利用本地化有机质-有机碳方程改进菲律宾红树林土壤碳估算

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Severino G. Salmo III, Sean Paul B. Manalo, Precious B. Jacob, Maria Elisa B. Gerona-Daga, Camila Frances P. Naputo, Mareah Wayne A. Maramag, Mohammad Basyuni, Frida Sidik, Richard MacKenzie
{"title":"利用本地化有机质-有机碳方程改进菲律宾红树林土壤碳估算","authors":"Severino G. Salmo III,&nbsp;Sean Paul B. Manalo,&nbsp;Precious B. Jacob,&nbsp;Maria Elisa B. Gerona-Daga,&nbsp;Camila Frances P. Naputo,&nbsp;Mareah Wayne A. Maramag,&nbsp;Mohammad Basyuni,&nbsp;Frida Sidik,&nbsp;Richard MacKenzie","doi":"10.1186/s13021-024-00276-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Southeast Asian (SEA) mangroves are globally recognized as blue carbon hotspots. Methodologies that measure mangrove soil carbon stock (SCS) are either accurate but costly (i.e., elemental analyzers), or economical but less accurate (i.e., loss-on-ignition [LOI]). Most SEA countries estimate SCS by measuring soil organic matter (OM) through the LOI method then converting it into organic carbon (OC) using a conventional conversion equation (%C<sub>org</sub> = 0.415 * % LOI + 2.89, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.59, n = 78) developed from Palau mangroves. The local site conditions in Palau does not reflect the wide range of environmental settings and disturbances in the Philippines. Consequently, the conventional conversion equation possibly compounds the inaccuracies of converting OM to OC causing over- or under-estimated SCS. Here, we generated a localized OM-OC conversion equation and tested its accuracy in computing SCS against the conventional equation. The localized equation was generated by plotting % OC (from elemental analyzer) against the % OM (from LOI). The study was conducted in different mangrove stands (natural, restored, and mangrove-recolonized fishponds) in Oriental Mindoro and Sorsogon, Philippines from the West and North Philippine Sea biogeographic regions, respectively. The OM:OC ratios were also statistically tested based on (a) stand types, (b) among natural stands, and (c) across different ages of the restored and recolonized stands. Increasing the accuracy of OM-OC conversion equations will improve SCS estimates that will yield reasonable C emission reduction targets for the country’s commitments on Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) under the Paris Agreement.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The localized conversion equation is %OC = 0.36 * % LOI + 2.40 (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.67; n = 458). The SOM:OC ratios showed significant differences based on stand types (<i>x</i><sup>2</sup> = 19.24; P = 6.63 × 10<sup>–05</sup>), among natural stands (F = 23.22; p = 1.17 × 10<sup>–08</sup>), and among ages of restored (F = 5.14; P = 0.03) and recolonized stands (F = 3.4; P = 0.02). SCS estimates using the localized (5%) and stand-specific equations (7%) were similar with the values derived from an elemental analyzer. In contrast, the conventional equation overestimates SCS by 20%.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The calculated SCS improves as the conversion equation becomes more reflective of localized site conditions. Both localized and stand-specific conversion equations yielded more accurate SCS compared to the conventional equation. While our study explored only two out of the six marine biogeographic regions in the Philippines, we proved that having a localized conversion equation leads to improved SCS measurements. Using our proposed equations will make more realistic SCS targets (and therefore GHG reductions) in designing mangrove restoration programs to achieve the country’s NDC commitments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":505,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Balance and Management","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13021-024-00276-y","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving soil carbon estimates of Philippine mangroves using localized organic matter to organic carbon equations\",\"authors\":\"Severino G. Salmo III,&nbsp;Sean Paul B. Manalo,&nbsp;Precious B. Jacob,&nbsp;Maria Elisa B. Gerona-Daga,&nbsp;Camila Frances P. Naputo,&nbsp;Mareah Wayne A. Maramag,&nbsp;Mohammad Basyuni,&nbsp;Frida Sidik,&nbsp;Richard MacKenzie\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13021-024-00276-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Southeast Asian (SEA) mangroves are globally recognized as blue carbon hotspots. Methodologies