Jingjing Mao MDS, RES , Yuhu Du BCS , Jiawen Xue BDS, RES , Jingjing Hu MDS, RES , Qian Mai MDS, ATP , Tao Zhou PhD , Zhongwei Zhou DDS, PhD
{"title":"利用修正的卷积神经网络在多层螺旋计算机断层扫描上对下颌骨骨折进行自动检测和分类","authors":"Jingjing Mao MDS, RES , Yuhu Du BCS , Jiawen Xue BDS, RES , Jingjing Hu MDS, RES , Qian Mai MDS, ATP , Tao Zhou PhD , Zhongwei Zhou DDS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the automated detection and classification of mandibular fractures on multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT).</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>MSCT data from 361 patients with mandibular fractures were retrospectively collected. Two experienced maxillofacial surgeons annotated the images as ground truth. Fractures were detected utilizing the following models: YOLOv3, YOLOv4, Faster R-CNN, CenterNet, and YOLOv5-TRS. Fracture sites were classified by the following models: AlexNet, GoogLeNet, ResNet50, original DenseNet-121, and modified DenseNet-121. The performance was evaluated for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). AUC values were compared using the <em>Z</em>-test and <em>P</em> values <.05 were considered to be statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of all of the detection models, YOLOv5-TRS obtained the greatest mean accuracy (96.68%). Among all of the fracture subregions, body fractures were the most reliably detected (with accuracies of 88.59%-99.01%). For classification models, the AUCs for body fractures were higher than those of condyle and angle fractures, and they were all above 0.75, with the highest AUC at 0.903. Modified DenseNet-121 had the best overall classification performance with a mean AUC of 0.814.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The modified CNN-based models demonstrated high reliability for the diagnosis of mandibular fractures on MSCT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49010,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","volume":"138 6","pages":"Pages 803-812"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated detection and classification of mandibular fractures on multislice spiral computed tomography using modified convolutional neural networks\",\"authors\":\"Jingjing Mao MDS, RES , Yuhu Du BCS , Jiawen Xue BDS, RES , Jingjing Hu MDS, RES , Qian Mai MDS, ATP , Tao Zhou PhD , Zhongwei Zhou DDS, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.07.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the automated detection and classification of mandibular fractures on multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT).</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>MSCT data from 361 patients with mandibular fractures were retrospectively collected. Two experienced maxillofacial surgeons annotated the images as ground truth. Fractures were detected utilizing the following models: YOLOv3, YOLOv4, Faster R-CNN, CenterNet, and YOLOv5-TRS. Fracture sites were classified by the following models: AlexNet, GoogLeNet, ResNet50, original DenseNet-121, and modified DenseNet-121. The performance was evaluated for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). AUC values were compared using the <em>Z</em>-test and <em>P</em> values <.05 were considered to be statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of all of the detection models, YOLOv5-TRS obtained the greatest mean accuracy (96.68%). Among all of the fracture subregions, body fractures were the most reliably detected (with accuracies of 88.59%-99.01%). For classification models, the AUCs for body fractures were higher than those of condyle and angle fractures, and they were all above 0.75, with the highest AUC at 0.903. Modified DenseNet-121 had the best overall classification performance with a mean AUC of 0.814.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The modified CNN-based models demonstrated high reliability for the diagnosis of mandibular fractures on MSCT.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology\",\"volume\":\"138 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 803-812\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324004048\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324004048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Automated detection and classification of mandibular fractures on multislice spiral computed tomography using modified convolutional neural networks
Objective
To evaluate the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the automated detection and classification of mandibular fractures on multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT).
Study Design
MSCT data from 361 patients with mandibular fractures were retrospectively collected. Two experienced maxillofacial surgeons annotated the images as ground truth. Fractures were detected utilizing the following models: YOLOv3, YOLOv4, Faster R-CNN, CenterNet, and YOLOv5-TRS. Fracture sites were classified by the following models: AlexNet, GoogLeNet, ResNet50, original DenseNet-121, and modified DenseNet-121. The performance was evaluated for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). AUC values were compared using the Z-test and P values <.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Of all of the detection models, YOLOv5-TRS obtained the greatest mean accuracy (96.68%). Among all of the fracture subregions, body fractures were the most reliably detected (with accuracies of 88.59%-99.01%). For classification models, the AUCs for body fractures were higher than those of condyle and angle fractures, and they were all above 0.75, with the highest AUC at 0.903. Modified DenseNet-121 had the best overall classification performance with a mean AUC of 0.814.
Conclusions
The modified CNN-based models demonstrated high reliability for the diagnosis of mandibular fractures on MSCT.
期刊介绍:
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology is required reading for anyone in the fields of oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology or advanced general practice dentistry. It is the only major dental journal that provides a practical and complete overview of the medical and surgical techniques of dental practice in four areas. Topics covered include such current issues as dental implants, treatment of HIV-infected patients, and evaluation and treatment of TMJ disorders. The official publication for nine societies, the Journal is recommended for initial purchase in the Brandon Hill study, Selected List of Books and Journals for the Small Medical Library.