道格拉斯-格雷的《从芬戈洞穴到卡米洛特》(评论)

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
PARERGON Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1353/pgn.2024.a935353
Peter Whiteford
{"title":"道格拉斯-格雷的《从芬戈洞穴到卡米洛特》(评论)","authors":"Peter Whiteford","doi":"10.1353/pgn.2024.a935353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>From Fingal's Cave to Camelot</em> by Douglas Gray <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Peter Whiteford </li> </ul> Gray, Douglas, <em>From Fingal's Cave to Camelot</em>, edited by Jane Bliss, Oxford, Independent Publishing Network, 2020; paperback; pp. 252; R.R.P. £22.00; ISBN 9781838537838. <p>Douglas Gray, the author of <em>From Fingal's Cave to Camelot</em>, died in 2017. A brief death notice on the website of the Faculty of English, University of Oxford, rightly described him as 'a giant of his field' who continued to publish 'deep into <strong>[End Page 318]</strong> retirement'—and as this recent book indicates, Gray has continued to 'publish' not only in retirement but posthumously as well. One other affectionate remark from the death notice is worth quoting here too: 'Douglas had not only read everything but had seemingly remembered everything he had read'. Those familiar with his rooms in Norham Gardens, Oxford, might also reflect that he seemingly remembered where he had put everything, however much the state of the rooms suggested otherwise! I quote that second remark because it seems appropriate to the book under review, which is the product not just of a giant of a scholar but of someone who gives every appearance of having read and remembered everything. Equally, one suspects that the vast array of learning on display here is not the product of a search engine (how Google doth make scholars of us all) but of a lifetime's generous reading, a capacious memory, and an indefatigable interest in his subject. And how typical of Douglas (and typically Chaucerian) to describe himself in the Prologue as 'a simple practitioner of the history of medieval English literature' (p. 3).</p> <p>This work is anything but the product of a 'simple practitioner', as is immediately apparent. Ambitious in scope—in the best sense of that word—it is a wide-ranging and vastly learned exploration of its subject. The editor's preface speaks of intervening as little as possible in the extant text 'so as not to destroy the flow of Gray's argument' (p. ix), but in truth (and the quibble is only a minor one) this book does not really present an argument, and in some respects is the more attractive for not doing so.</p> <p>What it does do is set out for us in a section appropriately headed 'The Quest'. At first glance, Gray seems to make a modest claim, offering a 'selective and simple' account of 'the strange afterlife of medieval literature': a small contribution to a larger investigation (p. 3). Two images recur throughout this section—of story and of the journey—and it is those ideas, rather than an argument as such, that sit behind the book and its largely chronological narrative of the 'rediscovery' of medieval literature by succeeding generations of readers, writers, scholars, and critics—the servants, as Gray notes a little later, of Mercury and of Philology. A largely chronological narrative, but in a characteristic touch, Gray sidles up to his topic via Felix Mendelssohn's visit to Fingal's Cave on the island of Staffa, and Joseph Banks's visit to the same place some fifty years earlier.