不同面部分化模式下下巴形态和下颌门齿长度的变化:来自 CBCT 记录的新见解

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Joseph G. Ghafari, Eliane G. Ziade, Ammar Kassab, Maria Saadeh, Anthony T. Macari
{"title":"不同面部分化模式下下巴形态和下颌门齿长度的变化:来自 CBCT 记录的新见解","authors":"Joseph G. Ghafari, Eliane G. Ziade, Ammar Kassab, Maria Saadeh, Anthony T. Macari","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimEvaluate constitutional differences in chin morphology and volume, and mandibular tooth size, between different facial divergence patterns.Materials and MethodsThe sample consisted of 284 pretreatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of growing and non‐growing patients who were stratified into 4 groups based on mandibular plane inclination to cranial base (SN) angle. Linear and angular measurements were made on the lateral CBCT images: mandibular lateral incisor crown (I‐C) total (I‐A) lengths, the distances between point D (centre of symphysis) and both incisor apex (D‐A) and menton (D‐Me) and between cemento‐enamel junction and menton (CEJ‐Me); chin width at the level of the central incisor apex (CWA) and point D (CWD); and the angles of the anterior and posterior symphyseal slopes. The volume of the symphysis was measured using a specialized 3D imaging software. Group differences and associations between parameters were gauged through the three‐way ANOVA analysis.ResultsI‐C, I‐A, D‐A, D‐Me and CEJ‐Me were greater in the hyperdivergent group (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .001). CWA and CWD were wider in the hypodivergent group (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .003). Volume of the chin and inter‐slope angles were similar in all groups (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &gt; .05). The anterior slope angle decreased with hyperdivegence (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .005) in opposite pattern to the posterior slope angle (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .005).ConclusionsShape differences in mandibular symphysis were observed between opposite divergence patterns. Mandibular incisors were longer with hyperdivergence and shorter with hypodivergence. However, chin volumes were similar across divergence groups. These findings underline the role of genetic and environmental factors that impact facial growth.","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation of chin morphology and mandibular incisor length in different facial divergence patterns: New insights from CBCT records\",\"authors\":\"Joseph G. Ghafari, Eliane G. Ziade, Ammar Kassab, Maria Saadeh, Anthony T. Macari\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ocr.12856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AimEvaluate constitutional differences in chin morphology and volume, and mandibular tooth size, between different facial divergence patterns.Materials and MethodsThe sample consisted of 284 pretreatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of growing and non‐growing patients who were stratified into 4 groups based on mandibular plane inclination to cranial base (SN) angle. Linear and angular measurements were made on the lateral CBCT images: mandibular lateral incisor crown (I‐C) total (I‐A) lengths, the distances between point D (centre of symphysis) and both incisor apex (D‐A) and menton (D‐Me) and between cemento‐enamel junction and menton (CEJ‐Me); chin width at the level of the central incisor apex (CWA) and point D (CWD); and the angles of the anterior and posterior symphyseal slopes. The volume of the symphysis was measured using a specialized 3D imaging software. Group differences and associations between parameters were gauged through the three‐way ANOVA analysis.ResultsI‐C, I‐A, D‐A, D‐Me and CEJ‐Me were greater in the hyperdivergent group (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .001). CWA and CWD were wider in the hypodivergent group (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .003). Volume of the chin and inter‐slope angles were similar in all groups (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &gt; .05). The anterior slope angle decreased with hyperdivegence (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .005) in opposite pattern to the posterior slope angle (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .005).ConclusionsShape differences in mandibular symphysis were observed between opposite divergence patterns. Mandibular incisors were longer with hyperdivergence and shorter with hypodivergence. However, chin volumes were similar across divergence groups. These findings underline the role of genetic and environmental factors that impact facial growth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12856\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12856","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

材料和方法样本包括 284 张生长期和非生长期患者的锥形束计算机断层扫描 (CBCT) 图像,这些患者根据下颌平面倾斜度与颅底 (SN) 角度被分为 4 组。在 CBCT 侧边图像上进行了线性和角度测量:下颌侧切牙牙冠(I-C)总长度(I-A)、D 点(牙合中心)与切牙顶点(D-A)和牙弓(D-Me)之间的距离以及牙本质-釉质交界处与牙弓(CEJ-Me)之间的距离;中切牙顶点(CWA)和 D 点(CWD)水平的颏宽;以及前后牙合斜坡的角度。使用专门的三维成像软件测量了干骺端的体积。结果I-C、I-A、D-A、D-Me和CEJ-Me在超发散组更大(p <.001)。低发散组的 CWA 和 CWD 更宽(p = .003)。所有组的颏部体积和斜坡间角相似(p > .05)。结论在不同的发散模式之间观察到下颌骨干骺端的形状差异。下颌切牙在高分异时较长,在低分异时较短。然而,各分化组的颏部体积相似。这些发现强调了遗传和环境因素对面部生长的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variation of chin morphology and mandibular incisor length in different facial divergence patterns: New insights from CBCT records
AimEvaluate constitutional differences in chin morphology and volume, and mandibular tooth size, between different facial divergence patterns.Materials and MethodsThe sample consisted of 284 pretreatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of growing and non‐growing patients who were stratified into 4 groups based on mandibular plane inclination to cranial base (SN) angle. Linear and angular measurements were made on the lateral CBCT images: mandibular lateral incisor crown (I‐C) total (I‐A) lengths, the distances between point D (centre of symphysis) and both incisor apex (D‐A) and menton (D‐Me) and between cemento‐enamel junction and menton (CEJ‐Me); chin width at the level of the central incisor apex (CWA) and point D (CWD); and the angles of the anterior and posterior symphyseal slopes. The volume of the symphysis was measured using a specialized 3D imaging software. Group differences and associations between parameters were gauged through the three‐way ANOVA analysis.ResultsI‐C, I‐A, D‐A, D‐Me and CEJ‐Me were greater in the hyperdivergent group (p < .001). CWA and CWD were wider in the hypodivergent group (p = .003). Volume of the chin and inter‐slope angles were similar in all groups (p > .05). The anterior slope angle decreased with hyperdivegence (p < .005) in opposite pattern to the posterior slope angle (p < .005).ConclusionsShape differences in mandibular symphysis were observed between opposite divergence patterns. Mandibular incisors were longer with hyperdivergence and shorter with hypodivergence. However, chin volumes were similar across divergence groups. These findings underline the role of genetic and environmental factors that impact facial growth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions. The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements. The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信