that measure mangrove soil carbon stock (SCS) are either accurate but costly (i.e., elemental analyzers), or economical but less accurate (i.e., loss-on-ignition [LOI]). Most SEA countries estimate SCS by measuring soil organic matter (OM) through the LOI method then converting it into organic carbon (OC) using a conventional conversion equation (%C<sub>org</sub> = 0.415 * % LOI + 2.89, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.59, n = 78) developed from Palau mangroves. The local site conditions in Palau does not reflect the wide range of environmental settings and disturbances in the Philippines. Consequently, the conventional conversion equation possibly compounds the inaccuracies of converting OM to OC causing over- or under-estimated SCS. Here, we generated a localized OM-OC conversion equation and tested its accuracy in computing SCS against the conventional equation. The localized equation was generated by plotting % OC (from elemental analyzer) against the % OM (from LOI). The study was conducted in different mangrove stands (natural, restored, and mangrove-recolonized fishponds) in Oriental Mindoro and Sorsogon, Philippines from the West and North Philippine Sea biogeographic regions, respectively. The OM:OC ratios were also statistically tested based on (a) stand types, (b) among natural stands, and (c) across different ages of the restored and recolonized stands. Increasing the accuracy of OM-OC conversion equations will improve SCS estimates that will yield reasonable C emission reduction targets for the country’s commitments on Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) under the Paris Agreement.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The localized conversion equation is %OC = 0.36 * % LOI + 2.40 (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.67; n = 458). The SOM:OC ratios showed significant differences based on stand types (<i>x</i><sup>2</sup> = 19.24; P = 6.63 × 10<sup>–05</sup>), among natural stands (F = 23.22; p = 1.17 × 10<sup>–08</sup>), and among ages of restored (F = 5.14; P = 0.03) and recolonized stands (F = 3.4; P = 0.02). SCS estimates using the localized (5%) and stand-specific equations (7%) were similar with the values derived from an elemental analyzer. In contrast, the conventional equation overestimates SCS by 20%.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The calculated SCS improves as the conversion equation becomes more reflective of localized site conditions. Both localized and stand-specific conversion equations yielded more accurate SCS compared to the conventional equation. While our study explored only two out of the six marine biogeographic regions in the Philippines, we proved that having a localized conversion equation leads to improved SCS measurements. Using our proposed equations will make more realistic SCS targets (and therefore GHG reductions) in designing mangrove restoration programs to achieve the country’s NDC commitments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Carbon Balance and Management\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13021-024-00276-y\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Carbon Balance and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13021-024-00276-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Balance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13021-024-00276-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景东南亚(SEA)红树林是全球公认的蓝碳热点。测量红树林土壤碳储量(SCS)的方法要么精确但昂贵(如元素分析仪),要么经济但不太精确(如点火损失法[LOI])。大多数东南亚国家通过 LOI 法测量土壤有机质 (OM),然后使用帕劳红树林开发的传统转换方程 (%Corg = 0.415 * % LOI + 2.89, R2 = 0.59, n = 78) 将其转换为有机碳 (OC),从而估算 SCS。帕劳当地的现场条件并不能反映菲律宾广泛的环境背景和干扰。因此,传统的转换方程可能会加剧将 OM 转换为 OC 的不准确性,导致 SCS 估值过高或过低。在此,我们生成了一个本地化的 OM-OC 转换方程,并对照传统方程测试了其计算 SCS 的准确性。通过绘制 OC%(来自元素分析仪)与 OM%(来自 LOI)的对比图,生成了本地化方程。该研究分别在菲律宾西菲律宾海和北菲律宾海生物地理区域的东民都洛岛和朔尔索贡岛的不同红树林(自然红树林、恢复红树林和红树林复育鱼塘)中进行。OM:OC 比率还根据(a)林分类型、(b)自然林分之间以及(c)恢复和重新定居林分的不同年龄进行了统计测试。提高 OM-OC 转换方程的准确性将改善 SCS 估算值,从而为该国在《巴黎协定》下所做的国家确定贡献(NDC)承诺提供合理的碳减排目标。SOM:OC 比值在不同林分类型(x2 = 19.24;P = 6.63 × 10-05)、不同自然林分(F = 23.22;P = 1.17 × 10-08)、不同树龄的恢复林分(F = 5.14;P = 0.03)和再植林分(F = 3.4;P = 0.02)之间存在显著差异。使用局部方程(5%)和特定林分方程(7%)得出的 SCS 估计值与元素分析仪得出的值相似。相比之下,传统方程高估了 20% 的 SCS。与传统方程相比,本地化和针对具体地点的转换方程都能产生更准确的 SCS。虽然我们的研究只探索了菲律宾六个海洋生物地理区域中的两个,但我们证明,采用本地化转换方程可以改进 SCS 测量结果。在设计红树林恢复计划以实现国家的 NDC 承诺时,使用我们提出的等式将使 SCS 目标(以及温室气体减排量)更切合实际。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving soil carbon estimates of Philippine mangroves using localized organic matter to organic carbon equations

