故宫灰浆中有机添加剂使用规则探讨

IF 3.5 2区 综合性期刊 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Kuanrong Zhai , Hui Zhu , Li Luo , Bingjian Zhang , Longguan Zhu , Qiong Zhang , Peng Zhao
{"title":"故宫灰浆中有机添加剂使用规则探讨","authors":"Kuanrong Zhai ,&nbsp;Hui Zhu ,&nbsp;Li Luo ,&nbsp;Bingjian Zhang ,&nbsp;Longguan Zhu ,&nbsp;Qiong Zhang ,&nbsp;Peng Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.culher.2024.08.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Forbidden City exemplifies the official architecture of the Ming (C.E. 1368–1644) and Qing (C.E. 1644–1911) dynasties in China. The buildings within the Forbidden City adhere to a specific construction system and hierarchy. This study examined the organic additives in eighty-three lime mortar samples collected from the Forbidden City. These mortar samples were categorised into two main groups: garden mortar and construction mortar. The construction mortar was further subdivided into masonry, rendering, tile roof, and pointing mortars. Classical chemical analysis was performed to identify organic residues in the samples, including glutinous rice, sugar, oil, blood, and protein. Additionally, ovalbumin, casein, collagen, and peach gum were detected using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The results confirmed historical records regarding to the use of organic additives in ancient mortars. Statistical analysis revealed that the organic additives added to different types of mortars were selected according to the location and function of the mortar. This evidence supports the validity of traditional Chinese composite mortar scientifically. Ancient Chinese artisans adhered to rules aimed at practicality and functional realisation when selecting organic additives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15480,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Heritage","volume":"70 ","pages":"Pages 71-79"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of the rules for the use of organic additives in the mortar of the Forbidden city\",\"authors\":\"Kuanrong Zhai ,&nbsp;Hui Zhu ,&nbsp;Li Luo ,&nbsp;Bingjian Zhang ,&nbsp;Longguan Zhu ,&nbsp;Qiong Zhang ,&nbsp;Peng Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.culher.2024.08.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Forbidden City exemplifies the official architecture of the Ming (C.E. 1368–1644) and Qing (C.E. 1644–1911) dynasties in China. The buildings within the Forbidden City adhere to a specific construction system and hierarchy. This study examined the organic additives in eighty-three lime mortar samples collected from the Forbidden City. These mortar samples were categorised into two main groups: garden mortar and construction mortar. The construction mortar was further subdivided into masonry, rendering, tile roof, and pointing mortars. Classical chemical analysis was performed to identify organic residues in the samples, including glutinous rice, sugar, oil, blood, and protein. Additionally, ovalbumin, casein, collagen, and peach gum were detected using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The results confirmed historical records regarding to the use of organic additives in ancient mortars. Statistical analysis revealed that the organic additives added to different types of mortars were selected according to the location and function of the mortar. This evidence supports the validity of traditional Chinese composite mortar scientifically. Ancient Chinese artisans adhered to rules aimed at practicality and functional realisation when selecting organic additives.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cultural Heritage\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 71-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cultural Heritage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1296207424001821\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1296207424001821","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

紫禁城是中国明朝(公元 1368-1644 年)和清朝(公元 1644-1911 年)官方建筑的典范。故宫内的建筑遵循特定的建筑体系和等级制度。本研究检测了从故宫采集的 83 份石灰砂浆样本中的有机添加剂。这些砂浆样本被分为两大类:园林砂浆和建筑砂浆。建筑砂浆又细分为砌筑砂浆、渲染砂浆、瓦顶砂浆和尖顶砂浆。对样本进行了经典化学分析,以确定样本中的有机残留物,包括糯米、糖、油、血液和蛋白质。此外,还使用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)检测了卵清蛋白、酪蛋白、胶原蛋白和桃胶。结果证实了有关古代灰泥中使用有机添加剂的历史记录。统计分析显示,不同类型灰泥中添加的有机添加剂是根据灰泥的位置和功能选择的。这些证据从科学上支持了中国传统复合砂浆的有效性。中国古代工匠在选择有机添加剂时坚持以实用性和功能实现为目标的规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploration of the rules for the use of organic additives in the mortar of the Forbidden city

Exploration of the rules for the use of organic additives in the mortar of the Forbidden city

The Forbidden City exemplifies the official architecture of the Ming (C.E. 1368–1644) and Qing (C.E. 1644–1911) dynasties in China. The buildings within the Forbidden City adhere to a specific construction system and hierarchy. This study examined the organic additives in eighty-three lime mortar samples collected from the Forbidden City. These mortar samples were categorised into two main groups: garden mortar and construction mortar. The construction mortar was further subdivided into masonry, rendering, tile roof, and pointing mortars. Classical chemical analysis was performed to identify organic residues in the samples, including glutinous rice, sugar, oil, blood, and protein. Additionally, ovalbumin, casein, collagen, and peach gum were detected using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The results confirmed historical records regarding to the use of organic additives in ancient mortars. Statistical analysis revealed that the organic additives added to different types of mortars were selected according to the location and function of the mortar. This evidence supports the validity of traditional Chinese composite mortar scientifically. Ancient Chinese artisans adhered to rules aimed at practicality and functional realisation when selecting organic additives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cultural Heritage
Journal of Cultural Heritage 综合性期刊-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
166
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cultural Heritage publishes original papers which comprise previously unpublished data and present innovative methods concerning all aspects of science and technology of cultural heritage as well as interpretation and theoretical issues related to preservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信