康德《自然史通论》和《天国论》中 "火宝 "和 "自然之凤 "两种说法的两个证明

IF 0.9 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Martin Walter
{"title":"康德《自然史通论》和《天国论》中 \"火宝 \"和 \"自然之凤 \"两种说法的两个证明","authors":"Martin Walter","doi":"10.1515/kant-2024-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kant uses two metaphors in his early works on cosmogony: “Fire Treasures” and his famous figure of a “Phoenix of Nature”. This study suggests two sources Kant may have known. The first metaphor, goes back to the German translation of Leibniz’s <jats:italic>Protogaea</jats:italic> (1749) or a review of the <jats:italic>Protogaea</jats:italic> by Gottsched. Both appeared in the same year as the Latin text. Kant receipts the second metaphor most likely from the English poet Abraham Cowley (his poem: “The Extasie”). Both metaphors are significant because they explain and illustrate Kant’s recourse to the Stoic doctrine of <jats:italic>ekpyrosis</jats:italic>, i. e. the passing away through a world-fire and the renewal of the cosmos from the elementary particles created in this holocaustic process.","PeriodicalId":45952,"journal":{"name":"KANT-STUDIEN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zwei Nachweise der beiden Ausdrücke „Feuerschätze“ und „Phönix der Natur“ in Kants Allgemeiner Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels\",\"authors\":\"Martin Walter\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/kant-2024-2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Kant uses two metaphors in his early works on cosmogony: “Fire Treasures” and his famous figure of a “Phoenix of Nature”. This study suggests two sources Kant may have known. The first metaphor, goes back to the German translation of Leibniz’s <jats:italic>Protogaea</jats:italic> (1749) or a review of the <jats:italic>Protogaea</jats:italic> by Gottsched. Both appeared in the same year as the Latin text. Kant receipts the second metaphor most likely from the English poet Abraham Cowley (his poem: “The Extasie”). Both metaphors are significant because they explain and illustrate Kant’s recourse to the Stoic doctrine of <jats:italic>ekpyrosis</jats:italic>, i. e. the passing away through a world-fire and the renewal of the cosmos from the elementary particles created in this holocaustic process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KANT-STUDIEN\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KANT-STUDIEN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2024-2022\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KANT-STUDIEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2024-2022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

康德在其早期的宇宙论著作中使用了两个隐喻:"火宝 "和他著名的 "自然凤凰 "形象。本研究提出了康德可能知道的两个来源。第一个隐喻可以追溯到莱布尼茨《原论》的德文译本(1749 年)或哥特施特对《原论》的评论。两者都与拉丁文本同年出版。康德很可能是从英国诗人亚伯拉罕-考利(Abraham Cowley)(他的诗歌:"The Extasie")那里获得第二个隐喻的。这两个隐喻都很重要,因为它们解释并说明了康德诉诸斯多葛学派的 "毁灭"(ekpyrosis)学说,即通过世界之火消逝,并通过在这一整体燃烧过程中产生的基本粒子更新宇宙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Zwei Nachweise der beiden Ausdrücke „Feuerschätze“ und „Phönix der Natur“ in Kants Allgemeiner Naturgeschichte und Theorie des Himmels
Kant uses two metaphors in his early works on cosmogony: “Fire Treasures” and his famous figure of a “Phoenix of Nature”. This study suggests two sources Kant may have known. The first metaphor, goes back to the German translation of Leibniz’s Protogaea (1749) or a review of the Protogaea by Gottsched. Both appeared in the same year as the Latin text. Kant receipts the second metaphor most likely from the English poet Abraham Cowley (his poem: “The Extasie”). Both metaphors are significant because they explain and illustrate Kant’s recourse to the Stoic doctrine of ekpyrosis, i. e. the passing away through a world-fire and the renewal of the cosmos from the elementary particles created in this holocaustic process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
KANT-STUDIEN
KANT-STUDIEN PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Publications in the Kant-Studien have a dual focus: firstly contributions to the interpretation, history and editorial questions of Kant"s philosophy, and secondly systematic debates on transcendental philosophy. In addition, there are investigations on Kant"s precursors and on the effects of his philosophy. The journal also contains a documentation section, in which the current state of research is indicated by means of a continually updated bibliography with reviews and references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信