Background

Southeast Asian (SEA) mangroves are globally recognized as blue carbon hotspots. Methodologies that measure mangrove soil carbon stock (SCS) are either accurate but costly (i.e., elemental analyzers), or economical but less accurate (i.e., loss-on-ignition [LOI]). Most SEA countries estimate SCS by measuring soil organic matter (OM) through the LOI method then converting it into organic carbon (OC) using a conventional conversion equation (%Corg = 0.415 * % LOI + 2.89, R2 = 0.59, n = 78) developed from Palau mangroves. The local site conditions in Palau does not reflect the wide range of environmental settings and disturbances in the Philippines. Consequently, the conventional conversion equation possibly compounds the inaccuracies of converting OM to OC causing over- or under-estimated SCS. Here, we generated a localized OM-OC conversion equation and tested its accuracy in computing SCS against the conventional equation. The localized equation was generated by plotting % OC (from elemental analyzer) against the % OM (from LOI). The study was conducted in different mangrove stands (natural, restored, and mangrove-recolonized fishponds) in Oriental Mindoro and Sorsogon, Philippines from the West and North Philippine Sea biogeographic regions, respectively. The OM:OC ratios were also statistically tested based on (a) stand types, (b) among natural stands, and (c) across different ages of the restored and recolonized stands. Increasing the accuracy of OM-OC conversion equations will improve SCS estimates that will yield reasonable C emission reduction targets for the country’s commitments on Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) under the Paris Agreement.

Results

The localized conversion equation is %OC = 0.36 * % LOI + 2.40 (R2 = 0.67; n = 458). The SOM:OC ratios showed significant differences based on stand types (x2 = 19.24; P = 6.63 × 10–05), among natural stands (F = 23.22; p = 1.17 × 10–08), and among ages of restored (F = 5.14; P = 0.03) and recolonized stands (F = 3.4; P = 0.02). SCS estimates using the localized (5%) and stand-specific equations (7%) were similar with the values derived from an elemental analyzer. In contrast, the conventional equation overestimates SCS by 20%.

Conclusions

The calculated SCS improves as the conversion equation becomes more reflective of localized site conditions. Both localized and stand-specific conversion equations yielded more accurate SCS compared to the conventional equation. While our study explored only two out of the six marine biogeographic regions in the Philippines, we proved that having a localized conversion equation leads to improved SCS measurements. Using our proposed equations will make more realistic SCS targets (and therefore GHG reductions) in designing mangrove restoration programs to achieve the country’s NDC commitments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Carbon Balance and Management
Carbon Balance and Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Carbon Balance and Management is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of research aimed at developing a comprehensive policy relevant to the understanding of the global carbon cycle. The global carbon cycle involves important couplings between climate, atmospheric CO2 and the terrestrial and oceanic biospheres. The current transformation of the carbon cycle due to changes in climate and atmospheric composition is widely recognized as potentially dangerous for the biosphere and for the well-being of humankind, and therefore monitoring, understanding and predicting the evolution of the carbon cycle in the context of the whole biosphere (both terrestrial and marine) is a challenge to the scientific community. This demands interdisciplinary research and new approaches for studying geographical and temporal distributions of carbon pools and fluxes, control and feedback mechanisms of the carbon-climate system, points of intervention and windows of opportunity for managing the carbon-climate-human system. Carbon Balance and Management is a medium for researchers in the field to convey the results of their research across disciplinary boundaries. Through this dissemination of research, the journal aims to support the work of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and to provide governmental and non-governmental organizations with instantaneous access to continually emerging knowledge, including paradigm shifts and consensual views.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信