J. González-Bao , A. Mosquera-Miguel , L. Casanova-Adán , A. Ambroa-Conde , J. Ruiz-Ramírez , A. Cabrejas-Olalla , M. Boullón-Cassau , A. Freire-Aradas , A. Rodríguez-López , C. Roth , R. Lagacé , C. Phillips , M.V. Lareu , M. de la Puente
{"title":"用于 DNA 混合物分析的先前验证的微单体型面板和法医 STR 面板的性能比较","authors":"J. González-Bao , A. Mosquera-Miguel , L. Casanova-Adán , A. Ambroa-Conde , J. Ruiz-Ramírez , A. Cabrejas-Olalla , M. Boullón-Cassau , A. Freire-Aradas , A. Rodríguez-López , C. Roth , R. Lagacé , C. Phillips , M.V. Lareu , M. de la Puente","doi":"10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Short Tandem Repeats (STRs) are the most widespread markers in forensic genetics. However, STR stutter peaks can mask alleles from a minor contributor when analysing mixtures, hindering the interpretation of complex profiles. In this study we compared the performance of a previously described panel of microhaplotypes (MHs), an alternative type of forensic marker, against a standard STR kit. The parameters evaluated included: capability of determining the minimum number of contributors in the mixture; percentages of allele drop-outs and drop-ins; retrieval of alleles belonging to the minor contributor, and estimation of likelihood ratio (LR) values. In addition, the capacity of EuroForMix software to estimate each donor’s percentage of contribution was tested, as well as the impact on results when using manually, or automatically prepared libraries. The MH panel showed better performance than STRs for the detection of 2-contributor mixtures, but the lower degree of polymorphism per MH marker hindered the task of deconvolution with multiple contributors. MHs presented higher drop-in rates and lower drop-out rates, a higher capability to recover the minor contributor’s alleles and provided higher LR values than STRs, likely due to the much higher number of loci combined in the panel. Estimations of contributor ratios using EuroForMix showed promising results and marginal differences were found in these values between manually and automatically prepared libraries. Overall, results showed that the mixture detection performance of the MH panel was better or equal to the standard forensic autosomal STR panel, indicating microhaplotypes are informative markers for this purpose.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50435,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 103144"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497324001406/pdfft?md5=091e33948eaa97d39c1fbf587274acaf&pid=1-s2.0-S1872497324001406-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison of a previously validated microhaplotype panel and a forensic STR panel for DNA mixture analysis\",\"authors\":\"J. González-Bao , A. Mosquera-Miguel , L. Casanova-Adán , A. Ambroa-Conde , J. Ruiz-Ramírez , A. Cabrejas-Olalla , M. Boullón-Cassau , A. Freire-Aradas , A. Rodríguez-López , C. Roth , R. Lagacé , C. Phillips , M.V. Lareu , M. de la Puente\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Short Tandem Repeats (STRs) are the most widespread markers in forensic genetics. However, STR stutter peaks can mask alleles from a minor contributor when analysing mixtures, hindering the interpretation of complex profiles. In this study we compared the performance of a previously described panel of microhaplotypes (MHs), an alternative type of forensic marker, against a standard STR kit. The parameters evaluated included: capability of determining the minimum number of contributors in the mixture; percentages of allele drop-outs and drop-ins; retrieval of alleles belonging to the minor contributor, and estimation of likelihood ratio (LR) values. In addition, the capacity of EuroForMix software to estimate each donor’s percentage of contribution was tested, as well as the impact on results when using manually, or automatically prepared libraries. The MH panel showed better performance than STRs for the detection of 2-contributor mixtures, but the lower degree of polymorphism per MH marker hindered the task of deconvolution with multiple contributors. MHs presented higher drop-in rates and lower drop-out rates, a higher capability to recover the minor contributor’s alleles and provided higher LR values than STRs, likely due to the much higher number of loci combined in the panel. Estimations of contributor ratios using EuroForMix showed promising results and marginal differences were found in these values between manually and automatically prepared libraries. Overall, results showed that the mixture detection performance of the MH panel was better or equal to the standard forensic autosomal STR panel, indicating microhaplotypes are informative markers for this purpose.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Science International-Genetics\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497324001406/pdfft?md5=091e33948eaa97d39c1fbf587274acaf&pid=1-s2.0-S1872497324001406-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Science International-Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497324001406\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497324001406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance comparison of a previously validated microhaplotype panel and a forensic STR panel for DNA mixture analysis
Short Tandem Repeats (STRs) are the most widespread markers in forensic genetics. However, STR stutter peaks can mask alleles from a minor contributor when analysing mixtures, hindering the interpretation of complex profiles. In this study we compared the performance of a previously described panel of microhaplotypes (MHs), an alternative type of forensic marker, against a standard STR kit. The parameters evaluated included: capability of determining the minimum number of contributors in the mixture; percentages of allele drop-outs and drop-ins; retrieval of alleles belonging to the minor contributor, and estimation of likelihood ratio (LR) values. In addition, the capacity of EuroForMix software to estimate each donor’s percentage of contribution was tested, as well as the impact on results when using manually, or automatically prepared libraries. The MH panel showed better performance than STRs for the detection of 2-contributor mixtures, but the lower degree of polymorphism per MH marker hindered the task of deconvolution with multiple contributors. MHs presented higher drop-in rates and lower drop-out rates, a higher capability to recover the minor contributor’s alleles and provided higher LR values than STRs, likely due to the much higher number of loci combined in the panel. Estimations of contributor ratios using EuroForMix showed promising results and marginal differences were found in these values between manually and automatically prepared libraries. Overall, results showed that the mixture detection performance of the MH panel was better or equal to the standard forensic autosomal STR panel, indicating microhaplotypes are informative markers for this purpose.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Science International: Genetics is the premier journal in the field of Forensic Genetics. This branch of Forensic Science can be defined as the application of genetics to human and non-human material (in the sense of a science with the purpose of studying inherited characteristics for the analysis of inter- and intra-specific variations in populations) for the resolution of legal conflicts.
The scope of the journal includes:
Forensic applications of human polymorphism.
Testing of paternity and other family relationships, immigration cases, typing of biological stains and tissues from criminal casework, identification of human remains by DNA testing methodologies.
Description of human polymorphisms of forensic interest, with special interest in DNA polymorphisms.
Autosomal DNA polymorphisms, mini- and microsatellites (or short tandem repeats, STRs), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), X and Y chromosome polymorphisms, mtDNA polymorphisms, and any other type of DNA variation with potential forensic applications.
Non-human DNA polymorphisms for crime scene investigation.
Population genetics of human polymorphisms of forensic interest.
Population data, especially from DNA polymorphisms of interest for the solution of forensic problems.
DNA typing methodologies and strategies.
Biostatistical methods in forensic genetics.
Evaluation of DNA evidence in forensic problems (such as paternity or immigration cases, criminal casework, identification), classical and new statistical approaches.
Standards in forensic genetics.
Recommendations of regulatory bodies concerning methods, markers, interpretation or strategies or proposals for procedural or technical standards.
Quality control.
Quality control and quality assurance strategies, proficiency testing for DNA typing methodologies.
Criminal DNA databases.
Technical, legal and statistical issues.
General ethical and legal issues related to forensic genetics.