Jiho Ha, Jungkyun Shin, Kyoungmin Lim, In-Kwon Um, Boyeon Yi
{"title":"用于海床和超浅层地下分类的三维 UHR 地震和反向散射分析","authors":"Jiho Ha, Jungkyun Shin, Kyoungmin Lim, In-Kwon Um, Boyeon Yi","doi":"10.1007/s11600-024-01423-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recently, the seabed classification method based on back-scattering data of multi-beam echo-sounder (MBES) is widely used to analyze the distribution of seabed sediment. Although various analysis methods for seabed classification using multi-spectral MBES have been developed, they are limited in securing penetration depth to consider the characteristics of the shallow subsurface structure. In this study, the seabed and ultra-shallow subsurface classification was performed by comparative analysis of box corer sampling, back-scattering, and 2D/3D ultra-high-resolution (UHR) seismic data obtained from Yeongil Bay, South Korea. We proposed a process for seismic ultra-shallow subsurface classification by the segmentation of the primary seabed reflection wavelet and the amplitude analysis. The seabed-reflected amplitude and back-scattering intensity showed similar mapping trends in the relatively homogeneous and thick surface sediment. On the other hand, it was confirmed that back-scattering data and seabed-reflected amplitude show different patterns when the subsurface structure is related to the seabed surface. It is presumed that because seismic data containing relatively low-frequency components have a deeper penetration depth than MBES, they contain more characteristics of the ultra-shallow subsurface than back-scattering data. These were determined that back-scattering has advantages in representing acoustic anomaly distribution by surface sediment type, and seabed-reflected amplitude is advantageous for representing sediment type by ultra-shallow subsurface. In particular, these results were well shown when the surface sediment thinly covered the rocky bottom. Therefore, it is necessary not only to analyze the back-scattering of MBES but also the ultra-shallow subsurface features through seismic data for valid seabed classification.</p>","PeriodicalId":6988,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geophysica","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D UHR seismic and back-scattering analysis for seabed and ultra-shallow subsurface classification\",\"authors\":\"Jiho Ha, Jungkyun Shin, Kyoungmin Lim, In-Kwon Um, Boyeon Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11600-024-01423-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recently, the seabed classification method based on back-scattering data of multi-beam echo-sounder (MBES) is widely used to analyze the distribution of seabed sediment. Although various analysis methods for seabed classification using multi-spectral MBES have been developed, they are limited in securing penetration depth to consider the characteristics of the shallow subsurface structure. In this study, the seabed and ultra-shallow subsurface classification was performed by comparative analysis of box corer sampling, back-scattering, and 2D/3D ultra-high-resolution (UHR) seismic data obtained from Yeongil Bay, South Korea. We proposed a process for seismic ultra-shallow subsurface classification by the segmentation of the primary seabed reflection wavelet and the amplitude analysis. The seabed-reflected amplitude and back-scattering intensity showed similar mapping trends in the relatively homogeneous and thick surface sediment. On the other hand, it was confirmed that back-scattering data and seabed-reflected amplitude show different patterns when the subsurface structure is related to the seabed surface. It is presumed that because seismic data containing relatively low-frequency components have a deeper penetration depth than MBES, they contain more characteristics of the ultra-shallow subsurface than back-scattering data. These were determined that back-scattering has advantages in representing acoustic anomaly distribution by surface sediment type, and seabed-reflected amplitude is advantageous for representing sediment type by ultra-shallow subsurface. In particular, these results were well shown when the surface sediment thinly covered the rocky bottom. Therefore, it is necessary not only to analyze the back-scattering of MBES but also the ultra-shallow subsurface features through seismic data for valid seabed classification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Geophysica\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Geophysica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-024-01423-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-024-01423-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
3D UHR seismic and back-scattering analysis for seabed and ultra-shallow subsurface classification
Recently, the seabed classification method based on back-scattering data of multi-beam echo-sounder (MBES) is widely used to analyze the distribution of seabed sediment. Although various analysis methods for seabed classification using multi-spectral MBES have been developed, they are limited in securing penetration depth to consider the characteristics of the shallow subsurface structure. In this study, the seabed and ultra-shallow subsurface classification was performed by comparative analysis of box corer sampling, back-scattering, and 2D/3D ultra-high-resolution (UHR) seismic data obtained from Yeongil Bay, South Korea. We proposed a process for seismic ultra-shallow subsurface classification by the segmentation of the primary seabed reflection wavelet and the amplitude analysis. The seabed-reflected amplitude and back-scattering intensity showed similar mapping trends in the relatively homogeneous and thick surface sediment. On the other hand, it was confirmed that back-scattering data and seabed-reflected amplitude show different patterns when the subsurface structure is related to the seabed surface. It is presumed that because seismic data containing relatively low-frequency components have a deeper penetration depth than MBES, they contain more characteristics of the ultra-shallow subsurface than back-scattering data. These were determined that back-scattering has advantages in representing acoustic anomaly distribution by surface sediment type, and seabed-reflected amplitude is advantageous for representing sediment type by ultra-shallow subsurface. In particular, these results were well shown when the surface sediment thinly covered the rocky bottom. Therefore, it is necessary not only to analyze the back-scattering of MBES but also the ultra-shallow subsurface features through seismic data for valid seabed classification.
期刊介绍:
Acta Geophysica is open to all kinds of manuscripts including research and review articles, short communications, comments to published papers, letters to the Editor as well as book reviews. Some of the issues are fully devoted to particular topics; we do encourage proposals for such topical issues. We accept submissions from scientists world-wide, offering high scientific and editorial standard and comprehensive treatment of the discussed topics.