Victoria Talwar, Angela M. Crossman, Stephanie Block, Sonja Brubacher, Rachel Dianiska, Ana Karen Espinosa Becerra, Gail Goodman, Mary Lyn Huffman, Michael E. Lamb, Kamala London, David La Rooy, Thomas D. Lyon, Lindsay C. Malloy, Lauren Maltby, Van P. Nguyen Greco, Martine Powell, Jodi Quas, Corey J. Rood, Sydney D. Spyksma, Linda C. Steele, Zsofia Szojka, Yuerui Wu, Breanne Wylie
{"title":"与儿童和青少年进行调查访谈的紧迫问题和前景展望","authors":"Victoria Talwar, Angela M. Crossman, Stephanie Block, Sonja Brubacher, Rachel Dianiska, Ana Karen Espinosa Becerra, Gail Goodman, Mary Lyn Huffman, Michael E. Lamb, Kamala London, David La Rooy, Thomas D. Lyon, Lindsay C. Malloy, Lauren Maltby, Van P. Nguyen Greco, Martine Powell, Jodi Quas, Corey J. Rood, Sydney D. Spyksma, Linda C. Steele, Zsofia Szojka, Yuerui Wu, Breanne Wylie","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While there has been considerable research on investigative interviews with children over the last three decades, there remains much to learn. The aim of this paper was to identify some of the issues and prospects for future scientific study that most urgently need to be addressed. Across 10 commentaries, leading scholars and practitioners highlight areas where additional research is needed on investigative interview practices with youths. Overarching themes include the need for better understanding of rapport‐building and its impact, as well as greater focus on social‐cultural and developmental factors and the needs of adolescents. There are calls to examine how interviews are occurring in real‐world contexts to better inform best practice recommendations in the field, to find means for ensuring better adherence to best practices among various groups of practitioners, and to understand their importance and impact when not followed, including by those testifying in courts. All reflect the need to better address that recurring challenge of reliably and consistently eliciting accurate and credible information from potentially reluctant young witnesses.","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urgent issues and prospects on investigative interviews with children and adolescents\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Talwar, Angela M. Crossman, Stephanie Block, Sonja Brubacher, Rachel Dianiska, Ana Karen Espinosa Becerra, Gail Goodman, Mary Lyn Huffman, Michael E. Lamb, Kamala London, David La Rooy, Thomas D. Lyon, Lindsay C. Malloy, Lauren Maltby, Van P. Nguyen Greco, Martine Powell, Jodi Quas, Corey J. Rood, Sydney D. Spyksma, Linda C. Steele, Zsofia Szojka, Yuerui Wu, Breanne Wylie\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lcrp.12269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While there has been considerable research on investigative interviews with children over the last three decades, there remains much to learn. The aim of this paper was to identify some of the issues and prospects for future scientific study that most urgently need to be addressed. Across 10 commentaries, leading scholars and practitioners highlight areas where additional research is needed on investigative interview practices with youths. Overarching themes include the need for better understanding of rapport‐building and its impact, as well as greater focus on social‐cultural and developmental factors and the needs of adolescents. There are calls to examine how interviews are occurring in real‐world contexts to better inform best practice recommendations in the field, to find means for ensuring better adherence to best practices among various groups of practitioners, and to understand their importance and impact when not followed, including by those testifying in courts. All reflect the need to better address that recurring challenge of reliably and consistently eliciting accurate and credible information from potentially reluctant young witnesses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal and Criminological Psychology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal and Criminological Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12269\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12269","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Urgent issues and prospects on investigative interviews with children and adolescents
While there has been considerable research on investigative interviews with children over the last three decades, there remains much to learn. The aim of this paper was to identify some of the issues and prospects for future scientific study that most urgently need to be addressed. Across 10 commentaries, leading scholars and practitioners highlight areas where additional research is needed on investigative interview practices with youths. Overarching themes include the need for better understanding of rapport‐building and its impact, as well as greater focus on social‐cultural and developmental factors and the needs of adolescents. There are calls to examine how interviews are occurring in real‐world contexts to better inform best practice recommendations in the field, to find means for ensuring better adherence to best practices among various groups of practitioners, and to understand their importance and impact when not followed, including by those testifying in courts. All reflect the need to better address that recurring challenge of reliably and consistently eliciting accurate and credible information from potentially reluctant young witnesses.
期刊介绍:
Legal and Criminological Psychology publishes original papers in all areas of psychology and law: - victimology - policing and crime detection - crime prevention - management of offenders - mental health and the law - public attitudes to law - role of the expert witness - impact of law on behaviour - interviewing and eyewitness testimony - jury decision making - deception The journal publishes papers which advance professional and scientific knowledge defined broadly as the application of psychology to law and interdisciplinary enquiry in legal and psychological fields.