</p> <p>It marks a splendid starting point, for Banks is writing just a few years after James Macpherson published his 'translations'—<em>Fingal</em> in 1762 and <em>The Collected Works of Ossian</em> in 1765. The image of the careful scientist, Joseph Banks, responding with something approaching awe to a sublime natural marvel, and linking that natural phenomenon to the literary phenomenon engendered by Macpherson's much-disputed translations is somehow a wonderful emblem of the whole quest that Gray embarks on. Worth noting, too, from the Prologue, is the deliberate inclusiveness of the plural pronoun. While Gray may be the narrator or storyteller, we undertake the journey with him. We are all engaged in what is rapidly turned into 'our quest'. <strong>[End Page 319]</strong></p> <p>Something of the wide coverage of the topic might be noted (jestingly) through an inspection of the Index, which ranges from 'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres' to 'Zupitza, Julius'—a literal A–Z of Gray's subject. More seriously, though, the 'Index' does allow us to see some of the emphases of the quest, and...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":43576,"journal":{"name":"PARERGON","volume":"110 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Fingal's Cave to Camelot by Douglas Gray (review)\",\"authors\":\"Peter Whiteford\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/pgn.2024.a935353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>From Fingal's Cave to Camelot</em> by Douglas Gray <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Peter Whiteford </li> </ul> Gray, Douglas, <em>From Fingal's Cave to Camelot</em>, edited by Jane Bliss, Oxford, Independent Publishing Network, 2020; paperback; pp. 252; R.R.P. £22.00; ISBN 9781838537838. <p>Douglas Gray, the author of <em>From Fingal's Cave to Camelot</em>, died in 2017. A brief death notice on the website of the Faculty of English, University of Oxford, rightly described him as 'a giant of his field' who continued to publish 'deep into <strong>[End Page 318]</strong> retirement'—and as this recent book indicates, Gray has continued to 'publish' not only in retirement but posthumously as well. One other affectionate remark from the death notice is worth quoting here too: 'Douglas had not only read everything but had seemingly remembered everything he had read'. Those familiar with his rooms in Norham Gardens, Oxford, might also reflect that he seemingly remembered where he had put everything, however much the state of the rooms suggested otherwise! I quote that second remark because it seems appropriate to the book under review, which is the product not just of a giant of a scholar but of someone who gives every appearance of having read and remembered everything. Equally, one suspects that the vast array of learning on display here is not the product of a search engine (how Google doth make scholars of us all) but of a lifetime's generous reading, a capacious memory, and an indefatigable interest in his subject. And how typical of Douglas (and typically Chaucerian) to describe himself in the Prologue as 'a simple practitioner of the history of medieval English literature' (p. 3).</p> <p>This work is anything but the product of a 'simple practitioner', as is immediately apparent. Ambitious in scope—in the best sense of that word—it is a wide-ranging and vastly learned exploration of its subject. The editor's preface speaks of intervening as little as possible in the extant text 'so as not to destroy the flow of Gray's argument' (p. ix), but in truth (and the quibble is only a minor one) this book does not really present an argument, and in some respects is the more attractive for not doing so.</p> <p>What it does do is set out for us in a section appropriately headed 'The Quest'. At first glance, Gray seems to make a modest claim, offering a 'selective and simple' account of 'the strange afterlife of medieval literature': a small contribution to a larger investigation (p. 3). Two images recur throughout this section—of story and of the journey—and it is those ideas, rather than an argument as such, that sit behind the book and its largely chronological narrative of the 'rediscovery' of medieval literature by succeeding generations of readers, writers, scholars, and critics—the servants, as Gray notes a little later, of Mercury and of Philology. A largely chronological narrative, but in a characteristic touch, Gray sidles up to his topic via Felix Mendelssohn's visit to Fingal's Cave on the island of Staffa, and Joseph Banks's visit to the same place some fifty years earlier.