鸽子对刺激后延迟的选择:刺激连续性和反应要求的影响

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL
Daisuke Saeki , Tetsuo Yamaguchi
{"title":"鸽子对刺激后延迟的选择:刺激连续性和反应要求的影响","authors":"Daisuke Saeki ,&nbsp;Tetsuo Yamaguchi","doi":"10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examined the effects of stimulus continuity and response requirements on pigeon choices between post-reinforcer delays (from 2 s to 8 s) using concurrent-chains schedules with FR 1 schedules arranged for the choice phase. In Experiment 1, using seven pigeons, the effect of stimulus continuity, the presentation of the same stimulus (background color of the computer screen) during the post-reinforcer delay period as in the pre-reinforcer delay period, was examined. In Experiment 2, the effect of stimulus continuity was examined under the conditions where a response was required (FR 1) to initiate the post-reinforcer delay using eight pigeons. The experimental results indicated that when the same stimulus as in the pre-reinforcer delay was presented continuously during the post-reinforcer delay and a response was required to start the post-reinforcer delay, the subjects showed relatively high sensitivity to differences between post-reinforcer delays. The implications of the results are discussed from a new perspective for the analysis of self-control choices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47305,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Motivation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choice between post-reinforcer delays in pigeons: Effects of stimulus continuity and response requirement\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Saeki ,&nbsp;Tetsuo Yamaguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examined the effects of stimulus continuity and response requirements on pigeon choices between post-reinforcer delays (from 2 s to 8 s) using concurrent-chains schedules with FR 1 schedules arranged for the choice phase. In Experiment 1, using seven pigeons, the effect of stimulus continuity, the presentation of the same stimulus (background color of the computer screen) during the post-reinforcer delay period as in the pre-reinforcer delay period, was examined. In Experiment 2, the effect of stimulus continuity was examined under the conditions where a response was required (FR 1) to initiate the post-reinforcer delay using eight pigeons. The experimental results indicated that when the same stimulus as in the pre-reinforcer delay was presented continuously during the post-reinforcer delay and a response was required to start the post-reinforcer delay, the subjects showed relatively high sensitivity to differences between post-reinforcer delays. The implications of the results are discussed from a new perspective for the analysis of self-control choices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Motivation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Motivation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969024000912\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969024000912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究使用并发链式刺激表,在选择阶段安排了FR 1刺激表,考察了刺激连续性和反应要求对鸽子在后刺激物延迟(2秒至8秒)之间选择的影响。在实验 1 中,使用 7 只鸽子研究了刺激连续性的影响,即在刺激物后延迟阶段呈现与刺激物前延迟阶段相同的刺激(计算机屏幕的背景颜色)。在实验 2 中,实验人员使用 8 只鸽子,在需要做出反应(FR 1)才能启动后刺激物延迟的条件下,考察了刺激连续性的影响。实验结果表明,当在后施动剂延迟期间连续出现与前施动剂延迟相同的刺激,并且要求鸽子做出反应以启动后施动剂延迟时,被试对后施动剂延迟之间的差异表现出相对较高的敏感性。本文从分析自我控制选择的新角度讨论了这一结果的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Choice between post-reinforcer delays in pigeons: Effects of stimulus continuity and response requirement

This study examined the effects of stimulus continuity and response requirements on pigeon choices between post-reinforcer delays (from 2 s to 8 s) using concurrent-chains schedules with FR 1 schedules arranged for the choice phase. In Experiment 1, using seven pigeons, the effect of stimulus continuity, the presentation of the same stimulus (background color of the computer screen) during the post-reinforcer delay period as in the pre-reinforcer delay period, was examined. In Experiment 2, the effect of stimulus continuity was examined under the conditions where a response was required (FR 1) to initiate the post-reinforcer delay using eight pigeons. The experimental results indicated that when the same stimulus as in the pre-reinforcer delay was presented continuously during the post-reinforcer delay and a response was required to start the post-reinforcer delay, the subjects showed relatively high sensitivity to differences between post-reinforcer delays. The implications of the results are discussed from a new perspective for the analysis of self-control choices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Learning and Motivation features original experimental research devoted to the analysis of basic phenomena and mechanisms of learning, memory, and motivation. These studies, involving either animal or human subjects, examine behavioral, biological, and evolutionary influences on the learning and motivation processes, and often report on an integrated series of experiments that advance knowledge in this field. Theoretical papers and shorter reports are also considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信