人工智能法:重要概述

Nuno Sousa e Silva
{"title":"人工智能法:重要概述","authors":"Nuno Sousa e Silva","doi":"arxiv-2409.00264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a critical overview of the recently approved Artificial\nIntelligence Act. It starts by presenting the main structure, objectives, and\napproach of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. A definition of key concepts follows,\nand then the material and territorial scope, as well as the timing of\napplication, are analyzed. Although the Regulation does not explicitly set out\nprinciples, the main ideas of fairness, accountability, transparency, and\nequity in AI underly a set of rules of the regulation. This is discussed before\nlooking at the ill-defined set of forbidden AI practices (manipulation and e\nexploitation of vulnerabilities, social scoring, biometric identification and\nclassification, and predictive policing). It is highlighted that those rules\ndeal with behaviors rather than AI systems. The qualification and regulation of\nhigh-risk AI systems are tackled, alongside the obligation of transparency for\ncertain systems, the regulation of general-purpose models, and the rules on\ncertification, supervision, and sanctions. The text concludes that even if the\noverall framework can be deemed adequate and balanced, the approach is so\ncomplex that it risks defeating its own purpose of promoting responsible\ninnovation within the European Union and beyond its borders.","PeriodicalId":501112,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society","volume":"180 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Artificial Intelligence Act: critical overview\",\"authors\":\"Nuno Sousa e Silva\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.00264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article provides a critical overview of the recently approved Artificial\\nIntelligence Act. It starts by presenting the main structure, objectives, and\\napproach of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. A definition of key concepts follows,\\nand then the material and territorial scope, as well as the timing of\\napplication, are analyzed. Although the Regulation does not explicitly set out\\nprinciples, the main ideas of fairness, accountability, transparency, and\\nequity in AI underly a set of rules of the regulation. This is discussed before\\nlooking at the ill-defined set of forbidden AI practices (manipulation and e\\nexploitation of vulnerabilities, social scoring, biometric identification and\\nclassification, and predictive policing). It is highlighted that those rules\\ndeal with behaviors rather than AI systems. The qualification and regulation of\\nhigh-risk AI systems are tackled, alongside the obligation of transparency for\\ncertain systems, the regulation of general-purpose models, and the rules on\\ncertification, supervision, and sanctions. The text concludes that even if the\\noverall framework can be deemed adequate and balanced, the approach is so\\ncomplex that it risks defeating its own purpose of promoting responsible\\ninnovation within the European Union and beyond its borders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society\",\"volume\":\"180 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.00264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computers and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.00264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对最近通过的《人工智能法》进行了批判性概述。文章首先介绍了条例(欧盟)2024/1689 的主要结构、目标和方法。随后对关键概念进行了定义,并分析了适用的材料和领土范围以及时间安排。虽然该条例没有明确规定原则,但公平、问责、透明和人工智能平等的主要理念是该条例一系列规则的基础。在讨论这一点之前,我们先来看看这套定义不明的禁止人工智能做法(操纵和电子利用漏洞、社会评分、生物识别和分类以及预测性警务)。需要强调的是,这些规则针对的是行为而非人工智能系统。文中讨论了高风险人工智能系统的资格认证和监管,以及某些系统的透明度义务、通用模型的监管以及认证、监督和制裁规则。文章最后指出,即使整体框架可以被认为是适当和平衡的,但这种方法过于复杂,有可能违背其在欧盟内部及其边界之外促进负责任创新的初衷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Artificial Intelligence Act: critical overview
This article provides a critical overview of the recently approved Artificial Intelligence Act. It starts by presenting the main structure, objectives, and approach of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. A definition of key concepts follows, and then the material and territorial scope, as well as the timing of application, are analyzed. Although the Regulation does not explicitly set out principles, the main ideas of fairness, accountability, transparency, and equity in AI underly a set of rules of the regulation. This is discussed before looking at the ill-defined set of forbidden AI practices (manipulation and e exploitation of vulnerabilities, social scoring, biometric identification and classification, and predictive policing). It is highlighted that those rules deal with behaviors rather than AI systems. The qualification and regulation of high-risk AI systems are tackled, alongside the obligation of transparency for certain systems, the regulation of general-purpose models, and the rules on certification, supervision, and sanctions. The text concludes that even if the overall framework can be deemed adequate and balanced, the approach is so complex that it risks defeating its own purpose of promoting responsible innovation within the European Union and beyond its borders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信