutionized various fields, including dentistry. Provisional restorations play a crucial role in prosthetic rehabilitation, necessitating the evaluation of their bond strength with different provisional cement agents. Aims: This study is aimed at assessing the immediate and long-term bond strength of 3D-printed dental crowns using three provisional cement agents. Materials and Methods: Provisional crowns (N = 36) were manufactured using 3D modeling software and cemented in dentin analogues (G10 Nema resin). After the crowns' fabrication, they were randomly divided into three groups (n = 12) for cementation with Relyx Temp 3M ESPE, Provicol-VOCO, and Meron-VOCO. Tensile strength tests were conducted using a universal testing machine, with half of the specimens subjected to 2000 thermal cycles before testing. Finite element analysis was employed to assess tensile stress distribution. Results: Statistical analysis (two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at a 95% confidence level) revealed significant effects of cement type (p = 0.006) and thermal aging (p = 0.001) on bond strength. Glass ionomer cement exhibited the highest immediate resistance, while all types of cement were adversely affected by thermal aging, resulting in decreased bond strength. Conclusion: Thermal aging significantly alters the properties of 3D printing resin and affects the bond strength of provisional cement with 3D-printed crowns. Despite the adverse effects of thermal aging, glass ionomer cement demonstrated the highest immediate resistance. Clinicians should carefully consider these findings when selecting provisional cements for 3D-printed crowns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BioMed Research International
BioMed Research International BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1942
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: BioMed Research International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in life sciences and medicine. The journal is divided into 55 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信