现实旋转起爆发动机中爆炸传播的拉格朗日条件统计

IF 5.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Caleb Van Beck, Venkat Raman
{"title":"现实旋转起爆发动机中爆炸传播的拉格朗日条件统计","authors":"Caleb Van Beck, Venkat Raman","doi":"10.1016/j.proci.2024.105606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flow behavior was investigated in an RDE using Lagrangian Particle Tracking coupled with high-fidelity Eulerian simulations. The case considered utilized the AFRL Radial Air Inlet design under stoichiometric hydrogen–air conditions at a specified mass flow rate, with a single wave observed in the system. Particle properties were recorded throughout the simulation to compare to Eulerian data as well as to examine the effect of particle injection location on resulting flow behavior. The Lagrangian description of the flow closely resembled the Eulerian description in terms of capturing the detonation wave front properly, but axial velocities between the two descriptions varied significantly due to the moving particles increasing the average recorded velocities within the flow. Injection location was examined based on three conditions, namely starting injection locations 5° ahead of the detonation wave, 5° behind, and 180° ahead. Results showed differing behavior in the 180° condition, wherein a pressure rise was seen further axially into the chamber from detonation wave contact. Particle data was also viewed from a thermodynamic cycle standpoint and compared against an ideal detonative process from a reduced-order cycle deck model. Each injection condition studied failed to fully represent the ideal detonative process, despite showing similar overall trends between enthalpy and entropy, with the highest peak enthalpy coming within 23.75% of the ideal enthalpy in the 180° condition. Heat release behavior aided in understanding deflagrative losses incurred in certain injection conditions. An optimal injection location of 26° ahead of the wave was determined based on maximum pressure rise, which also failed to produce fully ideal thermodynamic behavior. Overall, this analysis shows the value of examining RDE flow from a Lagrangian perspective, given the insight it yields into how fluid interacts with flow structures inside complex RDE systems and how this translates to thermodynamic space for comparison to ideal behavior.","PeriodicalId":408,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Combustion Institute","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lagrangian-conditioned statistics of detonation propagation in a realistic rotating detonation engine\",\"authors\":\"Caleb Van Beck, Venkat Raman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.proci.2024.105606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Flow behavior was investigated in an RDE using Lagrangian Particle Tracking coupled with high-fidelity Eulerian simulations. The case considered utilized the AFRL Radial Air Inlet design under stoichiometric hydrogen–air conditions at a specified mass flow rate, with a single wave observed in the system. Particle properties were recorded throughout the simulation to compare to Eulerian data as well as to examine the effect of particle injection location on resulting flow behavior. The Lagrangian description of the flow closely resembled the Eulerian description in terms of capturing the detonation wave front properly, but axial velocities between the two descriptions varied significantly due to the moving particles increasing the average recorded velocities within the flow. Injection location was examined based on three conditions, namely starting injection locations 5° ahead of the detonation wave, 5° behind, and 180° ahead. Results showed differing behavior in the 180° condition, wherein a pressure rise was seen further axially into the chamber from detonation wave contact. Particle data was also viewed from a thermodynamic cycle standpoint and compared against an ideal detonative process from a reduced-order cycle deck model. Each injection condition studied failed to fully represent the ideal detonative process, despite showing similar overall trends between enthalpy and entropy, with the highest peak enthalpy coming within 23.75% of the ideal enthalpy in the 180° condition. Heat release behavior aided in understanding deflagrative losses incurred in certain injection conditions. An optimal injection location of 26° ahead of the wave was determined based on maximum pressure rise, which also failed to produce fully ideal thermodynamic behavior. Overall, this analysis shows the value of examining RDE flow from a Lagrangian perspective, given the insight it yields into how fluid interacts with flow structures inside complex RDE systems and how this translates to thermodynamic space for comparison to ideal behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Combustion Institute\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Combustion Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2024.105606\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Combustion Institute","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2024.105606","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用拉格朗日粒子跟踪和高保真欧拉模拟研究了 RDE 中的流动行为。