利用修正的卷积神经网络在多层螺旋计算机断层扫描上对下颌骨骨折进行自动检测和分类

Jingjing Mao MDS RES, Yuhu Du BCS, Jiawen Xue BDS RES, Jingjing Hu MDS RES, Qian Mai MDS ATP, Tao Zhou PhD, Zhongwei Zhou DDS PhD
{"title":"利用修正的卷积神经网络在多层螺旋计算机断层扫描上对下颌骨骨折进行自动检测和分类","authors":"Jingjing Mao MDS RES, Yuhu Du BCS, Jiawen Xue BDS RES, Jingjing Hu MDS RES, Qian Mai MDS ATP, Tao Zhou PhD, Zhongwei Zhou DDS PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the automated detection and classification of mandibular fractures on multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT). MSCT data from 361 patients with mandibular fractures were retrospectively collected. Two experienced maxillofacial surgeons annotated the images as ground truth. Fractures were detected utilizing the following models: YOLOv3, YOLOv4, Faster R-CNN, CenterNet, and YOLOv5-TRS. Fracture sites were classified by the following models: AlexNet, GoogLeNet, ResNet50, original DenseNet-121, and modified DenseNet-121. The performance was evaluated for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). AUC values were compared using the -test and values <.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Of all of the detection models, YOLOv5-TRS obtained the greatest mean accuracy (96.68%). Among all of the fracture subregions, body fractures were the most reliably detected (with accuracies of 88.59%-99.01%). For classification models, the AUCs for body fractures were higher than those of condyle and angle fractures, and they were all above 0.75, with the highest AUC at 0.903. Modified DenseNet-121 had the best overall classification performance with a mean AUC of 0.814. The modified CNN-based models demonstrated high reliability for the diagnosis of mandibular fractures on MSCT.","PeriodicalId":501075,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated detection and classification of mandibular fractures on multislice spiral computed tomography using modified convolutional neural networks\",\"authors\":\"Jingjing Mao MDS RES, Yuhu Du BCS, Jiawen Xue BDS RES, Jingjing Hu MDS RES, Qian Mai MDS ATP, Tao Zhou PhD, Zhongwei Zhou DDS PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.07.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To evaluate the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the automated detection and classification of mandibular fractures on multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT). MSCT data from 361 patients with mandibular fractures were retrospectively collected. Two experienced maxillofacial surgeons annotated the images as ground truth. Fractures were detected utilizing the following models: YOLOv3, YOLOv4, Faster R-CNN, CenterNet, and YOLOv5-TRS. Fracture sites were classified by the following models: AlexNet, GoogLeNet, ResNet50, original DenseNet-121, and modified DenseNet-121. The performance was evaluated for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). AUC values were compared using the -test and values <.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Of all of the detection models, YOLOv5-TRS obtained the greatest mean accuracy (96.68%). Among all of the fracture subregions, body fractures were the most reliably detected (with accuracies of 88.59%-99.01%). For classification models, the AUCs for body fractures were higher than those of condyle and angle fractures, and they were all above 0.75, with the highest AUC at 0.903. Modified DenseNet-121 had the best overall classification performance with a mean AUC of 0.814. The modified CNN-based models demonstrated high reliability for the diagnosis of mandibular fractures on MSCT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.07.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.07.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估卷积神经网络(CNN)在多层螺旋计算机断层扫描(MSCT)上对下颌骨骨折进行自动检测和分类的性能。回顾性收集了 361 名下颌骨骨折患者的 MSCT 数据。两名经验丰富的颌面外科医生对图像进行了注释,作为基本真相。利用以下模型检测骨折:YOLOv3、YOLOv4、Faster R-CNN、CenterNet 和 YOLOv5-TRS。用以下模型对断裂点进行分类:AlexNet、GoogLeNet、ResNet50、原始 DenseNet-121 和修改后的 DenseNet-121。根据准确性、灵敏度、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)对其性能进行了评估。AUC 值使用-检验进行比较,<.05 的值被认为具有统计学意义。在所有检测模型中,YOLOv5-TRS 的平均准确率最高(96.68%)。在所有骨折亚区域中,体部骨折的检测最为可靠(准确率为 88.59%-99.01%)。在分类模型中,体部骨折的 AUC 值高于髁部骨折和角部骨折,均在 0.75 以上,其中最高的 AUC 值为 0.903。改进型 DenseNet-121 的整体分类性能最佳,平均 AUC 为 0.814。基于改进型 CNN 的模型在 MSCT 下颌骨骨折诊断中表现出很高的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automated detection and classification of mandibular fractures on multislice spiral computed tomography using modified convolutional neural networks
To evaluate the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the automated detection and classification of mandibular fractures on multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT). MSCT data from 361 patients with mandibular fractures were retrospectively collected. Two experienced maxillofacial surgeons annotated the images as ground truth. Fractures were detected utilizing the following models: YOLOv3, YOLOv4, Faster R-CNN, CenterNet, and YOLOv5-TRS. Fracture sites were classified by the following models: AlexNet, GoogLeNet, ResNet50, original DenseNet-121, and modified DenseNet-121. The performance was evaluated for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). AUC values were compared using the -test and values <.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Of all of the detection models, YOLOv5-TRS obtained the greatest mean accuracy (96.68%). Among all of the fracture subregions, body fractures were the most reliably detected (with accuracies of 88.59%-99.01%). For classification models, the AUCs for body fractures were higher than those of condyle and angle fractures, and they were all above 0.75, with the highest AUC at 0.903. Modified DenseNet-121 had the best overall classification performance with a mean AUC of 0.814. The modified CNN-based models demonstrated high reliability for the diagnosis of mandibular fractures on MSCT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信