Cosmas Bernard Meka’a, Astride Claudel Njiepue Nouffeussie, Fabrice Nzepang
{"title":"信息和传播技术对劳动生产率的影响:通过喀麦隆企业联合使用信息和传播技术工具的棱镜重新审视索洛悖论","authors":"Cosmas Bernard Meka’a, Astride Claudel Njiepue Nouffeussie, Fabrice Nzepang","doi":"10.1007/s13132-024-02241-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper re-examines Solow’s productivity paradox through the prism of the joint use of ICT tools. On the one hand, the joint use of ICT tools implies heterogeneous, hierarchical, and complementary skills and, on the other hand, constitutes a larger consumption network. This study uses data from the enterprise survey conducted by the World Bank on a representative sample of 361 Cameroonian firms to re-examine this productivity paradox. These data have the advantage of providing information on the characteristics and productivity of firms, as well as on the different types of ICT used. Methodologically, the study uses a Tobit model with instrumental variables to take account of ICT endogeneity problems and the truncated, censored nature of our productivity measure. The main results suggest that (i) the use of a single ICT tool (mobile money, website, or email) has a positive but insignificant effect on worker productivity; (ii) the use of two or more of these tools (email-mobile money, email-website, mobile money-email-website) positively and significantly affects worker productivity, by 5.881, 6.189, and 8.881 points, respectively; (iii) company size, sector of activity, and previous productivity positively and significantly affect labor productivity. This study argues in favor of the joint use of ICT tools requiring different, complementary, and prioritized skills in order to significantly increase productivity. Specifically, it is in the interests of large companies and companies in the industrial and service sectors to mobilize several ICT tools requiring complementary skills.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":47435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of ICTs on Labor Productivity: A Re-examination of Solow’s Paradox Through the Prism of the Joint Use of ICT Tools in Cameroonian Firms\",\"authors\":\"Cosmas Bernard Meka’a, Astride Claudel Njiepue Nouffeussie, Fabrice Nzepang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13132-024-02241-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper re-examines Solow’s productivity paradox through the prism of the joint use of ICT tools. On the one hand, the joint use of ICT tools implies heterogeneous, hierarchical, and complementary skills and, on the other hand, constitutes a larger consumption network. This study uses data from the enterprise survey conducted by the World Bank on a representative sample of 361 Cameroonian firms to re-examine this productivity paradox. These data have the advantage of providing information on the characteristics and productivity of firms, as well as on the different types of ICT used. Methodologically, the study uses a Tobit model with instrumental variables to take account of ICT endogeneity problems and the truncated, censored nature of our productivity measure. The main results suggest that (i) the use of a single ICT tool (mobile money, website, or email) has a positive but insignificant effect on worker productivity; (ii) the use of two or more of these tools (email-mobile money, email-website, mobile money-email-website) positively and significantly affects worker productivity, by 5.881, 6.189, and 8.881 points, respectively; (iii) company size, sector of activity, and previous productivity positively and significantly affect labor productivity. This study argues in favor of the joint use of ICT tools requiring different, complementary, and prioritized skills in order to significantly increase productivity. Specifically, it is in the interests of large companies and companies in the industrial and service sectors to mobilize several ICT tools requiring complementary skills.\\n</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Knowledge Economy\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Knowledge Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02241-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02241-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of ICTs on Labor Productivity: A Re-examination of Solow’s Paradox Through the Prism of the Joint Use of ICT Tools in Cameroonian Firms
This paper re-examines Solow’s productivity paradox through the prism of the joint use of ICT tools. On the one hand, the joint use of ICT tools implies heterogeneous, hierarchical, and complementary skills and, on the other hand, constitutes a larger consumption network. This study uses data from the enterprise survey conducted by the World Bank on a representative sample of 361 Cameroonian firms to re-examine this productivity paradox. These data have the advantage of providing information on the characteristics and productivity of firms, as well as on the different types of ICT used. Methodologically, the study uses a Tobit model with instrumental variables to take account of ICT endogeneity problems and the truncated, censored nature of our productivity measure. The main results suggest that (i) the use of a single ICT tool (mobile money, website, or email) has a positive but insignificant effect on worker productivity; (ii) the use of two or more of these tools (email-mobile money, email-website, mobile money-email-website) positively and significantly affects worker productivity, by 5.881, 6.189, and 8.881 points, respectively; (iii) company size, sector of activity, and previous productivity positively and significantly affect labor productivity. This study argues in favor of the joint use of ICT tools requiring different, complementary, and prioritized skills in order to significantly increase productivity. Specifically, it is in the interests of large companies and companies in the industrial and service sectors to mobilize several ICT tools requiring complementary skills.
期刊介绍:
In the context of rapid globalization and technological capacity, the world’s economies today are driven increasingly by knowledge—the expertise, skills, experience, education, understanding, awareness, perception, and other qualities required to communicate, interpret, and analyze information. New wealth is created by the application of knowledge to improve productivity—and to create new products, services, systems, and process (i.e., to innovate). The Journal of the Knowledge Economy focuses on the dynamics of the knowledge-based economy, with an emphasis on the role of knowledge creation, diffusion, and application across three economic levels: (1) the systemic ''meta'' or ''macro''-level, (2) the organizational ''meso''-level, and (3) the individual ''micro''-level. The journal incorporates insights from the fields of economics, management, law, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and political science to shed new light on the evolving role of knowledge, with a particular emphasis on how innovation can be leveraged to provide solutions to complex problems and issues, including global crises in environmental sustainability, education, and economic development. Articles emphasize empirical studies, underscoring a comparative approach, and, to a lesser extent, case studies and theoretical articles. The journal balances practice/application and theory/concepts.