18F-氟咪唑缺氧 PET/CT 诊断解释标准的制定以及读片机间可靠性、再现性和性能的验证

Rick Wray, Audrey Mauguen, Laure Michaud, Doris Leithner, Randy Yeh, Nadeem Riaz, Rosna Mirtcheva, Eric Sherman, Richard Wong, John Humm, Nancy Lee, Heiko Schöder
{"title":"18F-氟咪唑缺氧 PET/CT 诊断解释标准的制定以及读片机间可靠性、再现性和性能的验证","authors":"Rick Wray, Audrey Mauguen, Laure Michaud, Doris Leithner, Randy Yeh, Nadeem Riaz, Rosna Mirtcheva, Eric Sherman, Richard Wong, John Humm, Nancy Lee, Heiko Schöder","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.267775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tumor hypoxia, an integral biomarker to guide radiotherapy, can be imaged with <sup>18</sup>F-fluoromisonidazole (<sup>18</sup>F-FMISO) hypoxia PET. One major obstacle to its broader application is the lack of standardized interpretation criteria. We sought to develop and validate practical interpretation criteria and a dedicated training protocol for nuclear medicine physicians to interpret <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO hypoxia PET. <strong>Methods:</strong> We randomly selected 123 patients with human papillomavirus–positive oropharyngeal cancer enrolled in a phase II trial who underwent 123 <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and 134 <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO PET/CT scans. Four independent nuclear medicine physicians with no <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO experience read the scans. Interpretation by a fifth nuclear medicine physician with over 2 decades of <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO experience was the reference standard. Performance was evaluated after initial instruction and subsequent dedicated training. Scans were considered positive for hypoxia by visual assessment if <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO uptake was greater than floor-of-mouth uptake. Additionally, SUV<sub>max</sub> was determined to evaluate whether quantitative assessment using tumor-to-background ratios could be helpful to define hypoxia positivity. <strong>Results:</strong> Visual assessment produced a mean sensitivity and specificity of 77.3% and 80.9%, with fair interreader agreement (κ = 0.34), after initial instruction. After dedicated training, mean sensitivity and specificity improved to 97.6% and 86.9%, with almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.86). Quantitative assessment with an estimated best SUV<sub>max</sub> ratio threshold of more than 1.2 to define hypoxia positivity produced a mean sensitivity and specificity of 56.8% and 95.9%, respectively, with substantial interreader agreement (κ = 0.66), after initial instruction. After dedicated training, mean sensitivity improved to 89.6% whereas mean specificity remained high at 95.3%, with near-perfect interreader agreement (κ = 0.86). <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Nuclear medicine physicians without <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO hypoxia PET reading experience demonstrate much improved interreader agreement with dedicated training using specific interpretation criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of 18F-Fluoromisonidazole Hypoxia PET/CT Diagnostic Interpretation Criteria and Validation of Interreader Reliability, Reproducibility, and Performance\",\"authors\":\"Rick Wray, Audrey Mauguen, Laure Michaud, Doris Leithner, Randy Yeh, Nadeem Riaz, Rosna Mirtcheva, Eric Sherman, Richard Wong, John Humm, Nancy Lee, Heiko Schöder\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnumed.124.267775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Tumor hypoxia, an integral biomarker to guide radiotherapy, can be imaged with <sup>18</sup>F-fluoromisonidazole (<sup>18</sup>F-FMISO) hypoxia PET. One major obstacle to its broader application is the lack of standardized interpretation criteria. We sought to develop and validate practical interpretation criteria and a dedicated training protocol for nuclear medicine physicians to interpret <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO hypoxia PET. <strong>Methods:</strong> We randomly selected 123 patients with human papillomavirus–positive oropharyngeal cancer enrolled in a phase II trial who underwent 123 <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and 134 <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO PET/CT scans. Four independent nuclear medicine physicians with no <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO experience read the scans. Interpretation by a fifth nuclear medicine physician with over 2 decades of <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO experience was the reference