所考虑的情况采用了 AFRL 径向进气口设计,在指定质量流量下的氢气-空气稳定条件下,系统中观察到单波。在整个模拟过程中记录了粒子特性,以便与欧拉数据进行比较,并检查粒子注入位置对流动行为的影响。流动的拉格朗日描述在正确捕捉爆炸波前沿方面与欧拉描述非常相似,但由于移动颗粒增加了流动中记录的平均速度,两种描述之间的轴向速度差异很大。根据三种条件研究了注入位置,即起爆波前方 5°、后方 5°和前方 180°的注入位置。结果表明,在 180° 条件下的行为有所不同,从爆轰波接触开始,压力会进一步向腔内轴向上升。粒子数据还从热力学循环的角度进行了分析,并与减阶循环甲板模型中的理想起爆过程进行了比较。尽管焓和熵之间的总体趋势相似,但所研究的每种注入条件都未能完全代表理想起爆过程,180° 条件下的最高焓峰值仅为理想焓峰值的 23.75%。放热行为有助于了解某些喷射条件下产生的爆燃损失。根据最大压力上升确定了波前 26° 的最佳喷射位置,但该位置也未能产生完全理想的热力学行为。总之,这项分析表明了从拉格朗日角度研究 RDE 流动的价值,因为它可以深入了解流体如何与复杂 RDE 系统内的流动结构相互作用,以及如何将其转化为热力学空间,以便与理想行为进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lagrangian-conditioned statistics of detonation propagation in a realistic rotating detonation engine
Flow behavior was investigated in an RDE using Lagrangian Particle Tracking coupled with high-fidelity Eulerian simulations. The case considered utilized the AFRL Radial Air Inlet design under stoichiometric hydrogen–air conditions at a specified mass flow rate, with a single wave observed in the system. Particle properties were recorded throughout the simulation to compare to Eulerian data as well as to examine the effect of particle injection location on resulting flow behavior. The Lagrangian description of the flow closely resembled the Eulerian description in terms of capturing the detonation wave front properly, but axial velocities between the two descriptions varied significantly due to the moving particles increasing the average recorded velocities within the flow. Injection location was examined based on three conditions, namely starting injection locations 5° ahead of the detonation wave, 5° behind, and 180° ahead. Results showed differing behavior in the 180° condition, wherein a pressure rise was seen further axially into the chamber from detonation wave contact. Particle data was also viewed from a thermodynamic cycle standpoint and compared against an ideal detonative process from a reduced-order cycle deck model. Each injection condition studied failed to fully represent the ideal detonative process, despite showing similar overall trends between enthalpy and entropy, with the highest peak enthalpy coming within 23.75% of the ideal enthalpy in the 180° condition. Heat release behavior aided in understanding deflagrative losses incurred in certain injection conditions. An optimal injection location of 26° ahead of the wave was determined based on maximum pressure rise, which also failed to produce fully ideal thermodynamic behavior. Overall, this analysis shows the value of examining RDE flow from a Lagrangian perspective, given the insight it yields into how fluid interacts with flow structures inside complex RDE systems and how this translates to thermodynamic space for comparison to ideal behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
420
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the Combustion Institute contains forefront contributions in fundamentals and applications of combustion science. For more than 50 years, the Combustion Institute has served as the peak international society for dissemination of scientific and technical research in the combustion field. In addition to author submissions, the Proceedings of the Combustion Institute includes the Institute''s prestigious invited strategic and topical reviews that represent indispensable resources for emergent research in the field. All papers are subjected to rigorous peer review. Research papers and invited topical reviews; Reaction Kinetics; Soot, PAH, and other large molecules; Diagnostics; Laminar Flames; Turbulent Flames; Heterogeneous Combustion; Spray and Droplet Combustion; Detonations, Explosions & Supersonic Combustion; Fire Research; Stationary Combustion Systems; IC Engine and Gas Turbine Combustion; New Technology Concepts The electronic version of Proceedings of the Combustion Institute contains supplemental material such as reaction mechanisms, illustrating movies, and other data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信