使用手持式光谱设备对钶钽铁矿石进行地理指纹识别

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING
Samuel Kessinger, Jon Kellar, Prasoon Diwakar
{"title":"使用手持式光谱设备对钶钽铁矿石进行地理指纹识别","authors":"Samuel Kessinger, Jon Kellar, Prasoon Diwakar","doi":"10.1007/s42461-024-01030-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Following the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010, specifically Sect. 1502, US companies have been required to report utilizing conflict minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The conflict mineral coltan, an ore consisting of elements tantalum and niobium, is central to this issue and engenders the need to track and trace the mineral’s supply chain. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) have been used, in combination with both unsupervised and supervised machine learning, to accurately classify coltan samples with known provenances. Sample spectra were first used as input data into unsupervised machine learning clustering algorithms, upon which dendrogram and constellation plots were generated. The classification achieved via unsupervised machine learning provided the proof of concept necessary to further investigate classification using supervised machine learning algorithms. The sample’s raw spectra were then used to train a supervised machine learning algorithm, consisting of a voting classifier relying on the results from random forest classifier (RFC), linear regression classifier (LRC), support vector classifier (SVC), and multi-layer perceptron classifier (MLPC). The classification achieved using raw spectra was able to achieve accuracies up to ~ 97%. The samples’ raw spectra were pre-processed using principal component analysis (PCA), and the pre-processed data was fed into the same supervised machine learning classifier described above. Accuracies of ~ 98% and ~ 96%, respectively, were achieved. When reviewing the predicted classifications arising from the use of these two different types of spectra, specifically reviewing the confidence score associated with each predicted provenance classification, it was possible to account for the incorrect provenance classifications returned by the voting classifier. If the predicted provenance and associated confidence score obtained via each spectra type was compared to the resulting provenance prediction and confidence score obtained by the other spectra type, and only the prediction with the higher associated confidence score was used, classification accuracies of 100% could be achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":18588,"journal":{"name":"Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geofingerprinting of Coltan Using Handheld Spectroscopic Devices\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Kessinger, Jon Kellar, Prasoon Diwakar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42461-024-01030-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Following the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010, specifically Sect. 1502, US companies have been required to report utilizing conflict minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The conflict mineral coltan, an ore consisting of elements tantalum and niobium, is central to this issue and engenders the need to track and trace the mineral’s supply chain. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) have been used, in combination with both unsupervised and supervised machine learning, to accurately classify coltan samples with known provenances. Sample spectra were first used as input data into unsupervised machine learning clustering algorithms, upon which dendrogram and constellation plots were generated. The classification achieved via unsupervised machine learning provided the proof of concept necessary to further investigate classification using supervised machine learning algorithms. The sample’s raw spectra were then used to train a supervised machine learning algorithm, consisting of a voting classifier relying on the results from random forest classifier (RFC), linear regression classifier (LRC), support vector classifier (SVC), and multi-layer perceptron classifier (MLPC). The classification achieved using raw spectra was able to achieve accuracies up to ~ 97%. The samples’ raw spectra were pre-processed using principal component analysis (PCA), and the pre-processed data was fed into the same supervised machine learning classifier described above. Accuracies of ~ 98% and ~ 96%, respectively, were achieved. When reviewing the predicted classifications arising from the use of these two different types of spectra, specifically reviewing the confidence score associated with each predicted provenance classification, it was possible to account for the incorrect provenance classifications returned by the voting classifier. If the predicted provenance and associated confidence score obtained via each spectra type was compared to the resulting provenance prediction and confidence score obtained by the other spectra type, and only the prediction with the higher associated confidence score was used, classification accuracies of 100% could be achieved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-024-01030-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-024-01030-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多德-弗兰克法案》(Dodd-Frank Act)于 2010 年颁布,特别是第 1502 条规定,美国公司必须报告使用来自刚果民主共和国(DRC)的冲突矿产的情况。冲突矿产钶钽铁矿石是由钽和铌元素组成的矿石,它是这一问题的核心,因此需要跟踪和追溯该矿产的供应链。X 射线荧光 (XRF) 和激光诱导击穿光谱 (LIBS) 与无监督和有监督机器学习相结合,用于对已知产地的钶钽铁矿样品进行精确分类。样品光谱首先被用作无监督机器学习聚类算法的输入数据,然后生成树枝图和星座图。通过无监督机器学习实现的分类为进一步研究使用有监督机器学习算法进行分类提供了必要的概念验证。样本的原始光谱随后被用于训练有监督机器学习算法,该算法由投票分类器组成,投票分类器依赖于随机森林分类器(RFC)、线性回归分类器(LRC)、支持向量分类器(SVC)和多层感知器分类器(MLPC)的结果。使用原始光谱进行分类的准确率高达约 97%。使用主成分分析(PCA)对样本的原始光谱进行预处理,并将预处理后的数据输入上述相同的监督机器学习分类器。准确率分别达到约 98% 和约 96%。在审查使用这两种不同类型光谱所产生的预测分类时,特别是审查与每个预测出处分类相关的置信度分数时,有可能解释投票分类器返回的错误出处分类。如果将通过每种光谱类型获得的预测出处和相关置信度分数与通过另一种光谱类型获得的出处预测和置信度分数进行比较,并只使用置信度分数较高的预测结果,分类准确率可达到 100%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Geofingerprinting of Coltan Using Handheld Spectroscopic Devices

Geofingerprinting of Coltan Using Handheld Spectroscopic Devices

Following the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010, specifically Sect. 1502, US companies have been required to report utilizing conflict minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The conflict mineral coltan, an ore consisting of elements tantalum and niobium, is central to this issue and engenders the need to track and trace the mineral’s supply chain. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) have been used, in combination with both unsupervised and supervised machine learning, to accurately classify coltan samples with known provenances. Sample spectra were first used as input data into unsupervised machine learning clustering algorithms, upon which dendrogram and constellation plots were generated. The classification achieved via unsupervised machine learning provided the proof of concept necessary to further investigate classification using supervised machine learning algorithms. The sample’s raw spectra were then used to train a supervised machine learning algorithm, consisting of a voting classifier relying on the results from random forest classifier (RFC), linear regression classifier (LRC), support vector classifier (SVC), and multi-layer perceptron classifier (MLPC). The classification achieved using raw spectra was able to achieve accuracies up to ~ 97%. The samples’ raw spectra were pre-processed using principal component analysis (PCA), and the pre-processed data was fed into the same supervised machine learning classifier described above. Accuracies of ~ 98% and ~ 96%, respectively, were achieved. When reviewing the predicted classifications arising from the use of these two different types of spectra, specifically reviewing the confidence score associated with each predicted provenance classification, it was possible to account for the incorrect provenance classifications returned by the voting classifier. If the predicted provenance and associated confidence score obtained via each spectra type was compared to the resulting provenance prediction and confidence score obtained by the other spectra type, and only the prediction with the higher associated confidence score was used, classification accuracies of 100% could be achieved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: The aim of this international peer-reviewed journal of the Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration (SME) is to provide a broad-based forum for the exchange of real-world and theoretical knowledge from academia, government and industry that is pertinent to mining, mineral/metallurgical processing, exploration and other fields served by the Society. The journal publishes high-quality original research publications, in-depth special review articles, reviews of state-of-the-art and innovative technologies and industry methodologies, communications of work of topical and emerging interest, and other works that enhance understanding on both the fundamental and practical levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信