</p> <p>It marks a splendid starting point, for Banks is writing just a few years after James Macpherson published his 'translations'—<em>Fingal</em> in 1762 and <em>The Collected Works of Ossian</em> in 1765. The image of the careful scientist, Joseph Banks, responding with something approaching awe to a sublime natural marvel, and linking that natural phenomenon to the literary phenomenon engendered by Macpherson's much-disputed translations is somehow a wonderful emblem of the whole quest that Gray embarks on. Worth noting, too, from the Prologue, is the deliberate inclusiveness of the plural pronoun. While Gray may be the narrator or storyteller, we undertake the journey with him. We are all engaged in what is rapidly turned into 'our quest'. <strong>[End Page 319]</strong></p> <p>Something of the wide coverage of the topic might be noted (jestingly) through an inspection of the Index, which ranges from 'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres' to 'Zupitza, Julius'—a literal A–Z of Gray's subject. More seriously, though, the 'Index' does allow us to see some of the emphases of the quest, and...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PARERGON\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PARERGON\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/pgn.2024.a935353\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PARERGON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pgn.2024.a935353","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 道格拉斯-格雷(Douglas Gray)著《从芬戈洞穴到卡美洛》(From Fingal's Cave to Camelot),彼得-怀特福德-格雷(Peter Whiteford Gray)、道格拉斯-格雷(Douglas)著,《从芬戈洞穴到卡美洛》(From Fingal's Cave to Camelot),简-布利斯(Jane Bliss)编,牛津,独立出版网,2020 年;平装本;第 252 页;零售价 22.00 英镑;国际标准书号 9781838537838。从芬格尔洞穴到卡美洛》的作者道格拉斯-格雷于 2017 年去世。牛津大学英语系网站上的一则简短讣告正确地将他描述为 "他所在领域的巨人",他 "退休后仍在继续发表作品"--正如这本新书所示,格雷不仅在退休后仍在继续 "发表作品",在死后也是如此。死亡通知中的另一句深情的话也值得在此引用:"道格拉斯不仅读过所有的书,而且似乎还记得他读过的所有书"。熟悉他在牛津诺哈姆花园的房间的人可能也会想到,他似乎记得他把所有东西都放在了哪里,不管房间的状况如何!我之所以引用第二句话,是因为它似乎很适合我们所评述的这本书,因为它不仅是一位学者巨匠的作品,也是一位看起来什么都读过、什么都记得的人的作品。同样,人们怀疑,这里所展示的大量知识并非搜索引擎的产物(谷歌是如何让我们所有人都成为学者的),而是毕生大量阅读、丰富记忆以及对其主题不懈兴趣的产物。道格拉斯在序言中将自己描述为 "中世纪英国文学史的简单实践者"(第 3 页),这是多么典型(也是典型的乔叟风格)。这部作品绝非 "简单的实践者 "所能完成,这一点一目了然。该书范围宏大,是对其主题的广泛而博学的探索。编者在序言中提到,"为了不破坏格雷论证的流畅性"(第 ix 页),尽可能少地对现存文本进行干预,但事实上(这只是一个小问题),本书并没有真正提出论证,而且在某些方面,不提出论证反而更有吸引力。本书在标题为 "探索 "的章节中为我们阐明了一切。乍一看,格雷似乎是在谦虚地宣称,他对 "中世纪文学的奇异来世 "进行了 "有选择性的、简单的 "描述:这只是对更大范围调查的一个小小的贡献(第 3 页)。在这一部分中,有两个形象反复出现--故事和旅程--正是这些思想,而不是论点本身,支撑着这本书,支撑着书中对后世读者、作家、学者和评论家对中世纪文学的 "重新发现 "的按时间顺序的叙述--正如格雷在稍后指出的那样,是墨丘利和文字学的仆人。这本书基本上是按时间顺序叙述的,但格雷以其独特的笔触,通过费利克斯-门德尔松对斯塔法岛上芬格尔洞穴的访问,以及约瑟夫-班克斯约五十年前对同一地点的访问,引出了他的主题。这是一个绝佳的起点,因为班克斯是在詹姆斯-麦克弗森(James Macpherson)出版其 "译著"--1762 年的《芬格尔》和 1765 年的《奥西安作品集》--几年后写作的。约瑟夫-班克斯这位细心的科学家以近乎敬畏的态度对崇高的自然奇观作出反应,并将这一自然现象与麦克弗森备受争议的译作所产生的文学现象联系起来,这一形象在某种程度上是格雷所进行的整个探索的绝妙象征。序言中值得注意的还有复数代词的有意包容性。格雷可能是叙述者或讲故事的人,而我们则与他一起踏上旅程。我们都参与了这场迅速演变为 "我们的探索 "的旅程。[从 "Académie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres "到 "Zupitza, Julius"--简直就是格雷主题的 "A-Z"。不过,更重要的是,"索引 "确实让我们看到了探寻的一些重点,以及...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Fingal's Cave to Camelot by Douglas Gray (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • From Fingal's Cave to Camelot by Douglas Gray
  • Peter Whiteford
Gray, Douglas, From Fingal's Cave to Camelot, edited by Jane Bliss, Oxford, Independent Publishing Network, 2020; paperback; pp. 252; R.R.P. £22.00; ISBN 9781838537838.

