超越确定性:探索波斯语互动中电子标记表述的认识论和关系论述

IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
{"title":"超越确定性:探索波斯语互动中电子标记表述的认识论和关系论述","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In spoken colloquial Persian, there exists the particle ‘<em>e</em>’, which can be suffixed to the bare nominals (as in <em>pesar-e</em>: boy-<em>e</em>), nominals with some definite markers like demonstratives (as in <em>in pesar-e</em>: this boy-<em>e</em>) and some nominals with indefinite markers (as in <em>ye pesar-e</em>: a boy-<em>e</em>) (Nikravan, 2014; Heusinger and Sadeghpoor, 2020). This particle, termed as ‘enclitic -<em>e</em>’, has been insufficiently described in the literature and even this insufficient description predominantly draws on constructed sentences. The empirical investigation that underlies the present study revisits the ‘<em>e</em>’-marked nominal formulations in the context of making references to nouns in naturally occurring conversations to identify its multifaceted functions. It is demonstrated throughout the paper that the enclitic <em>e</em> marks a noun or a nominal group to denote both the speaker and recipient's (assumed) equal epistemic access to the referent, although the speaker may need some interactional work with the recipient to share his epistemic access with them. Furthermore, through this marked way of reference formulations, the speakers do more than simply referring by orienting to some measure of relational separation with the referent. Overall, the analyses reveal delicate moments of interactional work in terms of epistemic and relational functions of the <em>e</em>-marked formulations of the referents, and as such contribute to the research on the pragmatic and interactional view of definiteness in light of epistemics and relating theories.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000124000640/pdfft?md5=5e6979c4a1bb688f7c07585b58dc228f&pid=1-s2.0-S0388000124000640-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond definiteness: exploring epistemic and relational accounts of e-marked formulations in Persian interactions\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In spoken colloquial Persian, there exists the particle ‘<em>e</em>’, which can be suffixed to the bare nominals (as in <em>pesar-e</em>: boy-<em>e</em>), nominals with some definite markers like demonstratives (as in <em>in pesar-e</em>: this boy-<em>e</em>) and some nominals with indefinite markers (as in <em>ye pesar-e</em>: a boy-<em>e</em>) (Nikravan, 2014; Heusinger and Sadeghpoor, 2020). This particle, termed as ‘enclitic -<em>e</em>’, has been insufficiently described in the literature and even this insufficient description predominantly draws on constructed sentences. The empirical investigation that underlies the present study revisits the ‘<em>e</em>’-marked nominal formulations in the context of making references to nouns in naturally occurring conversations to identify its multifaceted functions. It is demonstrated throughout the paper that the enclitic <em>e</em> marks a noun or a nominal group to denote both the speaker and recipient's (assumed) equal epistemic access to the referent, although the speaker may need some interactional work with the recipient to share his epistemic access with them. Furthermore, through this marked way of reference formulations, the speakers do more than simply referring by orienting to some measure of relational separation with the referent. Overall, the analyses reveal delicate moments of interactional work in terms of epistemic and relational functions of the <em>e</em>-marked formulations of the referents, and as such contribute to the research on the pragmatic and interactional view of definiteness in light of epistemics and relating theories.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000124000640/pdfft?md5=5e6979c4a1bb688f7c07585b58dc228f&pid=1-s2.0-S0388000124000640-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000124000640\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000124000640","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在波斯语口语中,存在着 "e "这个语素,它可以后缀于空名词(如 pesar-e:boy-e)、带有一些定语标记(如在 pesar-e:this boy-e)的名词和一些带有不定语标记(如 ye pesar-e:a boy-e)的名词(Nikravan,2014;Heusinger 和 Sadeghpoor,2020)。这种被称为 "附带 -e "的微粒在文献中的描述并不充分,即使是这种不充分的描述也主要是以结构句为基础的。本研究的实证调查是在自然会话中提及名词的语境中重新审视 "e "标记的名词性表述,以确定其多方面的功能。研究结果表明,"e "标记名词或名词组,表示说话人和受话人(假定)对指称物有平等的认识能力,尽管说话人可能需要与受话人进行一些互动,才能与他们分享自己的认识能力。此外,通过这种明显的指代表述方式,说话者所做的不仅仅是简单的指代,而是导向与所指之间某种程度的关系分离。总之,分析揭示了电子标记的指代表述在认识论和关系论功能方面微妙的互动工作时刻,因此有助于根据认识论和关系论对确定性的语用和互动观点进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond definiteness: exploring epistemic and relational accounts of e-marked formulations in Persian interactions

In spoken colloquial Persian, there exists the particle ‘e’, which can be suffixed to the bare nominals (as in pesar-e: boy-e), nominals with some definite markers like demonstratives (as in in pesar-e: this boy-e) and some nominals with indefinite markers (as in ye pesar-e: a boy-e) (Nikravan, 2014; Heusinger and Sadeghpoor, 2020). This particle, termed as ‘enclitic -e’, has been insufficiently described in the literature and even this insufficient description predominantly draws on constructed sentences. The empirical investigation that underlies the present study revisits the ‘e’-marked nominal formulations in the context of making references to nouns in naturally occurring conversations to identify its multifaceted functions. It is demonstrated throughout the paper that the enclitic e marks a noun or a nominal group to denote both the speaker and recipient's (assumed) equal epistemic access to the referent, although the speaker may need some interactional work with the recipient to share his epistemic access with them. Furthermore, through this marked way of reference formulations, the speakers do more than simply referring by orienting to some measure of relational separation with the referent. Overall, the analyses reveal delicate moments of interactional work in terms of epistemic and relational functions of the e-marked formulations of the referents, and as such contribute to the research on the pragmatic and interactional view of definiteness in light of epistemics and relating theories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language Sciences
Language Sciences Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Language Sciences is a forum for debate, conducted so as to be of interest to the widest possible audience, on conceptual and theoretical issues in the various branches of general linguistics. The journal is also concerned with bringing to linguists attention current thinking about language within disciplines other than linguistics itself; relevant contributions from anthropologists, philosophers, psychologists and sociologists, among others, will be warmly received. In addition, the Editor is particularly keen to encourage the submission of essays on topics in the history and philosophy of language studies, and review articles discussing the import of significant recent works on language and linguistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信