共同机构所有权与公司杠杆操纵

IF 4 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Bin Dai, Shiyao Min, Qiqi Wu
{"title":"共同机构所有权与公司杠杆操纵","authors":"Bin Dai, Shiyao Min, Qiqi Wu","doi":"10.1007/s13132-024-02229-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> “Deleveraging” is a key starting point for preventing and resolving major risks, especially financial risks. This paper studies the impact of common institutional ownership on corporate deleveraging behavior from the perspective of leverage manipulation. The study shows that common institutional ownership can significantly inhibit corporate leverage manipulation and that managerial myopia and internal control quality play negative and positive moderating roles in the above relationship, and its mechanism is mainly to alleviate the degree of financing constraints, reduce the degree of information asymmetry, and then play the governance efficacy of common institutional ownership. It is further found that the governance effect of common ownership is more significant in the sample of firms after the implementation of the “deleveraging” policy, in the sample of non-state-owned firms, in the sample of firms without directors’ liability insurance, and in the sample of firms with weaker managerial competence. The economic consequence test shows that common institutional ownership improves investment efficiency and reduces risk-taking by constraining leverage manipulation. This paper explores the impact of this emerging form of ownership on corporate governance and corporate leverage manipulation from the perspective of institutional common ownership, which is of great practical value in promoting the sound development of the capital market.</p>","PeriodicalId":47435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Common Institutional Ownership and Corporate Leverage Manipulation\",\"authors\":\"Bin Dai, Shiyao Min, Qiqi Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13132-024-02229-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p> “Deleveraging” is a key starting point for preventing and resolving major risks, especially financial risks. This paper studies the impact of common institutional ownership on corporate deleveraging behavior from the perspective of leverage manipulation. The study shows that common institutional ownership can significantly inhibit corporate leverage manipulation and that managerial myopia and internal control quality play negative and positive moderating roles in the above relationship, and its mechanism is mainly to alleviate the degree of financing constraints, reduce the degree of information asymmetry, and then play the governance efficacy of common institutional ownership. It is further found that the governance effect of common ownership is more significant in the sample of firms after the implementation of the “deleveraging” policy, in the sample of non-state-owned firms, in the sample of firms without directors’ liability insurance, and in the sample of firms with weaker managerial competence. The economic consequence test shows that common institutional ownership improves investment efficiency and reduces risk-taking by constraining leverage manipulation. This paper explores the impact of this emerging form of ownership on corporate governance and corporate leverage manipulation from the perspective of institutional common ownership, which is of great practical value in promoting the sound development of the capital market.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Knowledge Economy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Knowledge Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02229-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02229-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

"去杠杆 "是防范化解重大风险特别是金融风险的重要抓手。本文从杠杆操纵的角度研究了共同机构所有权对企业去杠杆行为的影响。研究表明,共同机构所有权能够显著抑制企业杠杆操纵,管理近视和内部控制质量在上述关系中分别起到负向和正向的调节作用,其作用机制主要是缓解融资约束程度、降低信息不对称程度,进而发挥共同机构所有权的治理功效。研究进一步发现,在 "去杠杆 "政策实施后的企业样本、非国有企业样本、未购买董事责任保险的企业样本以及管理能力较弱的企业样本中,共同制度所有权的治理效应更为显著。经济后果检验表明,共同机构所有权通过限制杠杆操纵提高了投资效率,降低了风险承担。本文从机构共同所有权的角度探讨了这种新兴所有权形式对公司治理和公司杠杆操纵的影响,对促进资本市场的健康发展具有重要的现实价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Common Institutional Ownership and Corporate Leverage Manipulation

“Deleveraging” is a key starting point for preventing and resolving major risks, especially financial risks. This paper studies the impact of common institutional ownership on corporate deleveraging behavior from the perspective of leverage manipulation. The study shows that common institutional ownership can significantly inhibit corporate leverage manipulation and that managerial myopia and internal control quality play negative and positive moderating roles in the above relationship, and its mechanism is mainly to alleviate the degree of financing constraints, reduce the degree of information asymmetry, and then play the governance efficacy of common institutional ownership. It is further found that the governance effect of common ownership is more significant in the sample of firms after the implementation of the “deleveraging” policy, in the sample of non-state-owned firms, in the sample of firms without directors’ liability insurance, and in the sample of firms with weaker managerial competence. The economic consequence test shows that common institutional ownership improves investment efficiency and reduces risk-taking by constraining leverage manipulation. This paper explores the impact of this emerging form of ownership on corporate governance and corporate leverage manipulation from the perspective of institutional common ownership, which is of great practical value in promoting the sound development of the capital market.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
27.30%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: In the context of rapid globalization and technological capacity, the world’s economies today are driven increasingly by knowledge—the expertise, skills, experience, education, understanding, awareness, perception, and other qualities required to communicate, interpret, and analyze information. New wealth is created by the application of knowledge to improve productivity—and to create new products, services, systems, and process (i.e., to innovate). The Journal of the Knowledge Economy focuses on the dynamics of the knowledge-based economy, with an emphasis on the role of knowledge creation, diffusion, and application across three economic levels: (1) the systemic ''meta'' or ''macro''-level, (2) the organizational ''meso''-level, and (3) the individual ''micro''-level. The journal incorporates insights from the fields of economics, management, law, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and political science to shed new light on the evolving role of knowledge, with a particular emphasis on how innovation can be leveraged to provide solutions to complex problems and issues, including global crises in environmental sustainability, education, and economic development. Articles emphasize empirical studies, underscoring a comparative approach, and, to a lesser extent, case studies and theoretical articles. The journal balances practice/application and theory/concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信