从废物到资源:不同温度下污水污泥热化学处理效率的多维分析

IF 3.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Shiqi Liu, Guoxia Wei, Hanqiao Liu, Yuwen Zhu, Huizhen Shi and Yi Lian
{"title":"从废物到资源:不同温度下污水污泥热化学处理效率的多维分析","authors":"Shiqi Liu, Guoxia Wei, Hanqiao Liu, Yuwen Zhu, Huizhen Shi and Yi Lian","doi":"10.1039/D4EW00255E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Sewage sludge (SS) thermochemical treatment is considered as an effective management scheme in the transition to low carbon and sustainable development from conventional SS treatment. According to temperature and atmosphere, SS thermochemical treatment technologies are primarily categorized into thermal hydrolysis (TH), medium-temperature pyrolysis carbonization (MPC), high-temperature pyrolysis carbonization, gasification incineration, and incineration. Herein, the life cycle assessment (LCA), energy efficiency analysis (EEA), and cost–benefit analysis (CBA) methods were used to examine the environmental, energy, and economic performances of the five different SS thermochemical technologies. The LCA results indicate that MPC is environmentally favorable, with incineration being the most impactful in terms of environmental burden, MPC has a global warming potential (GWP) index of 163.63 kg CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> eq., significantly lower than the 306.37 kg CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> eq. impact generated by incineration. The EEA results show that the energy recovery rate increases with the temperature of thermochemical treatment. Economically, MPC has the best economic benefits, the CBA and environmental-CBA results are 97.39 and 87.17 RMB per tonne, respectively. Ultimately, scenario analyses illustrate that technological improvements by adding inorganic–organic separation pretreatment before MPC are beneficial to the reduction of environmental indicator values, especially by up to 42.48–44.21% in terms of ecological and human health hazards, with an additional economic benefit of 10.22%.</p>","PeriodicalId":75,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","volume":" 12","pages":" 3238-3248"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From waste to resource: a multidimensional analysis of sewage sludge thermochemical treatment efficiency across temperatures†\",\"authors\":\"Shiqi Liu, Guoxia Wei, Hanqiao Liu, Yuwen Zhu, Huizhen Shi and Yi Lian\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4EW00255E\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Sewage sludge (SS) thermochemical treatment is considered as an effective management scheme in the transition to low carbon and sustainable development from conventional SS treatment. According to temperature and atmosphere, SS thermochemical treatment technologies are primarily categorized into thermal hydrolysis (TH), medium-temperature pyrolysis carbonization (MPC), high-temperature pyrolysis carbonization, gasification incineration, and incineration. Herein, the life cycle assessment (LCA), energy efficiency analysis (EEA), and cost–benefit analysis (CBA) methods were used to examine the environmental, energy, and economic performances of the five different SS thermochemical technologies. The LCA results indicate that MPC is environmentally favorable, with incineration being the most impactful in terms of environmental burden, MPC has a global warming potential (GWP) index of 163.63 kg CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> eq., significantly lower than the 306.37 kg CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> eq. impact generated by incineration. The EEA results show that the energy recovery rate increases with the temperature of thermochemical treatment. Economically, MPC has the best economic benefits, the CBA and environmental-CBA results are 97.39 and 87.17 RMB per tonne, respectively. Ultimately, scenario analyses illustrate that technological improvements by adding inorganic–organic separation pretreatment before MPC are beneficial to the reduction of environmental indicator values, especially by up to 42.48–44.21% in terms of ecological and human health hazards, with an additional economic benefit of 10.22%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology\",\"volume\":\" 12\",\"pages\":\" 3238-3248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ew/d4ew00255e\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ew/d4ew00255e","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

污水污泥(SS)热化学处理被认为是从传统 SS 处理向低碳和可持续发展过渡的有效管理方案。根据温度和气氛的不同,污泥热化学处理技术主要分为热水解(TH)、中温热解碳化(MPC)、高温热解碳化、气化焚烧和焚烧。本文采用生命周期评估(LCA)、能效分析(EEA)和成本效益分析(CBA)方法考察了五种不同 SS 热化学技术在环境、能源和经济方面的表现。生命周期分析结果表明,MPC 对环境有利,就环境负担而言,焚烧对环境的影响最大,MPC 的全球升温潜能值(GWP)指数为 163.63 千克二氧化碳当量,明显低于焚烧产生的 306.37 千克二氧化碳当量的影响。EEA 结果表明,能量回收率随热化学处理温度的升高而增加。在经济上,MPC 的经济效益最好,CBA 和环境-CBA 结果分别为每吨 97.39 元和 87.17 元。最终,情景分析表明,在 MPC 之前增加无机-有机分离预处理的技术改进有利于降低环境指标值,特别是在生态和人体健康危害方面,降低幅度可达 42.48%-44.21% ,额外经济效益为 10.22%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

From waste to resource: a multidimensional analysis of sewage sludge thermochemical treatment efficiency across temperatures†

From waste to resource: a multidimensional analysis of sewage sludge thermochemical treatment efficiency across temperatures†

Sewage sludge (SS) thermochemical treatment is considered as an effective management scheme in the transition to low carbon and sustainable development from conventional SS treatment. According to temperature and atmosphere, SS thermochemical treatment technologies are primarily categorized into thermal hydrolysis (TH), medium-temperature pyrolysis carbonization (MPC), high-temperature pyrolysis carbonization, gasification incineration, and incineration. Herein, the life cycle assessment (LCA), energy efficiency analysis (EEA), and cost–benefit analysis (CBA) methods were used to examine the environmental, energy, and economic performances of the five different SS thermochemical technologies. The LCA results indicate that MPC is environmentally favorable, with incineration being the most impactful in terms of environmental burden, MPC has a global warming potential (GWP) index of 163.63 kg CO2 eq., significantly lower than the 306.37 kg CO2 eq. impact generated by incineration. The EEA results show that the energy recovery rate increases with the temperature of thermochemical treatment. Economically, MPC has the best economic benefits, the CBA and environmental-CBA results are 97.39 and 87.17 RMB per tonne, respectively. Ultimately, scenario analyses illustrate that technological improvements by adding inorganic–organic separation pretreatment before MPC are beneficial to the reduction of environmental indicator values, especially by up to 42.48–44.21% in terms of ecological and human health hazards, with an additional economic benefit of 10.22%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL SC-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
206
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology seeks to showcase high quality research about fundamental science, innovative technologies, and management practices that promote sustainable water.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信