针对东非病毒株的商用四价口蹄疫疫苗评估显示,其免疫原性和保护期有限

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
{"title":"针对东非病毒株的商用四价口蹄疫疫苗评估显示,其免疫原性和保护期有限","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) causes a contagious disease (FMD) in cloven-hoofed animals. For FMD-endemic countries, vaccination is critical for controlling disease but is rarely monitored, despite substantial funds spent on vaccine purchases. We evaluated antibody responses in cattle to two commercial vaccines each containing antigens of four FMDV serotypes. Sampling was done over 360 days, with serology for each serotype performed using commercially available solid phase competition ELISAs (SPCE) and with virus neutralization tests (VNT) employing regionally relevant test viruses. A primary course of each vaccine was administered to 37 calves, some of which received a second dose after 28 days. Using new production batches of vaccines, all calves received a booster vaccination 180 days post vaccination, while 10 additional naïve calves were also vaccinated using the new batches and followed up for ∼180 days. Simple and general linear models were used to compare antibody responses which varied substantially according to vaccine, dose regime, serotype, and test, but were mostly insufficient to ensure a high likelihood of adequate or sustained probable protection. One of the vaccines administered as a two-dose primary course of vaccination was superior to other options, but even then, data trajectories from VNT responses suggested probable protection of 75 % of calves for 6 months for only one virus serotype. Calves administered with the other vaccine and those given a single primary dose developed low levels of antibodies, offering predicted likely protection lasting less than two months. Individual SPCE results were weakly correlated (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.48) to neutralization and associated likelihoods of protection but SPCE and VNT agreed on which vaccine and dose regime performed best. Our findings highlight gaps in immunogenicity of FMD vaccines used in East Africa and reinforce the importance of independent quality control studies to evaluate and improve commercial FMD vaccines and vaccination regimes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24010077/pdfft?md5=99e42016e19bbba139c5ac8ef55d450d&pid=1-s2.0-S0264410X24010077-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of commercial quadrivalent foot-and-mouth disease vaccines against east African virus strains reveals limited immunogenicity and duration of protection\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) causes a contagious disease (FMD) in cloven-hoofed animals. For FMD-endemic countries, vaccination is critical for controlling disease but is rarely monitored, despite substantial funds spent on vaccine purchases. We evaluated antibody responses in cattle to two commercial vaccines each containing antigens of four FMDV serotypes. Sampling was done over 360 days, with serology for each serotype performed using commercially available solid phase competition ELISAs (SPCE) and with virus neutralization tests (VNT) employing regionally relevant test viruses. A primary course of each vaccine was administered to 37 calves, some of which received a second dose after 28 days. Using new production batches of vaccines, all calves received a booster vaccination 180 days post vaccination, while 10 additional naïve calves were also vaccinated using the new batches and followed up for ∼180 days. Simple and general linear models were used to compare antibody responses which varied substantially according to vaccine, dose regime, serotype, and test, but were mostly insufficient to ensure a high likelihood of adequate or sustained probable protection. One of the vaccines administered as a two-dose primary course of vaccination was superior to other options, but even then, data trajectories from VNT responses suggested probable protection of 75 % of calves for 6 months for only one virus serotype. Calves administered with the other vaccine and those given a single primary dose developed low levels of antibodies, offering predicted likely protection lasting less than two months. Individual SPCE results were weakly correlated (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.48) to neutralization and associated likelihoods of protection but SPCE and VNT agreed on which vaccine and dose regime performed best. Our findings highlight gaps in immunogenicity of FMD vaccines used in East Africa and reinforce the importance of independent quality control studies to evaluate and improve commercial FMD vaccines and vaccination regimes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24010077/pdfft?md5=99e42016e19bbba139c5ac8ef55d450d&pid=1-s2.0-S0264410X24010077-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24010077\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24010077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

口蹄疫病毒(FMDV)会导致蹄类动物感染口蹄疫(FMD)。对于口蹄疫流行的国家来说,疫苗接种对于控制疾病至关重要,但尽管在疫苗采购上花费了大量资金,却很少对疫苗接种情况进行监测。我们评估了牛对两种商用疫苗的抗体反应,每种疫苗都含有四种口蹄疫病毒血清型的抗原。采样时间为 360 天,使用市售固相竞争酶联免疫吸附试验 (SPCE) 对每种血清型进行血清学检测,并使用地区相关试验病毒进行病毒中和试验 (VNT)。37 头小牛接种了每种疫苗的第一个疗程,其中一些小牛在 28 天后接种了第二剂疫苗。使用新生产的疫苗批次,所有犊牛在接种后 180 天接受了加强免疫,另外 10 头天真的犊牛也使用新批次疫苗接种,并随访了 180 天。抗体反应因疫苗、剂量制度、血清型和试验的不同而有很大差异,但大多不足以确保充分或持续的可能保护。其中一种疫苗的主要接种程序为两剂,优于其他选择,但即便如此,VNT 反应的数据轨迹也表明,只有一种病毒血清型可在 6 个月内为 75% 的犊牛提供可能的保护。接种其他疫苗的犊牛和接种单剂疫苗的犊牛产生的抗体水平较低,预计保护期可能不足两个月。单个 SPCE 结果与中和及相关的保护可能性呈弱相关性 (r2 = 0.48),但 SPCE 和 VNT 就哪种疫苗和剂量制度表现最佳达成了一致。我们的研究结果突显了东非使用的口蹄疫疫苗在免疫原性方面的差距,并强化了独立质量控制研究对评估和改进商用口蹄疫疫苗和疫苗接种方案的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of commercial quadrivalent foot-and-mouth disease vaccines against east African virus strains reveals limited immunogenicity and duration of protection

Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) causes a contagious disease (FMD) in cloven-hoofed animals. For FMD-endemic countries, vaccination is critical for controlling disease but is rarely monitored, despite substantial funds spent on vaccine purchases. We evaluated antibody responses in cattle to two commercial vaccines each containing antigens of four FMDV serotypes. Sampling was done over 360 days, with serology for each serotype performed using commercially available solid phase competition ELISAs (SPCE) and with virus neutralization tests (VNT) employing regionally relevant test viruses. A primary course of each vaccine was administered to 37 calves, some of which received a second dose after 28 days. Using new production batches of vaccines, all calves received a booster vaccination 180 days post vaccination, while 10 additional naïve calves were also vaccinated using the new batches and followed up for ∼180 days. Simple and general linear models were used to compare antibody responses which varied substantially according to vaccine, dose regime, serotype, and test, but were mostly insufficient to ensure a high likelihood of adequate or sustained probable protection. One of the vaccines administered as a two-dose primary course of vaccination was superior to other options, but even then, data trajectories from VNT responses suggested probable protection of 75 % of calves for 6 months for only one virus serotype. Calves administered with the other vaccine and those given a single primary dose developed low levels of antibodies, offering predicted likely protection lasting less than two months. Individual SPCE results were weakly correlated (r2 = 0.48) to neutralization and associated likelihoods of protection but SPCE and VNT agreed on which vaccine and dose regime performed best. Our findings highlight gaps in immunogenicity of FMD vaccines used in East Africa and reinforce the importance of independent quality control studies to evaluate and improve commercial FMD vaccines and vaccination regimes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信