既往腹部手术和腹膜转移时间对影像学预测手术 PCI 准确性的影响:PRECINCT 研究报告。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Aditi Bhatt,Pascal Rousset,Brendan J Moran,Mudaddal Kazi,Dario Baratti,David Morris,Daniel Labow,Armando Sardi,Paolo Sammartino,Olivier Glehen,
{"title":"既往腹部手术和腹膜转移时间对影像学预测手术 PCI 准确性的影响:PRECINCT 研究报告。","authors":"Aditi Bhatt,Pascal Rousset,Brendan J Moran,Mudaddal Kazi,Dario Baratti,David Morris,Daniel Labow,Armando Sardi,Paolo Sammartino,Olivier Glehen,","doi":"10.1002/jso.27868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND AIM\r\nIn this report from Phase 1 of the prospective, observational, PRECINCT (Pattern of peritoneal dissemination and REsponse to systemic Chemotherapy IN Common and uncommon peritoneal Tumours) study, a correlation was performed between the radiological PCI (peritoneal cancer index; rPCI) and surgical PCI (sPCI). The impact of timing of peritoneal malignancy (PM) and previous abdominal surgery was also studied.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe rPCI and sPCI were considered the 'same' if they differed by ≤ 3 points. The agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and the strength of the agreement was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The extent of prior surgery was classified according to prior surgical score (PSS).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nIn 707 (79.4%) patients, rPCI and sPCI concurred in 280 (39.6%). In the Bland-Altman analysis, < 40% patients were in the ±3 PCI points limit of acceptable difference. The average difference between the two scores was 4.5 points (95% CI- -5.16 to -3.92). The CCC- was 0.59 for the whole cohort ('moderate' concordance) and was not influenced by imaging modality, timing of PM or PSS.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe rPCI underestimated sPCI by an average of 4.5 points. The role of peritoneal MRI in patients undergoing iterative procedures and the performance of imaging according to sites of recurrence need further evaluation.","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Previous Abdominal Surgery and Timing of Peritoneal Metastases on Accuracy of Imaging in Predicting the Surgical PCI: A Report From the PRECINCT Study.\",\"authors\":\"Aditi Bhatt,Pascal Rousset,Brendan J Moran,Mudaddal Kazi,Dario Baratti,David Morris,Daniel Labow,Armando Sardi,Paolo Sammartino,Olivier Glehen,\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.27868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND AND AIM\\r\\nIn this report from Phase 1 of the prospective, observational, PRECINCT (Pattern of peritoneal dissemination and REsponse to systemic Chemotherapy IN Common and uncommon peritoneal Tumours) study, a correlation was performed between the radiological PCI (peritoneal cancer index; rPCI) and surgical PCI (sPCI). The impact of timing of peritoneal malignancy (PM) and previous abdominal surgery was also studied.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThe rPCI and sPCI were considered the 'same' if they differed by ≤ 3 points. The agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and the strength of the agreement was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The extent of prior surgery was classified according to prior surgical score (PSS).\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nIn 707 (79.4%) patients, rPCI and sPCI concurred in 280 (39.6%). In the Bland-Altman analysis, < 40% patients were in the ±3 PCI points limit of acceptable difference. The average difference between the two scores was 4.5 points (95% CI- -5.16 to -3.92). The CCC- was 0.59 for the whole cohort ('moderate' concordance) and was not influenced by imaging modality, timing of PM or PSS.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nThe rPCI underestimated sPCI by an average of 4.5 points. The role of peritoneal MRI in patients undergoing iterative procedures and the performance of imaging according to sites of recurrence need further evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27868\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的在这项前瞻性、观察性 PRECINCT(常见和不常见腹膜肿瘤的腹膜扩散模式和对全身化疗的反应)研究的第一阶段报告中,对放射学 PCI(腹膜癌指数;rPCI)和手术 PCI(sPCI)进行了相关性分析。方法rPCI和sPCI如果相差≤3点,则被视为 "相同"。采用布兰-阿尔特曼分析法评估两者的一致性,并采用一致性相关系数(CCC)评估两者的一致性强度。结果 在 707 名(79.4%)患者中,280 名(39.6%)患者的 rPCI 和 sPCI 一致。在 Bland-Altman 分析中,< 40% 的患者处于可接受差异的 ±3 PCI 点范围内。两个评分之间的平均差异为 4.5 分(95% CI- -5.16~-3.92)。整个队列的 CCC- 为 0.59("中等 "一致性),不受成像方式、PM 或 PSS 时间的影响。腹膜磁共振成像在接受迭代手术患者中的作用以及根据复发部位进行成像的性能需要进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Previous Abdominal Surgery and Timing of Peritoneal Metastases on Accuracy of Imaging in Predicting the Surgical PCI: A Report From the PRECINCT Study.
BACKGROUND AND AIM In this report from Phase 1 of the prospective, observational, PRECINCT (Pattern of peritoneal dissemination and REsponse to systemic Chemotherapy IN Common and uncommon peritoneal Tumours) study, a correlation was performed between the radiological PCI (peritoneal cancer index; rPCI) and surgical PCI (sPCI). The impact of timing of peritoneal malignancy (PM) and previous abdominal surgery was also studied. METHODS The rPCI and sPCI were considered the 'same' if they differed by ≤ 3 points. The agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and the strength of the agreement was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The extent of prior surgery was classified according to prior surgical score (PSS). RESULTS In 707 (79.4%) patients, rPCI and sPCI concurred in 280 (39.6%). In the Bland-Altman analysis, < 40% patients were in the ±3 PCI points limit of acceptable difference. The average difference between the two scores was 4.5 points (95% CI- -5.16 to -3.92). The CCC- was 0.59 for the whole cohort ('moderate' concordance) and was not influenced by imaging modality, timing of PM or PSS. CONCLUSIONS The rPCI underestimated sPCI by an average of 4.5 points. The role of peritoneal MRI in patients undergoing iterative procedures and the performance of imaging according to sites of recurrence need further evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信