无碳酸乙烯酯电解质中的高压尖晶石║钛酸锂锂离子电池比较研究

IF 5.1 4区 材料科学 Q2 ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Killian Stokes-Rodriguez, Kaushik Jayasayee, Sidsel M. Hanetho, Jannicke Kvello, Peter P. Molesworth, Øystein Dahl, Nils Peter Wagner
{"title":"无碳酸乙烯酯电解质中的高压尖晶石║钛酸锂锂离子电池比较研究","authors":"Killian Stokes-Rodriguez, Kaushik Jayasayee, Sidsel M. Hanetho, Jannicke Kvello, Peter P. Molesworth, Øystein Dahl, Nils Peter Wagner","doi":"10.1002/batt.202400457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A persistent obstacle towards the realisation of high voltage cathodes is electrolyte instability where oxidation and transition metal dissolution manifest in rapid capacity failure with both issues connected to the presence of ethylene carbonate in the electrolyte. here, alternative electrolyte co‐solvents are investigated and compared, where the cyclic carbonate is replaced with sulfones ethyl methyl sulfone (EMS) and tetra methylene sulfone (TMS) and fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC). The best full cell performance was observed for cells cycled in a FEC/EMC (3/7) and FEC/EMC (1/1) electrolytes which exhibited 84‐85 % capacity retention after 500 cycles. TMS/EMC (3/7), was determined to be the best performing sulfone electrolyte and maintained 71% capacity after 500 cycles. Post‐mortem XPS analysis indicated different film forming mechanisms for the respective co‐solvent. A thicker cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) on the LNMO was observed for the FEC containing electrolytes (relative to when TMS was used as the co‐solvent) indicating more effective passivation of the reactive cathode surface which correlated well with the enhanced cycling stability observed. For LTO, more evidence of transition metal migration and a thicker solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer was observed for the sulfone electrolyte suggesting more parasitic anode‐electrolyte interactions and an inability to mitigate Mn2+/Ni2+ crosstalk.","PeriodicalId":132,"journal":{"name":"Batteries & Supercaps","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of High Voltage Spinel ║ Lithium Titanate Lithium‐ion Batteries in Ethylene Carbonate Free Electrolytes\",\"authors\":\"Killian Stokes-Rodriguez, Kaushik Jayasayee, Sidsel M. Hanetho, Jannicke Kvello, Peter P. Molesworth, Øystein Dahl, Nils Peter Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/batt.202400457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A persistent obstacle towards the realisation of high voltage cathodes is electrolyte instability where oxidation and transition metal dissolution manifest in rapid capacity failure with both issues connected to the presence of ethylene carbonate in the electrolyte. here, alternative electrolyte co‐solvents are investigated and compared, where the cyclic carbonate is replaced with sulfones ethyl methyl sulfone (EMS) and tetra methylene sulfone (TMS) and fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC). The best full cell performance was observed for cells cycled in a FEC/EMC (3/7) and FEC/EMC (1/1) electrolytes which exhibited 84‐85 % capacity retention after 500 cycles. TMS/EMC (3/7), was determined to be the best performing sulfone electrolyte and maintained 71% capacity after 500 cycles. Post‐mortem XPS analysis indicated different film forming mechanisms for the respective co‐solvent. A thicker cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) on the LNMO was observed for the FEC containing electrolytes (relative to when TMS was used as the co‐solvent) indicating more effective passivation of the reactive cathode surface which correlated well with the enhanced cycling stability observed. For LTO, more evidence of transition metal migration and a thicker solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer was observed for the sulfone electrolyte suggesting more parasitic anode‐electrolyte interactions and an inability to mitigate Mn2+/Ni2+ crosstalk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Batteries & Supercaps\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Batteries & Supercaps\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.202400457\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ELECTROCHEMISTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Batteries & Supercaps","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.202400457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ELECTROCHEMISTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实现高压阴极的一个长期障碍是电解液的不稳定性,氧化和过渡金属溶解会导致容量快速衰减,而这两个问题都与电解液中存在碳酸乙烯酯有关。在此,我们研究并比较了替代电解液共溶剂,即用砜类化合物甲基砜乙酯 (EMS) 和四亚甲基砜 (TMS) 以及氟乙烯碳酸酯 (FEC) 替代环状碳酸酯。在 FEC/EMC (3/7) 和 FEC/EMC (1/1) 电解质中循环的电池具有最佳的全电池性能,在循环 500 次后,电池容量保持率为 84-85%。TMS/EMC (3/7) 被确定为性能最佳的砜类电解质,在循环 500 次后可保持 71% 的容量。死后 XPS 分析表明,不同的共溶剂具有不同的成膜机制。在含有 FEC 的电解质中(与使用 TMS 作为辅助溶剂时相比),LNMO 上的阴极电解质相(CEI)更厚,这表明活性阴极表面的钝化更有效,这与观察到的循环稳定性增强密切相关。就 LTO 而言,在砜电解质中观察到更多过渡金属迁移的迹象和更厚的固体电解质相间层 (SEI),这表明阳极与电解质之间的寄生相互作用更多,而且无法减轻 Mn2+/Ni2+ 的串扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of High Voltage Spinel ║ Lithium Titanate Lithium‐ion Batteries in Ethylene Carbonate Free Electrolytes
A persistent obstacle towards the realisation of high voltage cathodes is electrolyte instability where oxidation and transition metal dissolution manifest in rapid capacity failure with both issues connected to the presence of ethylene carbonate in the electrolyte. here, alternative electrolyte co‐solvents are investigated and compared, where the cyclic carbonate is replaced with sulfones ethyl methyl sulfone (EMS) and tetra methylene sulfone (TMS) and fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC). The best full cell performance was observed for cells cycled in a FEC/EMC (3/7) and FEC/EMC (1/1) electrolytes which exhibited 84‐85 % capacity retention after 500 cycles. TMS/EMC (3/7), was determined to be the best performing sulfone electrolyte and maintained 71% capacity after 500 cycles. Post‐mortem XPS analysis indicated different film forming mechanisms for the respective co‐solvent. A thicker cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) on the LNMO was observed for the FEC containing electrolytes (relative to when TMS was used as the co‐solvent) indicating more effective passivation of the reactive cathode surface which correlated well with the enhanced cycling stability observed. For LTO, more evidence of transition metal migration and a thicker solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer was observed for the sulfone electrolyte suggesting more parasitic anode‐electrolyte interactions and an inability to mitigate Mn2+/Ni2+ crosstalk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
223
期刊介绍: Electrochemical energy storage devices play a transformative role in our societies. They have allowed the emergence of portable electronics devices, have triggered the resurgence of electric transportation and constitute key components in smart power grids. Batteries & Supercaps publishes international high-impact experimental and theoretical research on the fundamentals and applications of electrochemical energy storage. We support the scientific community to advance energy efficiency and sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信