两种植物-昆虫相互作用的多尺度空间分析:景观、资源分布和其他昆虫的影响

IF 4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Guillem Pocull, Carina Baskett, Nicholas H. Barton
{"title":"两种植物-昆虫相互作用的多尺度空间分析:景观、资源分布和其他昆虫的影响","authors":"Guillem Pocull, Carina Baskett, Nicholas H. Barton","doi":"10.1007/s10980-024-01899-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Context</h3><p>Biotic resource exploitation is a critical determinant of species’ distributions. However, quantifying resource exploitation patterns through space and time can be difficult, complicating their incorporation in spatial ecology studies. Therefore, understanding the local drivers of spatial patterns of resource exploitation may contribute to better large-scale species distribution models.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>We investigated (1) how the resource exploitation patterns of two trophic interactions (plant–insect) are explained by insect behaviour, resource aggregation, and potential insect-insect interactions. We also analyzed how (2) resource patch size and (3) resource accessibility in a heterogeneous landscape affected host exploitation patterns.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We quantified nectar robbing by insects in the genus <i>Bombus</i> (bumblebees) and seed predation by <i>Brachypterolus vestitus</i> larvae (Antirrhinum beetle) on <i>Antirrhinum majus</i> L. (wild snapdragons) in the Pyrenees Mountains, Catalonia, Spain. We tested hypotheses about resource exploitation by integrating spatial analyses at multiple scales.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Both trophic interactions were aggregated, explained by the aggregation of their resource. At some scales, nectar robbing is more aggregated than the resource. Trophic interaction abundance is proportional to resource patch size, following the ideal free distribution model. Landscape features do not explain the locations exploited. Nectar robbing and seed predation occur together more often than expected.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings suggest that multiple biotic and ecological spatial factors may simultaneously affect resource exploitation at a local scale. These findings should be considered when developing agricultural projects, management plans and conservation policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54745,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Ecology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiscale spatial analysis of two plant–insect interactions: effects of landscape, resource distribution, and other insects\",\"authors\":\"Guillem Pocull, Carina Baskett, Nicholas H. Barton\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10980-024-01899-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Context</h3><p>Biotic resource exploitation is a critical determinant of species’ distributions. However, quantifying resource exploitation patterns through space and time can be difficult, complicating their incorporation in spatial ecology studies. Therefore, understanding the local drivers of spatial patterns of resource exploitation may contribute to better large-scale species distribution models.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objectives</h3><p>We investigated (1) how the resource exploitation patterns of two trophic interactions (plant–insect) are explained by insect behaviour, resource aggregation, and potential insect-insect interactions. We also analyzed how (2) resource patch size and (3) resource accessibility in a heterogeneous landscape affected host exploitation patterns.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>We quantified nectar robbing by insects in the genus <i>Bombus</i> (bumblebees) and seed predation by <i>Brachypterolus vestitus</i> larvae (Antirrhinum beetle) on <i>Antirrhinum majus</i> L. (wild snapdragons) in the Pyrenees Mountains, Catalonia, Spain. We tested hypotheses about resource exploitation by integrating spatial analyses at multiple scales.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Both trophic interactions were aggregated, explained by the aggregation of their resource. At some scales, nectar robbing is more aggregated than the resource. Trophic interaction abundance is proportional to resource patch size, following the ideal free distribution model. Landscape features do not explain the locations exploited. Nectar robbing and seed predation occur together more often than expected.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings suggest that multiple biotic and ecological spatial factors may simultaneously affect resource exploitation at a local scale. These findings should be considered when developing agricultural projects, management plans and conservation policies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape Ecology\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-01899-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-01899-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景生物资源开发是决定物种分布的关键因素。然而,在空间和时间上量化资源开发模式可能很困难,这使得将其纳入空间生态学研究变得更加复杂。因此,了解资源开发空间模式的局部驱动因素可能有助于更好地建立大规模物种分布模型。研究目的 我们研究了(1)昆虫行为、资源聚集和潜在的昆虫间相互作用如何解释两种营养相互作用(植物-昆虫)的资源开发模式。方法我们量化了西班牙加泰罗尼亚比利牛斯山脉中大黄蜂属昆虫抢夺花蜜的行为和野山椒甲虫幼虫捕食种子的行为。我们通过对多个尺度的空间分析进行整合,检验了有关资源开发的假设。在某些尺度上,抢夺花蜜比资源更聚集。营养交互作用的丰度与资源斑块的大小成正比,符合理想的自由分布模型。景观特征并不能解释被利用的地点。我们的研究结果表明,多种生物和生态空间因素可能同时影响局部范围的资源开发。在制定农业项目、管理计划和保护政策时应考虑这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multiscale spatial analysis of two plant–insect interactions: effects of landscape, resource distribution, and other insects

Multiscale spatial analysis of two plant–insect interactions: effects of landscape, resource distribution, and other insects

Context

Biotic resource exploitation is a critical determinant of species’ distributions. However, quantifying resource exploitation patterns through space and time can be difficult, complicating their incorporation in spatial ecology studies. Therefore, understanding the local drivers of spatial patterns of resource exploitation may contribute to better large-scale species distribution models.

Objectives

We investigated (1) how the resource exploitation patterns of two trophic interactions (plant–insect) are explained by insect behaviour, resource aggregation, and potential insect-insect interactions. We also analyzed how (2) resource patch size and (3) resource accessibility in a heterogeneous landscape affected host exploitation patterns.

Methods

We quantified nectar robbing by insects in the genus Bombus (bumblebees) and seed predation by Brachypterolus vestitus larvae (Antirrhinum beetle) on Antirrhinum majus L. (wild snapdragons) in the Pyrenees Mountains, Catalonia, Spain. We tested hypotheses about resource exploitation by integrating spatial analyses at multiple scales.

Results

Both trophic interactions were aggregated, explained by the aggregation of their resource. At some scales, nectar robbing is more aggregated than the resource. Trophic interaction abundance is proportional to resource patch size, following the ideal free distribution model. Landscape features do not explain the locations exploited. Nectar robbing and seed predation occur together more often than expected.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that multiple biotic and ecological spatial factors may simultaneously affect resource exploitation at a local scale. These findings should be considered when developing agricultural projects, management plans and conservation policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape Ecology
Landscape Ecology 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Landscape Ecology is the flagship journal of a well-established and rapidly developing interdisciplinary science that focuses explicitly on the ecological understanding of spatial heterogeneity. Landscape Ecology draws together expertise from both biophysical and socioeconomic sciences to explore basic and applied research questions concerning the ecology, conservation, management, design/planning, and sustainability of landscapes as coupled human-environment systems. Landscape ecology studies are characterized by spatially explicit methods in which spatial attributes and arrangements of landscape elements are directly analyzed and related to ecological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信