针对恶性腹膜间皮瘤的细胞剥脱手术和腹腔内加热化疗的灌注策略

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Claire Drigotas, Alexander W. Loftus, John B. Ammori, Luke D. Rothermel, Richard S. Hoehn
{"title":"针对恶性腹膜间皮瘤的细胞剥脱手术和腹腔内加热化疗的灌注策略","authors":"Claire Drigotas, Alexander W. Loftus, John B. Ammori, Luke D. Rothermel, Richard S. Hoehn","doi":"10.1002/jso.27882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to improve survival for patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM). Presently, there is no standardized HIPEC protocol with respect to chemotherapeutic agent, dose, administration temperature, or duration and limited literature comparing outcomes in different regimens. In this study, we analyze common practices and outcomes of published HIPEC regimens to gain insight into current practice to inform future directions of study. We conducted a literature search for investigational studies of CRS and HIPEC for MPM treatment in adults and identified 35 such articles. These studies were analyzed for institution type and location, drug regimens, perfusion temperatures and time, and study outcomes including median survival, complication rates, and perioperative mortality rates. On review, there is significant heterogeneity in HIPEC regimens and outcome reporting metrics, suggesting a need for multi‐institutional standardized study protocols to better determine the safest and most efficacious treatment regimen.","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perfusion Strategies for Cytoreductive Surgery With Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma\",\"authors\":\"Claire Drigotas, Alexander W. Loftus, John B. Ammori, Luke D. Rothermel, Richard S. Hoehn\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.27882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to improve survival for patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM). Presently, there is no standardized HIPEC protocol with respect to chemotherapeutic agent, dose, administration temperature, or duration and limited literature comparing outcomes in different regimens. In this study, we analyze common practices and outcomes of published HIPEC regimens to gain insight into current practice to inform future directions of study. We conducted a literature search for investigational studies of CRS and HIPEC for MPM treatment in adults and identified 35 such articles. These studies were analyzed for institution type and location, drug regimens, perfusion temperatures and time, and study outcomes including median survival, complication rates, and perioperative mortality rates. On review, there is significant heterogeneity in HIPEC regimens and outcome reporting metrics, suggesting a need for multi‐institutional standardized study protocols to better determine the safest and most efficacious treatment regimen.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27882\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27882","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有研究表明,细胞减灭术(CRS)配合术中腹腔内加热化疗(HIPEC)可提高恶性腹膜间皮瘤(MPM)患者的生存率。目前,在化疗药物、剂量、给药温度或持续时间方面还没有标准化的 HIPEC 方案,比较不同方案疗效的文献也很有限。在本研究中,我们分析了已发表的 HIPEC 方案的常见做法和结果,以深入了解当前的做法,为未来的研究方向提供参考。我们对用于成人 MPM 治疗的 CRS 和 HIPEC 的调查性研究进行了文献检索,发现了 35 篇此类文章。我们对这些研究的机构类型和地点、药物方案、灌注温度和时间以及研究结果(包括中位生存率、并发症发生率和围手术期死亡率)进行了分析。综上所述,HIPEC治疗方案和结果报告指标存在明显的异质性,这表明需要制定多机构标准化研究方案,以更好地确定最安全、最有效的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perfusion Strategies for Cytoreductive Surgery With Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to improve survival for patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM). Presently, there is no standardized HIPEC protocol with respect to chemotherapeutic agent, dose, administration temperature, or duration and limited literature comparing outcomes in different regimens. In this study, we analyze common practices and outcomes of published HIPEC regimens to gain insight into current practice to inform future directions of study. We conducted a literature search for investigational studies of CRS and HIPEC for MPM treatment in adults and identified 35 such articles. These studies were analyzed for institution type and location, drug regimens, perfusion temperatures and time, and study outcomes including median survival, complication rates, and perioperative mortality rates. On review, there is significant heterogeneity in HIPEC regimens and outcome reporting metrics, suggesting a need for multi‐institutional standardized study protocols to better determine the safest and most efficacious treatment regimen.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信