Killian Stokes-Rodriguez, Kaushik Jayasayee, Sidsel M. Hanetho, Jannicke Kvello, Peter P. Molesworth, Øystein Dahl, Nils Peter Wagner
{"title":"无碳酸乙烯酯电解质中的高压尖晶石║钛酸锂锂离子电池比较研究","authors":"Killian Stokes-Rodriguez, Kaushik Jayasayee, Sidsel M. Hanetho, Jannicke Kvello, Peter P. Molesworth, Øystein Dahl, Nils Peter Wagner","doi":"10.1002/batt.202400457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A persistent obstacle towards the realisation of high voltage cathodes is electrolyte instability where oxidation and transition metal dissolution manifest in rapid capacity failure with both issues connected to the presence of ethylene carbonate in the electrolyte. here, alternative electrolyte co‐solvents are investigated and compared, where the cyclic carbonate is replaced with sulfones ethyl methyl sulfone (EMS) and tetra methylene sulfone (TMS) and fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC). The best full cell performance was observed for cells cycled in a FEC/EMC (3/7) and FEC/EMC (1/1) electrolytes which exhibited 84‐85 % capacity retention after 500 cycles. TMS/EMC (3/7), was determined to be the best performing sulfone electrolyte and maintained 71% capacity after 500 cycles. Post‐mortem XPS analysis indicated different film forming mechanisms for the respective co‐solvent. A thicker cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) on the LNMO was observed for the FEC containing electrolytes (relative to when TMS was used as the co‐solvent) indicating more effective passivation of the reactive cathode surface which correlated well with the enhanced cycling stability observed. For LTO, more evidence of transition metal migration and a thicker solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer was observed for the sulfone electrolyte suggesting more parasitic anode‐electrolyte interactions and an inability to mitigate Mn2+/Ni2+ crosstalk.","PeriodicalId":132,"journal":{"name":"Batteries & Supercaps","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of High Voltage Spinel ║ Lithium Titanate Lithium‐ion Batteries in Ethylene Carbonate Free Electrolytes\",\"authors\":\"Killian Stokes-Rodriguez, Kaushik Jayasayee, Sidsel M. Hanetho, Jannicke Kvello, Peter P. Molesworth, Øystein Dahl, Nils Peter Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/batt.202400457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A persistent obstacle towards the realisation of high voltage cathodes is electrolyte instability where oxidation and transition metal dissolution manifest in rapid capacity failure with both issues connected to the presence of ethylene carbonate in the electrolyte. here, alternative electrolyte co‐solvents are investigated and compared, where the cyclic carbonate is replaced with sulfones ethyl methyl sulfone (EMS) and tetra methylene sulfone (TMS) and fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC). The best full cell performance was observed for cells cycled in a FEC/EMC (3/7) and FEC/EMC (1/1) electrolytes which exhibited 84‐85 % capacity retention after 500 cycles. TMS/EMC (3/7), was determined to be the best performing sulfone electrolyte and maintained 71% capacity after 500 cycles. Post‐mortem XPS analysis indicated different film forming mechanisms for the respective co‐solvent. A thicker cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) on the LNMO was observed for the FEC containing electrolytes (relative to when TMS was used as the co‐solvent) indicating more effective passivation of the reactive cathode surface which correlated well with the enhanced cycling stability observed. For LTO, more evidence of transition metal migration and a thicker solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer was observed for the sulfone electrolyte suggesting more parasitic anode‐electrolyte interactions and an inability to mitigate Mn2+/Ni2+ crosstalk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Batteries & Supercaps\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Batteries & Supercaps\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.202400457\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ELECTROCHEMISTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Batteries & Supercaps","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.202400457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ELECTROCHEMISTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Study of High Voltage Spinel ║ Lithium Titanate Lithium‐ion Batteries in Ethylene Carbonate Free Electrolytes
A persistent obstacle towards the realisation of high voltage cathodes is electrolyte instability where oxidation and transition metal dissolution manifest in rapid capacity failure with both issues connected to the presence of ethylene carbonate in the electrolyte. here, alternative electrolyte co‐solvents are investigated and compared, where the cyclic carbonate is replaced with sulfones ethyl methyl sulfone (EMS) and tetra methylene sulfone (TMS) and fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC). The best full cell performance was observed for cells cycled in a FEC/EMC (3/7) and FEC/EMC (1/1) electrolytes which exhibited 84‐85 % capacity retention after 500 cycles. TMS/EMC (3/7), was determined to be the best performing sulfone electrolyte and maintained 71% capacity after 500 cycles. Post‐mortem XPS analysis indicated different film forming mechanisms for the respective co‐solvent. A thicker cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) on the LNMO was observed for the FEC containing electrolytes (relative to when TMS was used as the co‐solvent) indicating more effective passivation of the reactive cathode surface which correlated well with the enhanced cycling stability observed. For LTO, more evidence of transition metal migration and a thicker solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer was observed for the sulfone electrolyte suggesting more parasitic anode‐electrolyte interactions and an inability to mitigate Mn2+/Ni2+ crosstalk.
期刊介绍:
Electrochemical energy storage devices play a transformative role in our societies. They have allowed the emergence of portable electronics devices, have triggered the resurgence of electric transportation and constitute key components in smart power grids. Batteries & Supercaps publishes international high-impact experimental and theoretical research on the fundamentals and applications of electrochemical energy storage. We support the scientific community to advance energy efficiency and sustainability.