standard. Performance was evaluated after initial instruction and subsequent dedicated training. Scans were considered positive for hypoxia by visual assessment if <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO uptake was greater than floor-of-mouth uptake. Additionally, SUV<sub>max</sub> was determined to evaluate whether quantitative assessment using tumor-to-background ratios could be helpful to define hypoxia positivity. <strong>Results:</strong> Visual assessment produced a mean sensitivity and specificity of 77.3% and 80.9%, with fair interreader agreement (κ = 0.34), after initial instruction. After dedicated training, mean sensitivity and specificity improved to 97.6% and 86.9%, with almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.86). Quantitative assessment with an estimated best SUV<sub>max</sub> ratio threshold of more than 1.2 to define hypoxia positivity produced a mean sensitivity and specificity of 56.8% and 95.9%, respectively, with substantial interreader agreement (κ = 0.66), after initial instruction. After dedicated training, mean sensitivity improved to 89.6% whereas mean specificity remained high at 95.3%, with near-perfect interreader agreement (κ = 0.86). <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Nuclear medicine physicians without <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO hypoxia PET reading experience demonstrate much improved interreader agreement with dedicated training using specific interpretation criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肿瘤缺氧是指导放疗不可或缺的生物标志物,可通过18F-氟咪唑(18F-FMISO)缺氧PET成像。其广泛应用的一个主要障碍是缺乏标准化的解释标准。我们试图为核医学医生制定和验证实用的解读标准和专门的培训方案,以解读 18F-FMISO 缺氧 PET。方法:我们随机选取了 123 例人乳头状瘤病毒阳性口咽癌患者,对他们进行了 123 次 18F-FDG PET/CT 扫描和 134 次 18F-FMISO PET/CT 扫描。四名没有 18F-FMISO 经验的独立核医学医生负责读取扫描结果。第五位具有 20 多年 18F-FMISO 经验的核医学医生的判读是参考标准。在经过初步指导和后续专门培训后,对其表现进行了评估。如果 18F-FMISO 摄取大于口底摄取,则通过肉眼评估将扫描视为缺氧阳性。此外,还确定了 SUVmax,以评估使用肿瘤与背景比率进行定量评估是否有助于确定缺氧阳性。结果:经过初步指导后,视觉评估的平均灵敏度和特异性分别为 77.3% 和 80.9%,读片者之间的一致性尚可(κ = 0.34)。经过专门培训后,平均灵敏度和特异性分别提高到 97.6% 和 86.9%,几乎完全一致(κ = 0.86)。用估计的最佳 SUVmax 比值阈值大于 1.2 来定义缺氧阳性的定量评估,在经过初步指导后,平均灵敏度和特异性分别为 56.8% 和 95.9%,读片者之间的一致性很高(κ = 0.66)。经过专门培训后,平均灵敏度提高到 89.6%,而平均特异性仍高达 95.3%,读数者之间的一致性接近完美(κ = 0.86)。结论没有 18F-FMISO 缺氧 PET 阅读经验的核医学医生在接受专门培训后,使用特定的解释标准,可大大提高阅读者之间的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of 18F-Fluoromisonidazole Hypoxia PET/CT Diagnostic Interpretation Criteria and Validation of Interreader Reliability, Reproducibility, and Performance

Tumor hypoxia, an integral biomarker to guide radiotherapy, can be imaged with 18F-fluoromisonidazole (18F-FMISO) hypoxia PET. One major obstacle to its broader application is the lack of standardized interpretation criteria. We sought to develop and validate practical interpretation criteria and a dedicated training protocol for nuclear medicine physicians to interpret 18F-FMISO hypoxia PET. Methods: We randomly selected 123 patients with human papillomavirus–positive oropharyngeal cancer enrolled in a phase II trial who underwent 123 18F-FDG PET/CT and 134 18F-FMISO PET/CT scans. Four independent nuclear medicine physicians with no 18F-FMISO experience read the scans. Interpretation by a fifth nuclear medicine physician with over 2 decades of 18F-FMISO experience was the reference standard. Performance was evaluated after initial instruction and subsequent dedicated training. Scans were considered positive for hypoxia by visual assessment if 18F-FMISO uptake was greater than floor-of-mouth uptake. Additionally, SUVmax was determined to evaluate whether quantitative assessment using tumor-to-background ratios could be helpful to define hypoxia positivity. Results: Visual assessment produced a mean sensitivity and specificity of 77.3% and 80.9%, with fair interreader agreement (κ = 0.34), after initial instruction. After dedicated training, mean sensitivity and specificity improved to 97.6% and 86.9%, with almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.86). Quantitative assessment with an estimated best SUVmax ratio threshold of more than 1.2 to define hypoxia positivity produced a mean sensitivity and specificity of 56.8% and 95.9%, respectively, with substantial interreader agreement (κ = 0.66), after initial instruction. After dedicated training, mean sensitivity improved to 89.6% whereas mean specificity remained high at 95.3%, with near-perfect interreader agreement (κ = 0.86). Conclusion: Nuclear medicine physicians without 18F-FMISO hypoxia PET reading experience demonstrate much improved interreader agreement with dedicated training using specific interpretation criteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信