Paul K Whelton,Samantha O'Connell,Katherine T Mills,Jiang He
{"title":"最佳抗高血压收缩压:系统综述与元分析》。","authors":"Paul K Whelton,Samantha O'Connell,Katherine T Mills,Jiang He","doi":"10.1161/hypertensionaha.124.23597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nSystolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering reduces major cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality. However, the optimal target for SBP lowering remains controversial.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe included trials with random allocation to an SBP <130 mm Hg treatment target and CVD as the primary outcome. Data were extracted from each study independently and in duplicate using a standardized protocol. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for CVD and all-cause mortality comparing SBP <130 and ≥130 mm Hg treatment targets. A secondary analysis compared the same outcomes for randomization to an SBP target of <120 or <140 mm Hg.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nSeven trials, including 72 138 participants, met the eligibility criteria. Compared with an SBP target of ≥130 mm Hg, an SBP target of <130 mm Hg significantly reduced major CVD (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.70-0.87]) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.79-0.99]). Compared with an SBP target of <140 mm Hg, an intensive SBP target of <120 mm Hg significantly reduced major CVD (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.74-0.91]), but all-cause mortality was marginally insignificant (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.71-1.01]). Adverse events were significantly more likely in the intensive SBP target groups, but the absolute risks were low.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis study suggests targeting an SBP <130 mm Hg significantly reduces the risks of major CVD and all-cause mortality. The findings also support an SBP target of <120 mm Hg, based on a smaller number of trials.\r\n\r\nREGISTRATION\r\nURL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD42023490693.","PeriodicalId":13042,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Antihypertensive Systolic Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Paul K Whelton,Samantha O'Connell,Katherine T Mills,Jiang He\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/hypertensionaha.124.23597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nSystolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering reduces major cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality. However, the optimal target for SBP lowering remains controversial.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe included trials with random allocation to an SBP <130 mm Hg treatment target and CVD as the primary outcome. Data were extracted from each study independently and in duplicate using a standardized protocol. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for CVD and all-cause mortality comparing SBP <130 and ≥130 mm Hg treatment targets. A secondary analysis compared the same outcomes for randomization to an SBP target of <120 or <140 mm Hg.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nSeven trials, including 72 138 participants, met the eligibility criteria. Compared with an SBP target of ≥130 mm Hg, an SBP target of <130 mm Hg significantly reduced major CVD (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.70-0.87]) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.79-0.99]). Compared with an SBP target of <140 mm Hg, an intensive SBP target of <120 mm Hg significantly reduced major CVD (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.74-0.91]), but all-cause mortality was marginally insignificant (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.71-1.01]). Adverse events were significantly more likely in the intensive SBP target groups, but the absolute risks were low.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nThis study suggests targeting an SBP <130 mm Hg significantly reduces the risks of major CVD and all-cause mortality. The findings also support an SBP target of <120 mm Hg, based on a smaller number of trials.\\r\\n\\r\\nREGISTRATION\\r\\nURL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD42023490693.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.124.23597\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.124.23597","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景降低收缩压(SBP)可减少主要心血管疾病(CVD)和全因死亡率。方法我们纳入了随机分配 SBP <130 mm Hg 治疗目标和以心血管疾病为主要结局的试验。采用标准化方案从每项研究中独立提取数据,一式两份。通过随机效应荟萃分析,得出了对比 SBP <130 mm Hg 和 ≥130 mm Hg 治疗目标的心血管疾病和全因死亡率的危险比 (HRs) 和 95% CIs。一项二次分析比较了随机设定 SBP 目标值为 <120 或 <140 mm Hg 时的相同结果。与 SBP 目标值≥130 mm Hg 相比,SBP 目标值<130 mm Hg 可显著降低主要心血管疾病(HR,0.78 [95% CI,0.70-0.87])和全因死亡率(HR,0.89 [95% CI,0.79-0.99])。与 SBP 小于 140 mm Hg 的目标值相比,SBP 小于 120 mm Hg 的强化目标值可显著降低主要心血管疾病的发生率(HR,0.82 [95% CI,0.74-0.91]),但全因死亡率略微不显著(HR,0.85 [95% CI,0.71-1.01])。本研究表明,SBP <130 mm Hg 可显著降低主要心血管疾病和全因死亡的风险。基于较少的试验,研究结果还支持将 SBP 目标值定为 <120 mm Hg。REGISTRATIONURL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier:CRD42023490693。
Optimal Antihypertensive Systolic Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
BACKGROUND
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering reduces major cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality. However, the optimal target for SBP lowering remains controversial.
METHODS
We included trials with random allocation to an SBP <130 mm Hg treatment target and CVD as the primary outcome. Data were extracted from each study independently and in duplicate using a standardized protocol. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for CVD and all-cause mortality comparing SBP <130 and ≥130 mm Hg treatment targets. A secondary analysis compared the same outcomes for randomization to an SBP target of <120 or <140 mm Hg.
RESULTS
Seven trials, including 72 138 participants, met the eligibility criteria. Compared with an SBP target of ≥130 mm Hg, an SBP target of <130 mm Hg significantly reduced major CVD (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.70-0.87]) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.79-0.99]). Compared with an SBP target of <140 mm Hg, an intensive SBP target of <120 mm Hg significantly reduced major CVD (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.74-0.91]), but all-cause mortality was marginally insignificant (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.71-1.01]). Adverse events were significantly more likely in the intensive SBP target groups, but the absolute risks were low.
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests targeting an SBP <130 mm Hg significantly reduces the risks of major CVD and all-cause mortality. The findings also support an SBP target of <120 mm Hg, based on a smaller number of trials.
REGISTRATION
URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD42023490693.
期刊介绍:
Hypertension presents top-tier articles on high blood pressure in each monthly release. These articles delve into basic science, clinical treatment, and prevention of hypertension and associated cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal conditions. Renowned for their lasting significance, these papers contribute to advancing our understanding and management of hypertension-related issues.