{"title":"使用 CeO2-supported Ni 和 Ru 催化剂层的性能增强型直接氨质子陶瓷燃料电池","authors":"Xiaoxiao Li, Jiangping Chen, Yunyun Huang, Huihuang Fang, Chongqi Chen, Fulan Zhong, Li Lin, Yu Luo, Yuqing Wang, Lilong Jiang","doi":"10.1007/s11708-024-0959-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ammonia is an exceptional fuel for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs), because of the high content of hydrogen and the advantages of carbon neutrality. However, the challenge lies in its unsatisfactory performance at intermediate temperatures (500–600 °C), impeding its advancement. An electrolyte-supported proton-ceramic fuel cell (PCFC) was fabricated employing BaZr<sub>0.1</sub>Ce<sub>0.7</sub>Y<sub>0.2</sub>O<sub>3−δ</sub> (BZCY) as the electrolyte and Ba<sub>0.5</sub>Sr<sub>0.5</sub>Co<sub>0.8</sub>Fe<sub>0.2</sub>O<sub>3−δ</sub> (BSCF) as the cathode. In this study, the performance of PCFC using NH<sub>3</sub> as fuel within an operating temperature range of 500–700 °C was improved by adding an M(Ni,Ru)/CeO<sub>2</sub> catalyst layer to reconstruct the anode surface. The electrochemical performance of direct ammonia PCFC (DA-PCFC) were improved to different extents. Compared to H<sub>2</sub> as fuel, the degradation ratio of peak power densities (PPDs) of Ni/CeO<sub>2</sub>-loaded PCFC fueled with NH<sub>3</sub> decreased at 700–500 °C, with a decrease to 13.3% at 700 °C and 30.7% at 500 °C. The findings indicate that Ru-based catalysts have a greater promise for direct ammonia SOFCs (DA-SOFCs) at operating temperatures below 600 °C. However, the enhancement effect becomes less significant above 600 °C when compared to Ni-based catalysts.</p>","PeriodicalId":570,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Energy","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance-enhanced direct ammonia protonic ceramic fuel cells using CeO2-supported Ni and Ru catalyst layer\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxiao Li, Jiangping Chen, Yunyun Huang, Huihuang Fang, Chongqi Chen, Fulan Zhong, Li Lin, Yu Luo, Yuqing Wang, Lilong Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11708-024-0959-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Ammonia is an exceptional fuel for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs), because of the high content of hydrogen and the advantages of carbon neutrality. However, the challenge lies in its unsatisfactory performance at intermediate temperatures (500–600 °C), impeding its advancement. An electrolyte-supported proton-ceramic fuel cell (PCFC) was fabricated employing BaZr<sub>0.1</sub>Ce<sub>0.7</sub>Y<sub>0.2</sub>O<sub>3−δ</sub> (BZCY) as the electrolyte and Ba<sub>0.5</sub>Sr<sub>0.5</sub>Co<sub>0.8</sub>Fe<sub>0.2</sub>O<sub>3−δ</sub> (BSCF) as the cathode. In this study, the performance of PCFC using NH<sub>3</sub> as fuel within an operating temperature range of 500–700 °C was improved by adding an M(Ni,Ru)/CeO<sub>2</sub> catalyst layer to reconstruct the anode surface. The electrochemical performance of direct ammonia PCFC (DA-PCFC) were improved to different extents. Compared to H<sub>2</sub> as fuel, the degradation ratio of peak power densities (PPDs) of Ni/CeO<sub>2</sub>-loaded PCFC fueled with NH<sub>3</sub> decreased at 700–500 °C, with a decrease to 13.3% at 700 °C and 30.7% at 500 °C. The findings indicate that Ru-based catalysts have a greater promise for direct ammonia SOFCs (DA-SOFCs) at operating temperatures below 600 °C. However, the enhancement effect becomes less significant above 600 °C when compared to Ni-based catalysts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Energy\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-024-0959-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-024-0959-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance-enhanced direct ammonia protonic ceramic fuel cells using CeO2-supported Ni and Ru catalyst layer
Ammonia is an exceptional fuel for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs), because of the high content of hydrogen and the advantages of carbon neutrality. However, the challenge lies in its unsatisfactory performance at intermediate temperatures (500–600 °C), impeding its advancement. An electrolyte-supported proton-ceramic fuel cell (PCFC) was fabricated employing BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2O3−δ (BZCY) as the electrolyte and Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ (BSCF) as the cathode. In this study, the performance of PCFC using NH3 as fuel within an operating temperature range of 500–700 °C was improved by adding an M(Ni,Ru)/CeO2 catalyst layer to reconstruct the anode surface. The electrochemical performance of direct ammonia PCFC (DA-PCFC) were improved to different extents. Compared to H2 as fuel, the degradation ratio of peak power densities (PPDs) of Ni/CeO2-loaded PCFC fueled with NH3 decreased at 700–500 °C, with a decrease to 13.3% at 700 °C and 30.7% at 500 °C. The findings indicate that Ru-based catalysts have a greater promise for direct ammonia SOFCs (DA-SOFCs) at operating temperatures below 600 °C. However, the enhancement effect becomes less significant above 600 °C when compared to Ni-based catalysts.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Energy, an interdisciplinary and peer-reviewed international journal launched in January 2007, seeks to provide a rapid and unique platform for reporting the most advanced research on energy technology and strategic thinking in order to promote timely communication between researchers, scientists, engineers, and policy makers in the field of energy.
Frontiers in Energy aims to be a leading peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information for analyses, reviews and evaluations in energy engineering and research, with a strong focus on energy analysis, energy modelling and prediction, integrated energy systems, energy conversion and conservation, energy planning and energy on economic and policy issues.
Frontiers in Energy publishes state-of-the-art review articles, original research papers and short communications by individual researchers or research groups. It is strictly peer-reviewed and accepts only original submissions in English. The scope of the journal is broad and covers all latest focus in current energy research.
High-quality papers are solicited in, but are not limited to the following areas:
-Fundamental energy science
-Energy technology, including energy generation, conversion, storage, renewables, transport, urban design and building efficiency
-Energy and the environment, including pollution control, energy efficiency and climate change
-Energy economics, strategy and policy
-Emerging energy issue