Douglas Gray, the author of From Fingal's Cave to Camelot, died in 2017. A brief death notice on the website of the Faculty of English, University of Oxford, rightly described him as 'a giant of his field' who continued to publish 'deep into [End Page 318] retirement'—and as this recent book indicates, Gray has continued to 'publish' not only in retirement but posthumously as well. One other affectionate remark from the death notice is worth quoting here too: 'Douglas had not only read everything but had seemingly remembered everything he had read'. Those familiar with his rooms in Norham Gardens, Oxford, might also reflect that he seemingly remembered where he had put everything, however much the state of the rooms suggested otherwise! I quote that second remark because it seems appropriate to the book under review, which is the product not just of a giant of a scholar but of someone who gives every appearance of having read and remembered everything. Equally, one suspects that the vast array of learning on display here is not the product of a search engine (how Google doth make scholars of us all) but of a lifetime's generous reading, a capacious memory, and an indefatigable interest in his subject. And how typical of Douglas (and typically Chaucerian) to describe himself in the Prologue as 'a simple practitioner of the history of medieval English literature' (p. 3).

This work is anything but the product of a 'simple practitioner', as is immediately apparent. Ambitious in scope—in the best sense of that word—it is a wide-ranging and vastly learned exploration of its subject. The editor's preface speaks of intervening as little as possible in the extant text 'so as not to destroy the flow of Gray's argument' (p. ix), but in truth (and the quibble is only a minor one) this book does not really present an argument, and in some respects is the more attractive for not doing so.

What it does do is set out for us in a section appropriately headed 'The Quest'. At first glance, Gray seems to make a modest claim, offering a 'selective and simple' account of 'the strange afterlife of medieval literature': a small contribution to a larger investigation (p. 3). Two images recur throughout this section—of story and of the journey—and it is those ideas, rather than an argument as such, that sit behind the book and its largely chronological narrative of the 'rediscovery' of medieval literature by succeeding generations of readers, writers, scholars, and critics—the servants, as Gray notes a little later, of Mercury and of Philology. A largely chronological narrative, but in a characteristic touch, Gray sidles up to his topic via Felix Mendelssohn's visit to Fingal's Cave on the island of Staffa, and Joseph Banks's visit to the same place some fifty years earlier.

It marks a splendid starting point, for Banks is writing just a few years after James Macpherson published his 'translations'—Fingal in 1762 and The Collected Works of Ossian in 1765. The image of the careful scientist, Joseph Banks, responding with something approaching awe to a sublime natural marvel, and linking that natural phenomenon to the literary phenomenon engendered by Macpherson's much-disputed translations is somehow a wonderful emblem of the whole quest that Gray embarks on. Worth noting, too, from the Prologue, is the deliberate inclusiveness of the plural pronoun. While Gray may be the narrator or storyteller, we undertake the journey with him. We are all engaged in what is rapidly turned into 'our quest'. [End Page 319]

Something of the wide coverage of the topic might be noted (jestingly) through an inspection of the Index, which ranges from 'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres' to 'Zupitza, Julius'—a literal A–Z of Gray's subject. More seriously, though, the 'Index' does allow us to see some of the emphases of the quest, and...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PARERGON
PARERGON MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Parergon publishes articles and book reviews on all aspects of medieval and early modern studies. It has a particular focus on research which takes new approaches and crosses traditional disciplinary boundaries. Fully refereed and with an international Advisory Board, Parergon is the Southern Hemisphere"s leading journal for early European research. It is published by the Australian and New Zealand Association of Medieval and Early Modern Studies (Inc.) and has close links with the ARC Network for Early European Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信