在下第三磨牙手术中联合使用布洛芬-L-精氨酸和地塞米松的预防性与先发制人:随机对照试验

Edson Luiz Cetira-Filho DDS MSc PhD, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva DDS MSc PhD, Isabelle de Fátima Vieira Camelo Maia CP, Deysi Viviana Tenazoa Wong MSc PhD, Roberto César Pereira Lima-Júnior Sc PhD, Ravy Jucá Farias DDS, Mayara Alves dos Anjos DDS student, Said Goncalves da Cruz Fonseca CP MSc PhD, Thyciana Rodrigues Ribeiro DDS MSc PhD, Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa DDS MSc PhD
{"title":"在下第三磨牙手术中联合使用布洛芬-L-精氨酸和地塞米松的预防性与先发制人:随机对照试验","authors":"Edson Luiz Cetira-Filho DDS MSc PhD, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva DDS MSc PhD, Isabelle de Fátima Vieira Camelo Maia CP, Deysi Viviana Tenazoa Wong MSc PhD, Roberto César Pereira Lima-Júnior Sc PhD, Ravy Jucá Farias DDS, Mayara Alves dos Anjos DDS student, Said Goncalves da Cruz Fonseca CP MSc PhD, Thyciana Rodrigues Ribeiro DDS MSc PhD, Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa DDS MSc PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To compare the effect of different preemptive and preventive analgesia strategies involving oral coadministration of ibuprofen-arginine (770 mg)–Ib-Ar and dexamethasone (8 mg)-DX, and their respective placebos (P-Ib-Ar and P-DX), four evaluation groups on inflammatory and laboratory parameters, impact on quality of life, pain catastrophizing perception and sleep quality related after lower third molar surgery. A randomized split-mouth, triple-blind, controlled clinical trial was conducted with 48 volunteers. They were allocated depending on the use of Ib-Ar or DX, 1 hour before surgery or immediately postoperatively, discriminating the groups: G1 (Ib-Ar + DX), G2 (Ib-Ar + P-DX), G3 (P-Ib-Ar + DX), and G4 (P-Ib-Ar + P-DX). Pain peaks occurred after 2 h (P-Ib-Ar groups) ( = .003), while the other groups showed peak pain after 4 h ( < .05). Regarding the edema: groups treated with placebos measurements significantly reduced without returning to baseline ( < .001). Regarding laboratory parameters: MPO and MDA levels, the G1 group ( < .001) was the only one showing significant reduction. The use of preemptive and preventive analgesia strategies of Ib-Ar and DX showed that the combined use delayed peak pain, with no difference in edema and trismus. The benefit of coadministration of both strategies was superior to isolated use of drugs.","PeriodicalId":501075,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preemptive vs preventive coadministration of ibuprofen L-arginine and dexamethasone in lower third molar surgeries: a randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Edson Luiz Cetira-Filho DDS MSc PhD, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva DDS MSc PhD, Isabelle de Fátima Vieira Camelo Maia CP, Deysi Viviana Tenazoa Wong MSc PhD, Roberto César Pereira Lima-Júnior Sc PhD, Ravy Jucá Farias DDS, Mayara Alves dos Anjos DDS student, Said Goncalves da Cruz Fonseca CP MSc PhD, Thyciana Rodrigues Ribeiro DDS MSc PhD, Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa DDS MSc PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To compare the effect of different preemptive and preventive analgesia strategies involving oral coadministration of ibuprofen-arginine (770 mg)–Ib-Ar and dexamethasone (8 mg)-DX, and their respective placebos (P-Ib-Ar and P-DX), four evaluation groups on inflammatory and laboratory parameters, impact on quality of life, pain catastrophizing perception and sleep quality related after lower third molar surgery. A randomized split-mouth, triple-blind, controlled clinical trial was conducted with 48 volunteers. They were allocated depending on the use of Ib-Ar or DX, 1 hour before surgery or immediately postoperatively, discriminating the groups: G1 (Ib-Ar + DX), G2 (Ib-Ar + P-DX), G3 (P-Ib-Ar + DX), and G4 (P-Ib-Ar + P-DX). Pain peaks occurred after 2 h (P-Ib-Ar groups) ( = .003), while the other groups showed peak pain after 4 h ( < .05). Regarding the edema: groups treated with placebos measurements significantly reduced without returning to baseline ( < .001). Regarding laboratory parameters: MPO and MDA levels, the G1 group ( < .001) was the only one showing significant reduction. The use of preemptive and preventive analgesia strategies of Ib-Ar and DX showed that the combined use delayed peak pain, with no difference in edema and trismus. The benefit of coadministration of both strategies was superior to isolated use of drugs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.08.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.08.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较不同的抢先和预防性镇痛策略(包括口服联合给药布洛芬-精氨酸(770 毫克)-Ib-Ar 和地塞米松(8 毫克)-DX,以及各自的安慰剂(P-Ib-Ar 和 P-DX))、四个评估组对下第三磨牙手术后炎症和实验室参数、对生活质量的影响、疼痛灾难化感知和睡眠质量的影响。对 48 名志愿者进行了随机分口三盲对照临床试验。他们根据术前 1 小时或术后立即使用 Ib-Ar 或 DX 的情况进行分配,并区分为不同的组别:G1组(Ib-Ar + DX)、G2组(Ib-Ar + P-DX)、G3组(P-Ib-Ar + DX)和G4组(P-Ib-Ar + P-DX)。疼痛峰值出现在 2 小时后(P-Ib-Ar 组)(= .003),而其他组的疼痛峰值出现在 4 小时后(< .05)。关于水肿:使用安慰剂治疗的各组水肿明显减轻,没有恢复到基线水平 ( < .001)。关于实验室参数:MPO和MDA水平,G1组(< .001)是唯一出现显著下降的组别。使用 Ib-Ar 和 DX 的先期和预防性镇痛策略表明,联合使用可延缓疼痛峰值,而在水肿和肢体瘫痪方面没有差异。联合使用这两种策略的效果优于单独使用药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preemptive vs preventive coadministration of ibuprofen L-arginine and dexamethasone in lower third molar surgeries: a randomized controlled trial
To compare the effect of different preemptive and preventive analgesia strategies involving oral coadministration of ibuprofen-arginine (770 mg)–Ib-Ar and dexamethasone (8 mg)-DX, and their respective placebos (P-Ib-Ar and P-DX), four evaluation groups on inflammatory and laboratory parameters, impact on quality of life, pain catastrophizing perception and sleep quality related after lower third molar surgery. A randomized split-mouth, triple-blind, controlled clinical trial was conducted with 48 volunteers. They were allocated depending on the use of Ib-Ar or DX, 1 hour before surgery or immediately postoperatively, discriminating the groups: G1 (Ib-Ar + DX), G2 (Ib-Ar + P-DX), G3 (P-Ib-Ar + DX), and G4 (P-Ib-Ar + P-DX). Pain peaks occurred after 2 h (P-Ib-Ar groups) ( = .003), while the other groups showed peak pain after 4 h ( < .05). Regarding the edema: groups treated with placebos measurements significantly reduced without returning to baseline ( < .001). Regarding laboratory parameters: MPO and MDA levels, the G1 group ( < .001) was the only one showing significant reduction. The use of preemptive and preventive analgesia strategies of Ib-Ar and DX showed that the combined use delayed peak pain, with no difference in edema and trismus. The benefit of coadministration of both strategies was superior to isolated use of drugs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信