Petros Yoon DDS, Brittany Klein DDS, Lama Alabdulaaly BDS DMSc, Abdulrahman Nakshabandi BDS, Mandlin Almousa DDS, Laurel Henderson DDS, Malak Al-Hadlaq BDS DMSc, Amal Bajonaid BDS DMSc, Piamkamon Vacharotayangul DDS PhD, Nathaniel Treister DMD DMSc, Stephen Sonis DMD DMSc
{"title":"美国口腔医学人才队伍及其对获得医疗服务的影响","authors":"Petros Yoon DDS, Brittany Klein DDS, Lama Alabdulaaly BDS DMSc, Abdulrahman Nakshabandi BDS, Mandlin Almousa DDS, Laurel Henderson DDS, Malak Al-Hadlaq BDS DMSc, Amal Bajonaid BDS DMSc, Piamkamon Vacharotayangul DDS PhD, Nathaniel Treister DMD DMSc, Stephen Sonis DMD DMSc","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to characterize the current oral medicine (OM) workforce by examining the distribution of OM diplomates (OMDs) across the Unites States and to determine the need for expanding access to care. The OMD access was calculated based on the OMDs per 10,000 state population from the 2020 US Census data as well as their distance from state capitals and most populated cities. OMD penetrance in hospitals and cancer centers was assessed at National Cancer Care Network (NCCN) cancer centers, and Best Hospitals as reported in the 2022 US News and World Report (USNWR). OMDs are present in 64% of the states with an uneven geographic distribution. Primary workplaces included dental schools (47%), hospitals (30%), and private practices (19%). Of the OMDs in private practice, 57% limited their practice to OM. OMDs were noted at 28% of NCCN cancer centers, 30% of USNWR Best Hospitals for Cancer, and 20% of USNWR Best Hospitals. There is low density and uneven distribution of OMDs with approximately one-third of the population without access to an OMD in their state, thus limiting access to care. This suggests both vast opportunities for growth and expansion of OM, as well as challenges in developing and training the necessary workforce. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol YEAR;VOL:page range)","PeriodicalId":501075,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Oral Medicine workforce and impact on access to care in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Petros Yoon DDS, Brittany Klein DDS, Lama Alabdulaaly BDS DMSc, Abdulrahman Nakshabandi BDS, Mandlin Almousa DDS, Laurel Henderson DDS, Malak Al-Hadlaq BDS DMSc, Amal Bajonaid BDS DMSc, Piamkamon Vacharotayangul DDS PhD, Nathaniel Treister DMD DMSc, Stephen Sonis DMD DMSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.08.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study was to characterize the current oral medicine (OM) workforce by examining the distribution of OM diplomates (OMDs) across the Unites States and to determine the need for expanding access to care. The OMD access was calculated based on the OMDs per 10,000 state population from the 2020 US Census data as well as their distance from state capitals and most populated cities. OMD penetrance in hospitals and cancer centers was assessed at National Cancer Care Network (NCCN) cancer centers, and Best Hospitals as reported in the 2022 US News and World Report (USNWR). OMDs are present in 64% of the states with an uneven geographic distribution. Primary workplaces included dental schools (47%), hospitals (30%), and private practices (19%). Of the OMDs in private practice, 57% limited their practice to OM. OMDs were noted at 28% of NCCN cancer centers, 30% of USNWR Best Hospitals for Cancer, and 20% of USNWR Best Hospitals. There is low density and uneven distribution of OMDs with approximately one-third of the population without access to an OMD in their state, thus limiting access to care. This suggests both vast opportunities for growth and expansion of OM, as well as challenges in developing and training the necessary workforce. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol YEAR;VOL:page range)\",\"PeriodicalId\":501075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.08.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2024.08.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Oral Medicine workforce and impact on access to care in the United States
The objective of this study was to characterize the current oral medicine (OM) workforce by examining the distribution of OM diplomates (OMDs) across the Unites States and to determine the need for expanding access to care. The OMD access was calculated based on the OMDs per 10,000 state population from the 2020 US Census data as well as their distance from state capitals and most populated cities. OMD penetrance in hospitals and cancer centers was assessed at National Cancer Care Network (NCCN) cancer centers, and Best Hospitals as reported in the 2022 US News and World Report (USNWR). OMDs are present in 64% of the states with an uneven geographic distribution. Primary workplaces included dental schools (47%), hospitals (30%), and private practices (19%). Of the OMDs in private practice, 57% limited their practice to OM. OMDs were noted at 28% of NCCN cancer centers, 30% of USNWR Best Hospitals for Cancer, and 20% of USNWR Best Hospitals. There is low density and uneven distribution of OMDs with approximately one-third of the population without access to an OMD in their state, thus limiting access to care. This suggests both vast opportunities for growth and expansion of OM, as well as challenges in developing and training the necessary workforce. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol YEAR;VOL:page range)